Cargando…

The efficacy of Raman spectroscopy in the diagnosis of esophageal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Esophageal cancer is characterized by its high occurrence rate and difficulty to treat successfully, therefore early diagnosis is extremely important. Our article is aimed to comprehensively analyze the relative effectiveness of Raman spectroscopy (RS) in the diagnosis of suspected esoph...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hao, Jianqi, Chen, Cong, Jin, Hongyu, Chen, Nan, Zhou, Jian, Zhu, Yuzhou, Chung, Kayi, Pu, Qiang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AME Publishing Company 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8797439/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35117838
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tcr-20-854
_version_ 1784641553214472192
author Hao, Jianqi
Chen, Cong
Jin, Hongyu
Chen, Nan
Zhou, Jian
Zhu, Yuzhou
Chung, Kayi
Pu, Qiang
author_facet Hao, Jianqi
Chen, Cong
Jin, Hongyu
Chen, Nan
Zhou, Jian
Zhu, Yuzhou
Chung, Kayi
Pu, Qiang
author_sort Hao, Jianqi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Esophageal cancer is characterized by its high occurrence rate and difficulty to treat successfully, therefore early diagnosis is extremely important. Our article is aimed to comprehensively analyze the relative effectiveness of Raman spectroscopy (RS) in the diagnosis of suspected esophageal cancer. METHODS: We performed a systemic search in PubMed, EMBASE, CNKI and Web of science from 2007 to 2020. We used the diagnostic data of true positive (TP), false positive (FP), true negative (TN) and false negative (FN) to estimate the pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratios (LR), and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), with 95% confidence intervals (CI), based on random effects models. The SROC curve analysis and AUC were performed to estimate the overall performance of Raman spectroscopy. QUADAS-2 guidelines were used to evaluate the quality of each study. RESULTS: Nine articles were included according to our inclusion and exclusion criteria. General pooled diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of RS to esophageal cancer were 0.91 (95% CI, 0.89–0.93) and 0.92 (95% CI, 0.91–0.94). The pooled PLR and NLR were 18.98 (95% CI, 6.61–54.49) and 0.09 (95% CI, 0.05–0.16), respectively. The DOR was 217.21 (95% CI, 68.32–690.53) indicating high accuracy. And the AUC of SROC curve was 0.9779. CONCLUSIONS: We found a promisingly high sensitivity and specificity of RS in the diagnosis of suspected esophageal mass.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8797439
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher AME Publishing Company
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87974392022-02-02 The efficacy of Raman spectroscopy in the diagnosis of esophageal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis Hao, Jianqi Chen, Cong Jin, Hongyu Chen, Nan Zhou, Jian Zhu, Yuzhou Chung, Kayi Pu, Qiang Transl Cancer Res Original Article BACKGROUND: Esophageal cancer is characterized by its high occurrence rate and difficulty to treat successfully, therefore early diagnosis is extremely important. Our article is aimed to comprehensively analyze the relative effectiveness of Raman spectroscopy (RS) in the diagnosis of suspected esophageal cancer. METHODS: We performed a systemic search in PubMed, EMBASE, CNKI and Web of science from 2007 to 2020. We used the diagnostic data of true positive (TP), false positive (FP), true negative (TN) and false negative (FN) to estimate the pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratios (LR), and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), with 95% confidence intervals (CI), based on random effects models. The SROC curve analysis and AUC were performed to estimate the overall performance of Raman spectroscopy. QUADAS-2 guidelines were used to evaluate the quality of each study. RESULTS: Nine articles were included according to our inclusion and exclusion criteria. General pooled diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of RS to esophageal cancer were 0.91 (95% CI, 0.89–0.93) and 0.92 (95% CI, 0.91–0.94). The pooled PLR and NLR were 18.98 (95% CI, 6.61–54.49) and 0.09 (95% CI, 0.05–0.16), respectively. The DOR was 217.21 (95% CI, 68.32–690.53) indicating high accuracy. And the AUC of SROC curve was 0.9779. CONCLUSIONS: We found a promisingly high sensitivity and specificity of RS in the diagnosis of suspected esophageal mass. AME Publishing Company 2020-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8797439/ /pubmed/35117838 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tcr-20-854 Text en 2020 Translational Cancer Research. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Article
Hao, Jianqi
Chen, Cong
Jin, Hongyu
Chen, Nan
Zhou, Jian
Zhu, Yuzhou
Chung, Kayi
Pu, Qiang
The efficacy of Raman spectroscopy in the diagnosis of esophageal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title The efficacy of Raman spectroscopy in the diagnosis of esophageal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full The efficacy of Raman spectroscopy in the diagnosis of esophageal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr The efficacy of Raman spectroscopy in the diagnosis of esophageal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed The efficacy of Raman spectroscopy in the diagnosis of esophageal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short The efficacy of Raman spectroscopy in the diagnosis of esophageal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort efficacy of raman spectroscopy in the diagnosis of esophageal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8797439/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35117838
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tcr-20-854
work_keys_str_mv AT haojianqi theefficacyoframanspectroscopyinthediagnosisofesophagealcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT chencong theefficacyoframanspectroscopyinthediagnosisofesophagealcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT jinhongyu theefficacyoframanspectroscopyinthediagnosisofesophagealcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT chennan theefficacyoframanspectroscopyinthediagnosisofesophagealcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zhoujian theefficacyoframanspectroscopyinthediagnosisofesophagealcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zhuyuzhou theefficacyoframanspectroscopyinthediagnosisofesophagealcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT chungkayi theefficacyoframanspectroscopyinthediagnosisofesophagealcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT puqiang theefficacyoframanspectroscopyinthediagnosisofesophagealcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT haojianqi efficacyoframanspectroscopyinthediagnosisofesophagealcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT chencong efficacyoframanspectroscopyinthediagnosisofesophagealcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT jinhongyu efficacyoframanspectroscopyinthediagnosisofesophagealcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT chennan efficacyoframanspectroscopyinthediagnosisofesophagealcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zhoujian efficacyoframanspectroscopyinthediagnosisofesophagealcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zhuyuzhou efficacyoframanspectroscopyinthediagnosisofesophagealcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT chungkayi efficacyoframanspectroscopyinthediagnosisofesophagealcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT puqiang efficacyoframanspectroscopyinthediagnosisofesophagealcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis