Cargando…

A model to guide the management and decision of re-planning during radiotherapy for cervical cancer

BACKGROUND: To establish a model to predict whether re-planning is needed in the process of cervical cancer radiotherapy. METHODS: We collected the clinical indexes of 132 patients diagnosed with cervical cancer receiving concurrent chemotherapy and radiotherapy, including 33 factors about tumor mar...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Wei, Li, Xiuhua, Lin, Tingting, Ma, Fang, Ma, Xiaoyu, Wu, Xiaoli, Sun, Yingming, Sun, Xiaoge
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AME Publishing Company 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8797880/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35116382
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tcr-21-2545
_version_ 1784641660297150464
author Zhang, Wei
Li, Xiuhua
Lin, Tingting
Ma, Fang
Ma, Xiaoyu
Wu, Xiaoli
Sun, Yingming
Sun, Xiaoge
author_facet Zhang, Wei
Li, Xiuhua
Lin, Tingting
Ma, Fang
Ma, Xiaoyu
Wu, Xiaoli
Sun, Yingming
Sun, Xiaoge
author_sort Zhang, Wei
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To establish a model to predict whether re-planning is needed in the process of cervical cancer radiotherapy. METHODS: We collected the clinical indexes of 132 patients diagnosed with cervical cancer receiving concurrent chemotherapy and radiotherapy, including 33 factors about tumor markers [carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), cancer antigen 125 (CA-125), squamous cell carcinoma antigen (SCC)], tumor volume, rectal volume, bladder volume, volumes receiving 30–50 Gy in organs-at-risk (OARs), and the maximum dose (Dmax) received by 1–2 cc in OARs. We established a multivariate model for re-planning evaluation via principal component analysis, and then verified the model based on the internal data. RESULTS: We identified the dose index (P1), tumor size index (P2), and volumes receiving 30–50 Gy in OARs and the tumor (P3) as the three most weighted factors of the re-planning model. We set the cut-off for the re-planning modification requirement at 1. The model was consistent with R = 0.12P1 + 0.21P2 + 0.31P3, and it performed accurately that area under the test set characteristics curve (AUC) =0.826]. CONCLUSIONS: Our proposed method can help to reduce image re-examination during treatment, decrease toxicities in OARs, shorten the radiotherapy course, lessen oncologists’ efforts, and save medical resources.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8797880
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher AME Publishing Company
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87978802022-02-02 A model to guide the management and decision of re-planning during radiotherapy for cervical cancer Zhang, Wei Li, Xiuhua Lin, Tingting Ma, Fang Ma, Xiaoyu Wu, Xiaoli Sun, Yingming Sun, Xiaoge Transl Cancer Res Original Article BACKGROUND: To establish a model to predict whether re-planning is needed in the process of cervical cancer radiotherapy. METHODS: We collected the clinical indexes of 132 patients diagnosed with cervical cancer receiving concurrent chemotherapy and radiotherapy, including 33 factors about tumor markers [carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), cancer antigen 125 (CA-125), squamous cell carcinoma antigen (SCC)], tumor volume, rectal volume, bladder volume, volumes receiving 30–50 Gy in organs-at-risk (OARs), and the maximum dose (Dmax) received by 1–2 cc in OARs. We established a multivariate model for re-planning evaluation via principal component analysis, and then verified the model based on the internal data. RESULTS: We identified the dose index (P1), tumor size index (P2), and volumes receiving 30–50 Gy in OARs and the tumor (P3) as the three most weighted factors of the re-planning model. We set the cut-off for the re-planning modification requirement at 1. The model was consistent with R = 0.12P1 + 0.21P2 + 0.31P3, and it performed accurately that area under the test set characteristics curve (AUC) =0.826]. CONCLUSIONS: Our proposed method can help to reduce image re-examination during treatment, decrease toxicities in OARs, shorten the radiotherapy course, lessen oncologists’ efforts, and save medical resources. AME Publishing Company 2021-12 /pmc/articles/PMC8797880/ /pubmed/35116382 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tcr-21-2545 Text en 2021 Translational Cancer Research. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Article
Zhang, Wei
Li, Xiuhua
Lin, Tingting
Ma, Fang
Ma, Xiaoyu
Wu, Xiaoli
Sun, Yingming
Sun, Xiaoge
A model to guide the management and decision of re-planning during radiotherapy for cervical cancer
title A model to guide the management and decision of re-planning during radiotherapy for cervical cancer
title_full A model to guide the management and decision of re-planning during radiotherapy for cervical cancer
title_fullStr A model to guide the management and decision of re-planning during radiotherapy for cervical cancer
title_full_unstemmed A model to guide the management and decision of re-planning during radiotherapy for cervical cancer
title_short A model to guide the management and decision of re-planning during radiotherapy for cervical cancer
title_sort model to guide the management and decision of re-planning during radiotherapy for cervical cancer
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8797880/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35116382
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tcr-21-2545
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangwei amodeltoguidethemanagementanddecisionofreplanningduringradiotherapyforcervicalcancer
AT lixiuhua amodeltoguidethemanagementanddecisionofreplanningduringradiotherapyforcervicalcancer
AT lintingting amodeltoguidethemanagementanddecisionofreplanningduringradiotherapyforcervicalcancer
AT mafang amodeltoguidethemanagementanddecisionofreplanningduringradiotherapyforcervicalcancer
AT maxiaoyu amodeltoguidethemanagementanddecisionofreplanningduringradiotherapyforcervicalcancer
AT wuxiaoli amodeltoguidethemanagementanddecisionofreplanningduringradiotherapyforcervicalcancer
AT sunyingming amodeltoguidethemanagementanddecisionofreplanningduringradiotherapyforcervicalcancer
AT sunxiaoge amodeltoguidethemanagementanddecisionofreplanningduringradiotherapyforcervicalcancer
AT zhangwei modeltoguidethemanagementanddecisionofreplanningduringradiotherapyforcervicalcancer
AT lixiuhua modeltoguidethemanagementanddecisionofreplanningduringradiotherapyforcervicalcancer
AT lintingting modeltoguidethemanagementanddecisionofreplanningduringradiotherapyforcervicalcancer
AT mafang modeltoguidethemanagementanddecisionofreplanningduringradiotherapyforcervicalcancer
AT maxiaoyu modeltoguidethemanagementanddecisionofreplanningduringradiotherapyforcervicalcancer
AT wuxiaoli modeltoguidethemanagementanddecisionofreplanningduringradiotherapyforcervicalcancer
AT sunyingming modeltoguidethemanagementanddecisionofreplanningduringradiotherapyforcervicalcancer
AT sunxiaoge modeltoguidethemanagementanddecisionofreplanningduringradiotherapyforcervicalcancer