Cargando…

Pituitary adenoma or pituitary neuroendocrine tumor: a narrative review of controversy and perspective

In 1932, Harvey Cushing first proposed pituitary adenoma (PA) as the term for the cause of acromegaly. After nearly 90 years of research, PA is recognized as the second most common intracranial neoplasm. Most PAs can be easily cured or controlled by conventional therapies, including surgery, medical...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liu, Xiaohai, Wang, Renzhi, Li, Mingchu, Chen, Ge
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AME Publishing Company 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8798339/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35116513
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tcr-20-3446
_version_ 1784641780937916416
author Liu, Xiaohai
Wang, Renzhi
Li, Mingchu
Chen, Ge
author_facet Liu, Xiaohai
Wang, Renzhi
Li, Mingchu
Chen, Ge
author_sort Liu, Xiaohai
collection PubMed
description In 1932, Harvey Cushing first proposed pituitary adenoma (PA) as the term for the cause of acromegaly. After nearly 90 years of research, PA is recognized as the second most common intracranial neoplasm. Most PAs can be easily cured or controlled by conventional therapies, including surgery, medical treatment or radiotherapy. However, nearly 40% of PAs are invasive, and some adenomas show aggressive behavior, with rapid growth patterns and resistance to conventional treatments, which leads to a poor prognosis; this type of adenoma is called aggressive or refractory PA. For a very small proportion of PAs (approximately 0.2%), subarachnoid or systemic metastasis may develop, at which point it is considered malignant and called pituitary carcinoma. Based on distinctions regarding the biological behaviors of adenoma, aggressive adenoma and pituitary carcinoma, the International Pituitary Pathology Club in 2016 formally proposed new terminology for PA: pituitary neuroendocrine tumor (PitNET). Over the last three years, an increasing number of relevant articles have used the term PitNET in place of PA. Interestingly, the fourth edition of the WHO classification of PA released in 2017 did not adopt this nomenclature, and the Pituitary Society published a paper in 2019 suggesting that the new nomenclature does not improve clinical diagnosis or treatment and confuses patients more than the PA terminology. The Pituitary Society insists on using the term PA, as PAs with aggressive behavior only account for a very small proportion of all PAs. Overall, the new terminology may cause significant and unnecessary patient anxiety and confusion. Here, we describe the current perspectives and bases of the two naming methods and offer our opinions on maintaining the original naming system for PA. Nevertheless, early diagnosis and intensive treatment of aggressive PAs is extremely important for improving patient prognosis, regardless of the nomenclature.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8798339
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher AME Publishing Company
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87983392022-02-02 Pituitary adenoma or pituitary neuroendocrine tumor: a narrative review of controversy and perspective Liu, Xiaohai Wang, Renzhi Li, Mingchu Chen, Ge Transl Cancer Res Review Article In 1932, Harvey Cushing first proposed pituitary adenoma (PA) as the term for the cause of acromegaly. After nearly 90 years of research, PA is recognized as the second most common intracranial neoplasm. Most PAs can be easily cured or controlled by conventional therapies, including surgery, medical treatment or radiotherapy. However, nearly 40% of PAs are invasive, and some adenomas show aggressive behavior, with rapid growth patterns and resistance to conventional treatments, which leads to a poor prognosis; this type of adenoma is called aggressive or refractory PA. For a very small proportion of PAs (approximately 0.2%), subarachnoid or systemic metastasis may develop, at which point it is considered malignant and called pituitary carcinoma. Based on distinctions regarding the biological behaviors of adenoma, aggressive adenoma and pituitary carcinoma, the International Pituitary Pathology Club in 2016 formally proposed new terminology for PA: pituitary neuroendocrine tumor (PitNET). Over the last three years, an increasing number of relevant articles have used the term PitNET in place of PA. Interestingly, the fourth edition of the WHO classification of PA released in 2017 did not adopt this nomenclature, and the Pituitary Society published a paper in 2019 suggesting that the new nomenclature does not improve clinical diagnosis or treatment and confuses patients more than the PA terminology. The Pituitary Society insists on using the term PA, as PAs with aggressive behavior only account for a very small proportion of all PAs. Overall, the new terminology may cause significant and unnecessary patient anxiety and confusion. Here, we describe the current perspectives and bases of the two naming methods and offer our opinions on maintaining the original naming system for PA. Nevertheless, early diagnosis and intensive treatment of aggressive PAs is extremely important for improving patient prognosis, regardless of the nomenclature. AME Publishing Company 2021-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8798339/ /pubmed/35116513 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tcr-20-3446 Text en 2021 Translational Cancer Research. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.
spellingShingle Review Article
Liu, Xiaohai
Wang, Renzhi
Li, Mingchu
Chen, Ge
Pituitary adenoma or pituitary neuroendocrine tumor: a narrative review of controversy and perspective
title Pituitary adenoma or pituitary neuroendocrine tumor: a narrative review of controversy and perspective
title_full Pituitary adenoma or pituitary neuroendocrine tumor: a narrative review of controversy and perspective
title_fullStr Pituitary adenoma or pituitary neuroendocrine tumor: a narrative review of controversy and perspective
title_full_unstemmed Pituitary adenoma or pituitary neuroendocrine tumor: a narrative review of controversy and perspective
title_short Pituitary adenoma or pituitary neuroendocrine tumor: a narrative review of controversy and perspective
title_sort pituitary adenoma or pituitary neuroendocrine tumor: a narrative review of controversy and perspective
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8798339/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35116513
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tcr-20-3446
work_keys_str_mv AT liuxiaohai pituitaryadenomaorpituitaryneuroendocrinetumoranarrativereviewofcontroversyandperspective
AT wangrenzhi pituitaryadenomaorpituitaryneuroendocrinetumoranarrativereviewofcontroversyandperspective
AT limingchu pituitaryadenomaorpituitaryneuroendocrinetumoranarrativereviewofcontroversyandperspective
AT chenge pituitaryadenomaorpituitaryneuroendocrinetumoranarrativereviewofcontroversyandperspective