Cargando…

Circulating tumor DNA use in a community oncology practice

BACKGROUND: This retrospective single center study aimed to describe circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) utilization in a community practice for patients with advanced solid tumors. METHODS: All patients were included who were seen at the Scripps Hillcrest Oncology Cl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chamberlain, Erin D., Costantini, Carrie L., Xavier, Marin F.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AME Publishing Company 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8798503/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35116787
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tcr.2019.03.15
_version_ 1784641823263686656
author Chamberlain, Erin D.
Costantini, Carrie L.
Xavier, Marin F.
author_facet Chamberlain, Erin D.
Costantini, Carrie L.
Xavier, Marin F.
author_sort Chamberlain, Erin D.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: This retrospective single center study aimed to describe circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) utilization in a community practice for patients with advanced solid tumors. METHODS: All patients were included who were seen at the Scripps Hillcrest Oncology Clinic (San Diego, CA, USA) between September 2016 to March 2018 who had ctDNA assay testing performed. In this cohort, all ctDNA testing was performed to aid therapeutic decision making with wide variety in both the type of advanced solid tumor, as well as the line of therapy. RESULTS: Of the assays performed in the 41 patients included in this review, 42% of therapeutic actions following ctDNA assay results were influenced by the ctDNA result, including initiation of the corresponding Federal Drug Administration (FDA) approved therapy, placement on clinical trial, and initiation of off label-targeted options. In addition, CGP results guided clinicians away from futile or harmful treatments, such as EGFR inhibition in colorectal cancer patients with discovered KRAS mutations. No additional prognostic or therapeutic information was gathered in one quarter of patients for which ctDNA was drawn. Furthermore, discovered genomic alterations by ctDNA testing did not influence therapeutic action in 58% of cases. CONCLUSIONS: These results highlight the conundrum that having additional information regarding an individual’s tumor biology does not yet translate into meaningful targeted therapy in the majority of cases. Further studies are needed regarding ctDNA utilization to help guide community oncologists who will continue to face the choice between targeted therapy, immunotherapy, and cytotoxic chemotherapy as science advances.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8798503
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher AME Publishing Company
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87985032022-02-02 Circulating tumor DNA use in a community oncology practice Chamberlain, Erin D. Costantini, Carrie L. Xavier, Marin F. Transl Cancer Res Original Article BACKGROUND: This retrospective single center study aimed to describe circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) utilization in a community practice for patients with advanced solid tumors. METHODS: All patients were included who were seen at the Scripps Hillcrest Oncology Clinic (San Diego, CA, USA) between September 2016 to March 2018 who had ctDNA assay testing performed. In this cohort, all ctDNA testing was performed to aid therapeutic decision making with wide variety in both the type of advanced solid tumor, as well as the line of therapy. RESULTS: Of the assays performed in the 41 patients included in this review, 42% of therapeutic actions following ctDNA assay results were influenced by the ctDNA result, including initiation of the corresponding Federal Drug Administration (FDA) approved therapy, placement on clinical trial, and initiation of off label-targeted options. In addition, CGP results guided clinicians away from futile or harmful treatments, such as EGFR inhibition in colorectal cancer patients with discovered KRAS mutations. No additional prognostic or therapeutic information was gathered in one quarter of patients for which ctDNA was drawn. Furthermore, discovered genomic alterations by ctDNA testing did not influence therapeutic action in 58% of cases. CONCLUSIONS: These results highlight the conundrum that having additional information regarding an individual’s tumor biology does not yet translate into meaningful targeted therapy in the majority of cases. Further studies are needed regarding ctDNA utilization to help guide community oncologists who will continue to face the choice between targeted therapy, immunotherapy, and cytotoxic chemotherapy as science advances. AME Publishing Company 2019-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8798503/ /pubmed/35116787 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tcr.2019.03.15 Text en 2019 Translational Cancer Research. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Article
Chamberlain, Erin D.
Costantini, Carrie L.
Xavier, Marin F.
Circulating tumor DNA use in a community oncology practice
title Circulating tumor DNA use in a community oncology practice
title_full Circulating tumor DNA use in a community oncology practice
title_fullStr Circulating tumor DNA use in a community oncology practice
title_full_unstemmed Circulating tumor DNA use in a community oncology practice
title_short Circulating tumor DNA use in a community oncology practice
title_sort circulating tumor dna use in a community oncology practice
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8798503/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35116787
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tcr.2019.03.15
work_keys_str_mv AT chamberlainerind circulatingtumordnauseinacommunityoncologypractice
AT costantinicarriel circulatingtumordnauseinacommunityoncologypractice
AT xaviermarinf circulatingtumordnauseinacommunityoncologypractice