Cargando…

Modified procedure of anterior orbital exenteration enables eye socket reconstruction: A retrospective cohort study

The conventional procedure of anterior orbital exenteration is unfavorable for eye socket reconstruction, whereas a modified procedure enables socket reconstruction and prosthesis fitting. Our study aims to compare the cosmetic outcomes between these 2 surgical techniques. We retrospectively recruit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ma, Ruiqi, Li, Xiaofeng, Gan, Lu, Guo, Jie, Qian, Jiang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8797479/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35089227
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000028698
_version_ 1784641563226275840
author Ma, Ruiqi
Li, Xiaofeng
Gan, Lu
Guo, Jie
Qian, Jiang
author_facet Ma, Ruiqi
Li, Xiaofeng
Gan, Lu
Guo, Jie
Qian, Jiang
author_sort Ma, Ruiqi
collection PubMed
description The conventional procedure of anterior orbital exenteration is unfavorable for eye socket reconstruction, whereas a modified procedure enables socket reconstruction and prosthesis fitting. Our study aims to compare the cosmetic outcomes between these 2 surgical techniques. We retrospectively recruited patients treated with modified or conventional exenteration during January 2015 to May 2021 in our hospital. The conventional approach was performed along with dermis-fat graft transplantation. The modified approach was conducted followed by eye socket reconstruction and eyelid blepharoplasty. The clinical data were collected and analyzed, including demographics, tumor characteristics, postoperative complications, tumor-related events, and cosmetic outcomes. Forty-nine patients were consecutively recruited in this study, including 22 cases of modified exenteration and 27 cases of conventional exenteration. Forty-four subjects (89.8%) were diagnosed with ocular surface malignancies (conjunctival melanoma and squamous cell carcinoma) and 5 subjects (10.2%) were diagnosed with extraocular stage of uveal melanoma. After follow-up for 31.8 ± 17.1 months, the 1-, 2-, 5-year overall survival rate was calculated as 100%, 79.2%, and 59.2% in the Modified group, and 94.2%, 73.8%, and 51.5% in the Conventional group. Comparison of the survival curves showed no significant differences. In the Modified group, all patients received orbital implant placement and eye socket reconstruction. The implant motility was satisfactory in 12 cases (54.5%) with movements in 3 to 4 directions. The eyelid function was acceptable in 17 cases (77.3%) with no entropion, ectropion or lower lid laxity. Ocular prosthesis was delivered in 17 cases (77.3%) with successful fitting in 11 cases (64.7%). The self-rated cosmetic score was statistically (t test, P < .0001) higher in the Modified group (6.7 ± 0.9) than the Conventional group (2.2 ± 0.4). The modified approach to anterior orbital exenteration enables eye socket reconstruction and cosmetic rehabilitation while still preserves the curable chance for the treatment of advanced periocular/intraocular malignancies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8797479
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87974792022-01-31 Modified procedure of anterior orbital exenteration enables eye socket reconstruction: A retrospective cohort study Ma, Ruiqi Li, Xiaofeng Gan, Lu Guo, Jie Qian, Jiang Medicine (Baltimore) 7100 The conventional procedure of anterior orbital exenteration is unfavorable for eye socket reconstruction, whereas a modified procedure enables socket reconstruction and prosthesis fitting. Our study aims to compare the cosmetic outcomes between these 2 surgical techniques. We retrospectively recruited patients treated with modified or conventional exenteration during January 2015 to May 2021 in our hospital. The conventional approach was performed along with dermis-fat graft transplantation. The modified approach was conducted followed by eye socket reconstruction and eyelid blepharoplasty. The clinical data were collected and analyzed, including demographics, tumor characteristics, postoperative complications, tumor-related events, and cosmetic outcomes. Forty-nine patients were consecutively recruited in this study, including 22 cases of modified exenteration and 27 cases of conventional exenteration. Forty-four subjects (89.8%) were diagnosed with ocular surface malignancies (conjunctival melanoma and squamous cell carcinoma) and 5 subjects (10.2%) were diagnosed with extraocular stage of uveal melanoma. After follow-up for 31.8 ± 17.1 months, the 1-, 2-, 5-year overall survival rate was calculated as 100%, 79.2%, and 59.2% in the Modified group, and 94.2%, 73.8%, and 51.5% in the Conventional group. Comparison of the survival curves showed no significant differences. In the Modified group, all patients received orbital implant placement and eye socket reconstruction. The implant motility was satisfactory in 12 cases (54.5%) with movements in 3 to 4 directions. The eyelid function was acceptable in 17 cases (77.3%) with no entropion, ectropion or lower lid laxity. Ocular prosthesis was delivered in 17 cases (77.3%) with successful fitting in 11 cases (64.7%). The self-rated cosmetic score was statistically (t test, P < .0001) higher in the Modified group (6.7 ± 0.9) than the Conventional group (2.2 ± 0.4). The modified approach to anterior orbital exenteration enables eye socket reconstruction and cosmetic rehabilitation while still preserves the curable chance for the treatment of advanced periocular/intraocular malignancies. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022-01-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8797479/ /pubmed/35089227 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000028698 Text en Copyright © 2022 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
spellingShingle 7100
Ma, Ruiqi
Li, Xiaofeng
Gan, Lu
Guo, Jie
Qian, Jiang
Modified procedure of anterior orbital exenteration enables eye socket reconstruction: A retrospective cohort study
title Modified procedure of anterior orbital exenteration enables eye socket reconstruction: A retrospective cohort study
title_full Modified procedure of anterior orbital exenteration enables eye socket reconstruction: A retrospective cohort study
title_fullStr Modified procedure of anterior orbital exenteration enables eye socket reconstruction: A retrospective cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Modified procedure of anterior orbital exenteration enables eye socket reconstruction: A retrospective cohort study
title_short Modified procedure of anterior orbital exenteration enables eye socket reconstruction: A retrospective cohort study
title_sort modified procedure of anterior orbital exenteration enables eye socket reconstruction: a retrospective cohort study
topic 7100
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8797479/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35089227
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000028698
work_keys_str_mv AT maruiqi modifiedprocedureofanteriororbitalexenterationenableseyesocketreconstructionaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT lixiaofeng modifiedprocedureofanteriororbitalexenterationenableseyesocketreconstructionaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT ganlu modifiedprocedureofanteriororbitalexenterationenableseyesocketreconstructionaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT guojie modifiedprocedureofanteriororbitalexenterationenableseyesocketreconstructionaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT qianjiang modifiedprocedureofanteriororbitalexenterationenableseyesocketreconstructionaretrospectivecohortstudy