Cargando…
Modified procedure of anterior orbital exenteration enables eye socket reconstruction: A retrospective cohort study
The conventional procedure of anterior orbital exenteration is unfavorable for eye socket reconstruction, whereas a modified procedure enables socket reconstruction and prosthesis fitting. Our study aims to compare the cosmetic outcomes between these 2 surgical techniques. We retrospectively recruit...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8797479/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35089227 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000028698 |
_version_ | 1784641563226275840 |
---|---|
author | Ma, Ruiqi Li, Xiaofeng Gan, Lu Guo, Jie Qian, Jiang |
author_facet | Ma, Ruiqi Li, Xiaofeng Gan, Lu Guo, Jie Qian, Jiang |
author_sort | Ma, Ruiqi |
collection | PubMed |
description | The conventional procedure of anterior orbital exenteration is unfavorable for eye socket reconstruction, whereas a modified procedure enables socket reconstruction and prosthesis fitting. Our study aims to compare the cosmetic outcomes between these 2 surgical techniques. We retrospectively recruited patients treated with modified or conventional exenteration during January 2015 to May 2021 in our hospital. The conventional approach was performed along with dermis-fat graft transplantation. The modified approach was conducted followed by eye socket reconstruction and eyelid blepharoplasty. The clinical data were collected and analyzed, including demographics, tumor characteristics, postoperative complications, tumor-related events, and cosmetic outcomes. Forty-nine patients were consecutively recruited in this study, including 22 cases of modified exenteration and 27 cases of conventional exenteration. Forty-four subjects (89.8%) were diagnosed with ocular surface malignancies (conjunctival melanoma and squamous cell carcinoma) and 5 subjects (10.2%) were diagnosed with extraocular stage of uveal melanoma. After follow-up for 31.8 ± 17.1 months, the 1-, 2-, 5-year overall survival rate was calculated as 100%, 79.2%, and 59.2% in the Modified group, and 94.2%, 73.8%, and 51.5% in the Conventional group. Comparison of the survival curves showed no significant differences. In the Modified group, all patients received orbital implant placement and eye socket reconstruction. The implant motility was satisfactory in 12 cases (54.5%) with movements in 3 to 4 directions. The eyelid function was acceptable in 17 cases (77.3%) with no entropion, ectropion or lower lid laxity. Ocular prosthesis was delivered in 17 cases (77.3%) with successful fitting in 11 cases (64.7%). The self-rated cosmetic score was statistically (t test, P < .0001) higher in the Modified group (6.7 ± 0.9) than the Conventional group (2.2 ± 0.4). The modified approach to anterior orbital exenteration enables eye socket reconstruction and cosmetic rehabilitation while still preserves the curable chance for the treatment of advanced periocular/intraocular malignancies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8797479 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87974792022-01-31 Modified procedure of anterior orbital exenteration enables eye socket reconstruction: A retrospective cohort study Ma, Ruiqi Li, Xiaofeng Gan, Lu Guo, Jie Qian, Jiang Medicine (Baltimore) 7100 The conventional procedure of anterior orbital exenteration is unfavorable for eye socket reconstruction, whereas a modified procedure enables socket reconstruction and prosthesis fitting. Our study aims to compare the cosmetic outcomes between these 2 surgical techniques. We retrospectively recruited patients treated with modified or conventional exenteration during January 2015 to May 2021 in our hospital. The conventional approach was performed along with dermis-fat graft transplantation. The modified approach was conducted followed by eye socket reconstruction and eyelid blepharoplasty. The clinical data were collected and analyzed, including demographics, tumor characteristics, postoperative complications, tumor-related events, and cosmetic outcomes. Forty-nine patients were consecutively recruited in this study, including 22 cases of modified exenteration and 27 cases of conventional exenteration. Forty-four subjects (89.8%) were diagnosed with ocular surface malignancies (conjunctival melanoma and squamous cell carcinoma) and 5 subjects (10.2%) were diagnosed with extraocular stage of uveal melanoma. After follow-up for 31.8 ± 17.1 months, the 1-, 2-, 5-year overall survival rate was calculated as 100%, 79.2%, and 59.2% in the Modified group, and 94.2%, 73.8%, and 51.5% in the Conventional group. Comparison of the survival curves showed no significant differences. In the Modified group, all patients received orbital implant placement and eye socket reconstruction. The implant motility was satisfactory in 12 cases (54.5%) with movements in 3 to 4 directions. The eyelid function was acceptable in 17 cases (77.3%) with no entropion, ectropion or lower lid laxity. Ocular prosthesis was delivered in 17 cases (77.3%) with successful fitting in 11 cases (64.7%). The self-rated cosmetic score was statistically (t test, P < .0001) higher in the Modified group (6.7 ± 0.9) than the Conventional group (2.2 ± 0.4). The modified approach to anterior orbital exenteration enables eye socket reconstruction and cosmetic rehabilitation while still preserves the curable chance for the treatment of advanced periocular/intraocular malignancies. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022-01-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8797479/ /pubmed/35089227 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000028698 Text en Copyright © 2022 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) |
spellingShingle | 7100 Ma, Ruiqi Li, Xiaofeng Gan, Lu Guo, Jie Qian, Jiang Modified procedure of anterior orbital exenteration enables eye socket reconstruction: A retrospective cohort study |
title | Modified procedure of anterior orbital exenteration enables eye socket reconstruction: A retrospective cohort study |
title_full | Modified procedure of anterior orbital exenteration enables eye socket reconstruction: A retrospective cohort study |
title_fullStr | Modified procedure of anterior orbital exenteration enables eye socket reconstruction: A retrospective cohort study |
title_full_unstemmed | Modified procedure of anterior orbital exenteration enables eye socket reconstruction: A retrospective cohort study |
title_short | Modified procedure of anterior orbital exenteration enables eye socket reconstruction: A retrospective cohort study |
title_sort | modified procedure of anterior orbital exenteration enables eye socket reconstruction: a retrospective cohort study |
topic | 7100 |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8797479/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35089227 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000028698 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT maruiqi modifiedprocedureofanteriororbitalexenterationenableseyesocketreconstructionaretrospectivecohortstudy AT lixiaofeng modifiedprocedureofanteriororbitalexenterationenableseyesocketreconstructionaretrospectivecohortstudy AT ganlu modifiedprocedureofanteriororbitalexenterationenableseyesocketreconstructionaretrospectivecohortstudy AT guojie modifiedprocedureofanteriororbitalexenterationenableseyesocketreconstructionaretrospectivecohortstudy AT qianjiang modifiedprocedureofanteriororbitalexenterationenableseyesocketreconstructionaretrospectivecohortstudy |