Cargando…

Clinical pathological analysis of newly diagnosed malignant pelvic tumors during pregnancy

BACKGROUND: This study sought to investigate the pathological and clinical characteristics of newly developed malignant pelvic tumors during pregnancy. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted of 20 patients with newly developed malignant pelvic tumors during pregnancy who were admitted to ho...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jiang, Ying, Zhao, Jing, Ding, Ling, Li, Jinfeng, Wang, Shuzhen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AME Publishing Company 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8798235/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35116605
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tcr-21-717
_version_ 1784641751499145216
author Jiang, Ying
Zhao, Jing
Ding, Ling
Li, Jinfeng
Wang, Shuzhen
author_facet Jiang, Ying
Zhao, Jing
Ding, Ling
Li, Jinfeng
Wang, Shuzhen
author_sort Jiang, Ying
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: This study sought to investigate the pathological and clinical characteristics of newly developed malignant pelvic tumors during pregnancy. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted of 20 patients with newly developed malignant pelvic tumors during pregnancy who were admitted to hospital from January 1, 2012 to March 31, 2020. The patients were grouped according to the histological tumor source, evaluated using a chi-square test and Kaplan-Meier analysis, and their clinical and pathological characteristics were examined. RESULTS: Of the 20 patients, 14 had primary tumors and 6 had metastatic tumors. The average age of the patients in the metastatic tumor group was higher than that of patients in the primary tumor group (P=0.038). Notably, patients in both groups were at an advanced tumor stage when they were diagnosed. A significant difference between the 2 groups (P<0.001) was found in the clinical presents and the outcomes. The survival rates of the 2 groups differed significantly (P<0.001). Patients in the primary tumor group all survived without tumors. Conversely, only 1 patient in the metastatic tumor group survived without a tumor during the follow-up period, and 5 patients in this group did not survive. The metastatic rates of the examined placentas were 1/6 and 3/5 for the primary and metastatic tumor groups, respectively (P=0.545). The histological distribution of the newly developed malignant pelvic tumors during pregnancy was diverse, and different to those in the non-pregnancy period. Additionally, 6 patients had metastatic tumors, and the proportion of metastatic tumors was significantly higher than that of non-pregnancy patients (P<0.001; 3.53% vs. 30%). Of the 8 patients with primary ovarian tumors, 5 had borderline tumors (62.5%), and the proportion of borderline tumors was significantly higher than that of non-pregnant patients (9.61% vs. 5/8) in the same period. CONCLUSIONS: Newly diagnosed malignant pelvic tumors during pregnancy were different from the non-pregnant in the tissue origin, pathological grade, clinical presenting, and outcomes. The metastatic tumors pose a serious threat to the lives and health of pregnant women
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8798235
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher AME Publishing Company
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87982352022-02-02 Clinical pathological analysis of newly diagnosed malignant pelvic tumors during pregnancy Jiang, Ying Zhao, Jing Ding, Ling Li, Jinfeng Wang, Shuzhen Transl Cancer Res Original Article BACKGROUND: This study sought to investigate the pathological and clinical characteristics of newly developed malignant pelvic tumors during pregnancy. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted of 20 patients with newly developed malignant pelvic tumors during pregnancy who were admitted to hospital from January 1, 2012 to March 31, 2020. The patients were grouped according to the histological tumor source, evaluated using a chi-square test and Kaplan-Meier analysis, and their clinical and pathological characteristics were examined. RESULTS: Of the 20 patients, 14 had primary tumors and 6 had metastatic tumors. The average age of the patients in the metastatic tumor group was higher than that of patients in the primary tumor group (P=0.038). Notably, patients in both groups were at an advanced tumor stage when they were diagnosed. A significant difference between the 2 groups (P<0.001) was found in the clinical presents and the outcomes. The survival rates of the 2 groups differed significantly (P<0.001). Patients in the primary tumor group all survived without tumors. Conversely, only 1 patient in the metastatic tumor group survived without a tumor during the follow-up period, and 5 patients in this group did not survive. The metastatic rates of the examined placentas were 1/6 and 3/5 for the primary and metastatic tumor groups, respectively (P=0.545). The histological distribution of the newly developed malignant pelvic tumors during pregnancy was diverse, and different to those in the non-pregnancy period. Additionally, 6 patients had metastatic tumors, and the proportion of metastatic tumors was significantly higher than that of non-pregnancy patients (P<0.001; 3.53% vs. 30%). Of the 8 patients with primary ovarian tumors, 5 had borderline tumors (62.5%), and the proportion of borderline tumors was significantly higher than that of non-pregnant patients (9.61% vs. 5/8) in the same period. CONCLUSIONS: Newly diagnosed malignant pelvic tumors during pregnancy were different from the non-pregnant in the tissue origin, pathological grade, clinical presenting, and outcomes. The metastatic tumors pose a serious threat to the lives and health of pregnant women AME Publishing Company 2021-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8798235/ /pubmed/35116605 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tcr-21-717 Text en 2021 Translational Cancer Research. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Article
Jiang, Ying
Zhao, Jing
Ding, Ling
Li, Jinfeng
Wang, Shuzhen
Clinical pathological analysis of newly diagnosed malignant pelvic tumors during pregnancy
title Clinical pathological analysis of newly diagnosed malignant pelvic tumors during pregnancy
title_full Clinical pathological analysis of newly diagnosed malignant pelvic tumors during pregnancy
title_fullStr Clinical pathological analysis of newly diagnosed malignant pelvic tumors during pregnancy
title_full_unstemmed Clinical pathological analysis of newly diagnosed malignant pelvic tumors during pregnancy
title_short Clinical pathological analysis of newly diagnosed malignant pelvic tumors during pregnancy
title_sort clinical pathological analysis of newly diagnosed malignant pelvic tumors during pregnancy
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8798235/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35116605
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tcr-21-717
work_keys_str_mv AT jiangying clinicalpathologicalanalysisofnewlydiagnosedmalignantpelvictumorsduringpregnancy
AT zhaojing clinicalpathologicalanalysisofnewlydiagnosedmalignantpelvictumorsduringpregnancy
AT dingling clinicalpathologicalanalysisofnewlydiagnosedmalignantpelvictumorsduringpregnancy
AT lijinfeng clinicalpathologicalanalysisofnewlydiagnosedmalignantpelvictumorsduringpregnancy
AT wangshuzhen clinicalpathologicalanalysisofnewlydiagnosedmalignantpelvictumorsduringpregnancy