Cargando…

Expression and prognostic value of PD-L1 and PD-L2 in ovarian cancer

BACKGROUND: In the present study, we aimed to investigate the expression and prognostic value of co-stimulatory molecules, programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) and PD-L2, in ovarian cancer (OC). METHODS: Immunohistochemical (IHC) staining was used to assess the expressions of PD-L1 and PD-L2 in 77 case...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xue, Chunyan, Zhu, Dawei, Chen, Lujun, Xu, Yun, Xu, Bin, Zhang, Dachuan, Jiang, Jingting
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AME Publishing Company 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8797717/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35116740
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tcr.2019.01.09
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: In the present study, we aimed to investigate the expression and prognostic value of co-stimulatory molecules, programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) and PD-L2, in ovarian cancer (OC). METHODS: Immunohistochemical (IHC) staining was used to assess the expressions of PD-L1 and PD-L2 in 77 cases of OC, and 10 cases of benign ovarian cyst were employed as negative controls. Moreover, χ(2) test was used to analyze the correlation between the PD-L1/PD-L2 expression and clinicopathological parameters. Kaplan-Meier method was used to compare the effects of PD-L1/PD-L2 expression level on the overall survival (OS) of OC patients. RESULTS: PD-L1 and PD-L2 were mainly expressed on membrane and in cytoplasm of OC cells. The high-expression rate of PD-L1 and PD-L2 in OC tissues was 44.16% (34/77) and 22.08% (17/77), respectively. The expression of PD-L1 in OC cells was significantly correlated with FIGO stage (P=0.026), while its expression was not significantly correlated with other clinicopathological parameters. There was no significant correlation between PD-L2 and any clinicopathological parameters. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed that the OS of high PD-L1 expression group was significantly shorter compared with the low PD-L1 expression group (HR =2.689, 95% CI: 1.400–5.163). Patients with high PD-L2 expression also exhibited significantly shorter OS (HR =2.204, 95% CI: 1.037–4.682). Multivariable analysis displayed that high expression of PD-L1 (HR =2.275, 95% CI: 1.120–4.169), high expression of PD-L2 (HR =2.314, 95% CI: 1.136–4.714) and FIGO stage (HR =11.229, 95% CI: 1.373–91.865) were independent prognostic factors of OC. When negative expressions of both PD-L1 and PD-L2 were used as a combined prognostic factor, the OS was significantly prolonged (HR =3.396, 95% CI: 1.858–6.029). According to our previous studies, patients with negative PD-L1 expression and high T-bet(+) TIL infiltration have higher OS than other patients. Patients with positive PD-L1 expression and low T-bet(+) TIL infiltration exhibit the shortest OS. Collectively, our findings provided the basis for PD-1/PD-L1 or PD-1/PD-L2 blockade therapy for OC patients. CONCLUSIONS: Co-stimulatory molecules, PD-L1 and PD-L2, were highly expressed in OC tissues, and their expression levels were correlated with FIGO stage, age and prognosis. These results suggested that PD-L1 and PD-L2 were involved in the occurrence and development of malignant OC, indicating their potential value in clinical diagnosis and prognosis of OC.