Cargando…

Efficacy of re-resection versus radiofrequency ablation for recurrent Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage 0/A hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after resection for primary HCC

BACKGROUND: Whether repeat surgical resection (RSR) or radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is a better option for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after resection for primary HCC remains controversial. This study was to investigate the clinical efficacy of RSR versus RFA in the treatment of recurr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yin, Xieling, Hua, Tianqi, Liang, Chi, Chen, Zhong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AME Publishing Company 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8797533/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35116847
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tcr.2019.06.11
_version_ 1784641575212548096
author Yin, Xieling
Hua, Tianqi
Liang, Chi
Chen, Zhong
author_facet Yin, Xieling
Hua, Tianqi
Liang, Chi
Chen, Zhong
author_sort Yin, Xieling
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Whether repeat surgical resection (RSR) or radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is a better option for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after resection for primary HCC remains controversial. This study was to investigate the clinical efficacy of RSR versus RFA in the treatment of recurrent HCC at Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage 0/A after resection of primary HCC. METHODS: The patients treated by RSR (n=57) or RFA (n=51) for recurrent BCLC stage 0/A HCC in the Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University and Third Affiliated Hospital of Second Military Medical University from January 2008 to March 2018 were included. The general condition, clinicopathological characteristics, and survival were analyzed, and the baseline features and long-term survival were compared between two groups. RESULTS: The baseline characteristics were comparable between two groups. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates were 96.5%, 80.9%, and 60.6% in RSR group, respectively, and 96.1%, 76.8%, and 59.4% in RFA group, respectively (P=0.48). The 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival (OS) rates after treatment for recurrent HCC were 78.9%, 50.5%, and 29.7% in RSR group, respectively, and 80.3%, 50.9%, and 26.0% in RFA group, respectively (P=0.67). The 1-, 3-, and 5-year disease-free survival rates were 68.4%, 39.4%, and 26.6% in RSR group, respectively, and 62.8%, 32.8%, and 20.4% in RFA group, respectively (P=0.55). The incidence of treatment-related complications was significantly higher in the RSR than in the RFA group (42.11% vs. 11.76%, P<0.001). The median hospital stay was significantly shorter in the RFA than in the RSR group (3 vs. 9 days, P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: RSR and RFA have similar survival benefits in the treatment of recurrent BCLC stage 0/A HCC. RFA is superior to RSR in terms of hospital stay and incidence of treatment-related complications.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8797533
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher AME Publishing Company
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87975332022-02-02 Efficacy of re-resection versus radiofrequency ablation for recurrent Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage 0/A hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after resection for primary HCC Yin, Xieling Hua, Tianqi Liang, Chi Chen, Zhong Transl Cancer Res Original Article BACKGROUND: Whether repeat surgical resection (RSR) or radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is a better option for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after resection for primary HCC remains controversial. This study was to investigate the clinical efficacy of RSR versus RFA in the treatment of recurrent HCC at Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage 0/A after resection of primary HCC. METHODS: The patients treated by RSR (n=57) or RFA (n=51) for recurrent BCLC stage 0/A HCC in the Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University and Third Affiliated Hospital of Second Military Medical University from January 2008 to March 2018 were included. The general condition, clinicopathological characteristics, and survival were analyzed, and the baseline features and long-term survival were compared between two groups. RESULTS: The baseline characteristics were comparable between two groups. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates were 96.5%, 80.9%, and 60.6% in RSR group, respectively, and 96.1%, 76.8%, and 59.4% in RFA group, respectively (P=0.48). The 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival (OS) rates after treatment for recurrent HCC were 78.9%, 50.5%, and 29.7% in RSR group, respectively, and 80.3%, 50.9%, and 26.0% in RFA group, respectively (P=0.67). The 1-, 3-, and 5-year disease-free survival rates were 68.4%, 39.4%, and 26.6% in RSR group, respectively, and 62.8%, 32.8%, and 20.4% in RFA group, respectively (P=0.55). The incidence of treatment-related complications was significantly higher in the RSR than in the RFA group (42.11% vs. 11.76%, P<0.001). The median hospital stay was significantly shorter in the RFA than in the RSR group (3 vs. 9 days, P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: RSR and RFA have similar survival benefits in the treatment of recurrent BCLC stage 0/A HCC. RFA is superior to RSR in terms of hospital stay and incidence of treatment-related complications. AME Publishing Company 2019-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8797533/ /pubmed/35116847 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tcr.2019.06.11 Text en 2019 Translational Cancer Research. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Article
Yin, Xieling
Hua, Tianqi
Liang, Chi
Chen, Zhong
Efficacy of re-resection versus radiofrequency ablation for recurrent Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage 0/A hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after resection for primary HCC
title Efficacy of re-resection versus radiofrequency ablation for recurrent Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage 0/A hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after resection for primary HCC
title_full Efficacy of re-resection versus radiofrequency ablation for recurrent Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage 0/A hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after resection for primary HCC
title_fullStr Efficacy of re-resection versus radiofrequency ablation for recurrent Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage 0/A hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after resection for primary HCC
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy of re-resection versus radiofrequency ablation for recurrent Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage 0/A hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after resection for primary HCC
title_short Efficacy of re-resection versus radiofrequency ablation for recurrent Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage 0/A hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after resection for primary HCC
title_sort efficacy of re-resection versus radiofrequency ablation for recurrent barcelona clinic liver cancer stage 0/a hepatocellular carcinoma (hcc) after resection for primary hcc
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8797533/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35116847
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tcr.2019.06.11
work_keys_str_mv AT yinxieling efficacyofreresectionversusradiofrequencyablationforrecurrentbarcelonacliniclivercancerstage0ahepatocellularcarcinomahccafterresectionforprimaryhcc
AT huatianqi efficacyofreresectionversusradiofrequencyablationforrecurrentbarcelonacliniclivercancerstage0ahepatocellularcarcinomahccafterresectionforprimaryhcc
AT liangchi efficacyofreresectionversusradiofrequencyablationforrecurrentbarcelonacliniclivercancerstage0ahepatocellularcarcinomahccafterresectionforprimaryhcc
AT chenzhong efficacyofreresectionversusradiofrequencyablationforrecurrentbarcelonacliniclivercancerstage0ahepatocellularcarcinomahccafterresectionforprimaryhcc