Cargando…

Intraoperative radiotherapy versus whole-breast external beam radiotherapy, and other factors associated with the prognosis of early breast cancer treated with breast-conserving surgery and radiotherapy: a retrospective study from SEER database

BACKGROUND: This study was aimed to investigate the prognostic factors of early breast cancer treated with breast-conserving surgery (BCS) and radiotherapy. Besides, we focused our attention exclusively on the comparison of the impact on prognosis between intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) and whole...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sun, Ming-Shuai, Liu, Hong-Jin, Liu, Yin-Hua, Xu, Ling, Ye, Jing-Ming
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AME Publishing Company 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8798017/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35117317
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tcr-20-2441
_version_ 1784641693700587520
author Sun, Ming-Shuai
Liu, Hong-Jin
Liu, Yin-Hua
Xu, Ling
Ye, Jing-Ming
author_facet Sun, Ming-Shuai
Liu, Hong-Jin
Liu, Yin-Hua
Xu, Ling
Ye, Jing-Ming
author_sort Sun, Ming-Shuai
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: This study was aimed to investigate the prognostic factors of early breast cancer treated with breast-conserving surgery (BCS) and radiotherapy. Besides, we focused our attention exclusively on the comparison of the impact on prognosis between intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) and whole-breast external beam radiotherapy (EBRT). METHODS: An observational cohort study was performed on patients with Tis-2 N0–1 M0 breast cancer from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database who treated with BCS and radiotherapy. Cox regression analysis, Kaplan-Meier analysis, and propensity score matching (PSM) were used to estimate risk factors for overall survival (OS) and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS). RESULTS: Of the 98,614 early breast cancer patients treated with BCS and radiotherapy, 97,164 (98.5%) patients underwent EBRT and 1,450 (1.5%) underwent IORT. Multivariable Cox regression analysis showed that early breast cancer patients with age ≥65, poor marital status, lack of medical insurance, histological grade III/IV (SEER 4 grades), high T stage, high N stage, and TNBC were associated with a decreased OS/BCSS, whereas ER-positive and PR-positive were associated with an improved OS/BCSS. No significant difference was observed in survival between IORT and EBRT groups (P=0.213 for OS, P=0.180 for BCSS), or between intraoperative beam radiation and intraoperative radioactive implants groups (P=0.319 for OS, P=0.972 for BCSS). CONCLUSIONS: Our study can help clinicians identify patients with poor prognosis after breast-conserving therapy. IORT may be an alternative to EBRT for early breast cancer patients who are unable to complete the long-term postoperative radiation treatment. Beam radiation and radioactive implants are both ideal alternatives for patients who choose IORT.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8798017
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher AME Publishing Company
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87980172022-02-02 Intraoperative radiotherapy versus whole-breast external beam radiotherapy, and other factors associated with the prognosis of early breast cancer treated with breast-conserving surgery and radiotherapy: a retrospective study from SEER database Sun, Ming-Shuai Liu, Hong-Jin Liu, Yin-Hua Xu, Ling Ye, Jing-Ming Transl Cancer Res Original Article BACKGROUND: This study was aimed to investigate the prognostic factors of early breast cancer treated with breast-conserving surgery (BCS) and radiotherapy. Besides, we focused our attention exclusively on the comparison of the impact on prognosis between intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) and whole-breast external beam radiotherapy (EBRT). METHODS: An observational cohort study was performed on patients with Tis-2 N0–1 M0 breast cancer from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database who treated with BCS and radiotherapy. Cox regression analysis, Kaplan-Meier analysis, and propensity score matching (PSM) were used to estimate risk factors for overall survival (OS) and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS). RESULTS: Of the 98,614 early breast cancer patients treated with BCS and radiotherapy, 97,164 (98.5%) patients underwent EBRT and 1,450 (1.5%) underwent IORT. Multivariable Cox regression analysis showed that early breast cancer patients with age ≥65, poor marital status, lack of medical insurance, histological grade III/IV (SEER 4 grades), high T stage, high N stage, and TNBC were associated with a decreased OS/BCSS, whereas ER-positive and PR-positive were associated with an improved OS/BCSS. No significant difference was observed in survival between IORT and EBRT groups (P=0.213 for OS, P=0.180 for BCSS), or between intraoperative beam radiation and intraoperative radioactive implants groups (P=0.319 for OS, P=0.972 for BCSS). CONCLUSIONS: Our study can help clinicians identify patients with poor prognosis after breast-conserving therapy. IORT may be an alternative to EBRT for early breast cancer patients who are unable to complete the long-term postoperative radiation treatment. Beam radiation and radioactive implants are both ideal alternatives for patients who choose IORT. AME Publishing Company 2020-11 /pmc/articles/PMC8798017/ /pubmed/35117317 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tcr-20-2441 Text en 2020 Translational Cancer Research. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Article
Sun, Ming-Shuai
Liu, Hong-Jin
Liu, Yin-Hua
Xu, Ling
Ye, Jing-Ming
Intraoperative radiotherapy versus whole-breast external beam radiotherapy, and other factors associated with the prognosis of early breast cancer treated with breast-conserving surgery and radiotherapy: a retrospective study from SEER database
title Intraoperative radiotherapy versus whole-breast external beam radiotherapy, and other factors associated with the prognosis of early breast cancer treated with breast-conserving surgery and radiotherapy: a retrospective study from SEER database
title_full Intraoperative radiotherapy versus whole-breast external beam radiotherapy, and other factors associated with the prognosis of early breast cancer treated with breast-conserving surgery and radiotherapy: a retrospective study from SEER database
title_fullStr Intraoperative radiotherapy versus whole-breast external beam radiotherapy, and other factors associated with the prognosis of early breast cancer treated with breast-conserving surgery and radiotherapy: a retrospective study from SEER database
title_full_unstemmed Intraoperative radiotherapy versus whole-breast external beam radiotherapy, and other factors associated with the prognosis of early breast cancer treated with breast-conserving surgery and radiotherapy: a retrospective study from SEER database
title_short Intraoperative radiotherapy versus whole-breast external beam radiotherapy, and other factors associated with the prognosis of early breast cancer treated with breast-conserving surgery and radiotherapy: a retrospective study from SEER database
title_sort intraoperative radiotherapy versus whole-breast external beam radiotherapy, and other factors associated with the prognosis of early breast cancer treated with breast-conserving surgery and radiotherapy: a retrospective study from seer database
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8798017/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35117317
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tcr-20-2441
work_keys_str_mv AT sunmingshuai intraoperativeradiotherapyversuswholebreastexternalbeamradiotherapyandotherfactorsassociatedwiththeprognosisofearlybreastcancertreatedwithbreastconservingsurgeryandradiotherapyaretrospectivestudyfromseerdatabase
AT liuhongjin intraoperativeradiotherapyversuswholebreastexternalbeamradiotherapyandotherfactorsassociatedwiththeprognosisofearlybreastcancertreatedwithbreastconservingsurgeryandradiotherapyaretrospectivestudyfromseerdatabase
AT liuyinhua intraoperativeradiotherapyversuswholebreastexternalbeamradiotherapyandotherfactorsassociatedwiththeprognosisofearlybreastcancertreatedwithbreastconservingsurgeryandradiotherapyaretrospectivestudyfromseerdatabase
AT xuling intraoperativeradiotherapyversuswholebreastexternalbeamradiotherapyandotherfactorsassociatedwiththeprognosisofearlybreastcancertreatedwithbreastconservingsurgeryandradiotherapyaretrospectivestudyfromseerdatabase
AT yejingming intraoperativeradiotherapyversuswholebreastexternalbeamradiotherapyandotherfactorsassociatedwiththeprognosisofearlybreastcancertreatedwithbreastconservingsurgeryandradiotherapyaretrospectivestudyfromseerdatabase