Cargando…
The efficacy of Raman spectroscopy in the diagnosis of esophageal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
BACKGROUND: Esophageal cancer is characterized by its high occurrence rate and difficulty to treat successfully, therefore early diagnosis is extremely important. Our article is aimed to comprehensively analyze the relative effectiveness of Raman spectroscopy (RS) in the diagnosis of suspected esoph...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
AME Publishing Company
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8797439/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35117838 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tcr-20-854 |
_version_ | 1784641553214472192 |
---|---|
author | Hao, Jianqi Chen, Cong Jin, Hongyu Chen, Nan Zhou, Jian Zhu, Yuzhou Chung, Kayi Pu, Qiang |
author_facet | Hao, Jianqi Chen, Cong Jin, Hongyu Chen, Nan Zhou, Jian Zhu, Yuzhou Chung, Kayi Pu, Qiang |
author_sort | Hao, Jianqi |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Esophageal cancer is characterized by its high occurrence rate and difficulty to treat successfully, therefore early diagnosis is extremely important. Our article is aimed to comprehensively analyze the relative effectiveness of Raman spectroscopy (RS) in the diagnosis of suspected esophageal cancer. METHODS: We performed a systemic search in PubMed, EMBASE, CNKI and Web of science from 2007 to 2020. We used the diagnostic data of true positive (TP), false positive (FP), true negative (TN) and false negative (FN) to estimate the pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratios (LR), and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), with 95% confidence intervals (CI), based on random effects models. The SROC curve analysis and AUC were performed to estimate the overall performance of Raman spectroscopy. QUADAS-2 guidelines were used to evaluate the quality of each study. RESULTS: Nine articles were included according to our inclusion and exclusion criteria. General pooled diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of RS to esophageal cancer were 0.91 (95% CI, 0.89–0.93) and 0.92 (95% CI, 0.91–0.94). The pooled PLR and NLR were 18.98 (95% CI, 6.61–54.49) and 0.09 (95% CI, 0.05–0.16), respectively. The DOR was 217.21 (95% CI, 68.32–690.53) indicating high accuracy. And the AUC of SROC curve was 0.9779. CONCLUSIONS: We found a promisingly high sensitivity and specificity of RS in the diagnosis of suspected esophageal mass. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8797439 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | AME Publishing Company |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87974392022-02-02 The efficacy of Raman spectroscopy in the diagnosis of esophageal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis Hao, Jianqi Chen, Cong Jin, Hongyu Chen, Nan Zhou, Jian Zhu, Yuzhou Chung, Kayi Pu, Qiang Transl Cancer Res Original Article BACKGROUND: Esophageal cancer is characterized by its high occurrence rate and difficulty to treat successfully, therefore early diagnosis is extremely important. Our article is aimed to comprehensively analyze the relative effectiveness of Raman spectroscopy (RS) in the diagnosis of suspected esophageal cancer. METHODS: We performed a systemic search in PubMed, EMBASE, CNKI and Web of science from 2007 to 2020. We used the diagnostic data of true positive (TP), false positive (FP), true negative (TN) and false negative (FN) to estimate the pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratios (LR), and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), with 95% confidence intervals (CI), based on random effects models. The SROC curve analysis and AUC were performed to estimate the overall performance of Raman spectroscopy. QUADAS-2 guidelines were used to evaluate the quality of each study. RESULTS: Nine articles were included according to our inclusion and exclusion criteria. General pooled diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of RS to esophageal cancer were 0.91 (95% CI, 0.89–0.93) and 0.92 (95% CI, 0.91–0.94). The pooled PLR and NLR were 18.98 (95% CI, 6.61–54.49) and 0.09 (95% CI, 0.05–0.16), respectively. The DOR was 217.21 (95% CI, 68.32–690.53) indicating high accuracy. And the AUC of SROC curve was 0.9779. CONCLUSIONS: We found a promisingly high sensitivity and specificity of RS in the diagnosis of suspected esophageal mass. AME Publishing Company 2020-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8797439/ /pubmed/35117838 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tcr-20-854 Text en 2020 Translational Cancer Research. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Hao, Jianqi Chen, Cong Jin, Hongyu Chen, Nan Zhou, Jian Zhu, Yuzhou Chung, Kayi Pu, Qiang The efficacy of Raman spectroscopy in the diagnosis of esophageal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title | The efficacy of Raman spectroscopy in the diagnosis of esophageal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full | The efficacy of Raman spectroscopy in the diagnosis of esophageal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | The efficacy of Raman spectroscopy in the diagnosis of esophageal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | The efficacy of Raman spectroscopy in the diagnosis of esophageal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short | The efficacy of Raman spectroscopy in the diagnosis of esophageal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | efficacy of raman spectroscopy in the diagnosis of esophageal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8797439/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35117838 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tcr-20-854 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT haojianqi theefficacyoframanspectroscopyinthediagnosisofesophagealcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT chencong theefficacyoframanspectroscopyinthediagnosisofesophagealcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT jinhongyu theefficacyoframanspectroscopyinthediagnosisofesophagealcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT chennan theefficacyoframanspectroscopyinthediagnosisofesophagealcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT zhoujian theefficacyoframanspectroscopyinthediagnosisofesophagealcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT zhuyuzhou theefficacyoframanspectroscopyinthediagnosisofesophagealcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT chungkayi theefficacyoframanspectroscopyinthediagnosisofesophagealcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT puqiang theefficacyoframanspectroscopyinthediagnosisofesophagealcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT haojianqi efficacyoframanspectroscopyinthediagnosisofesophagealcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT chencong efficacyoframanspectroscopyinthediagnosisofesophagealcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT jinhongyu efficacyoframanspectroscopyinthediagnosisofesophagealcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT chennan efficacyoframanspectroscopyinthediagnosisofesophagealcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT zhoujian efficacyoframanspectroscopyinthediagnosisofesophagealcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT zhuyuzhou efficacyoframanspectroscopyinthediagnosisofesophagealcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT chungkayi efficacyoframanspectroscopyinthediagnosisofesophagealcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT puqiang efficacyoframanspectroscopyinthediagnosisofesophagealcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |