Cargando…
Neoadjuvant systemic therapy does not compromise local control after breast-conserving surgery: a single-center, propensity score matching study in China
BACKGROUND: To investigate ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) in patients who have undergone breast-conserving surgery (BCS) after neoadjuvant systematic therapy (NST). METHOD: Three hundred and twenty-one patients undergoing BCS after NST and 2,534 patients undergoing initial BCS from June...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
AME Publishing Company
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8798631/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35117169 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tcr.2019.11.23 |
_version_ | 1784641855082725376 |
---|---|
author | Yang, Fan Wu, Si-Yu Mo, Miao Xiao, Qin Yang, Xia Liu, Ying-Ying Li, Jian-Wei Shao, Zhi-Ming Liu, Guang-Yu |
author_facet | Yang, Fan Wu, Si-Yu Mo, Miao Xiao, Qin Yang, Xia Liu, Ying-Ying Li, Jian-Wei Shao, Zhi-Ming Liu, Guang-Yu |
author_sort | Yang, Fan |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: To investigate ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) in patients who have undergone breast-conserving surgery (BCS) after neoadjuvant systematic therapy (NST). METHOD: Three hundred and twenty-one patients undergoing BCS after NST and 2,534 patients undergoing initial BCS from June 2008 to June 2017 at Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center were retrospectively enrolled, and statistical analyses, including propensity score matching, were applied to compare IBTR-free survival. The main factors related to IBTR in the NST group were estimated utilizing univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: After propensity score matching, the 3-year IBTR-free survival rates were 93.7% (95% CI, 90.6–96.8%) in the NST group and 96.9% (95% CI, 94.9–98.9%) in the matched initial BCS group at a median follow-up period of 58 months. IBTR-free survival did not differ statistically between the two groups (P=0.154). According to multivariate analysis in the NST group, tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status and pathologic ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) constituent were the factors related to IBTR after BCS. CONCLUSIONS: BCS after NST and initial BCS have equivalent IBTR-free survival. BCS after NST is a safe and effective therapy in terms of IBTR. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8798631 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | AME Publishing Company |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87986312022-02-02 Neoadjuvant systemic therapy does not compromise local control after breast-conserving surgery: a single-center, propensity score matching study in China Yang, Fan Wu, Si-Yu Mo, Miao Xiao, Qin Yang, Xia Liu, Ying-Ying Li, Jian-Wei Shao, Zhi-Ming Liu, Guang-Yu Transl Cancer Res Original Article BACKGROUND: To investigate ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) in patients who have undergone breast-conserving surgery (BCS) after neoadjuvant systematic therapy (NST). METHOD: Three hundred and twenty-one patients undergoing BCS after NST and 2,534 patients undergoing initial BCS from June 2008 to June 2017 at Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center were retrospectively enrolled, and statistical analyses, including propensity score matching, were applied to compare IBTR-free survival. The main factors related to IBTR in the NST group were estimated utilizing univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: After propensity score matching, the 3-year IBTR-free survival rates were 93.7% (95% CI, 90.6–96.8%) in the NST group and 96.9% (95% CI, 94.9–98.9%) in the matched initial BCS group at a median follow-up period of 58 months. IBTR-free survival did not differ statistically between the two groups (P=0.154). According to multivariate analysis in the NST group, tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status and pathologic ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) constituent were the factors related to IBTR after BCS. CONCLUSIONS: BCS after NST and initial BCS have equivalent IBTR-free survival. BCS after NST is a safe and effective therapy in terms of IBTR. AME Publishing Company 2020-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8798631/ /pubmed/35117169 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tcr.2019.11.23 Text en 2020 Translational Cancer Research. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Yang, Fan Wu, Si-Yu Mo, Miao Xiao, Qin Yang, Xia Liu, Ying-Ying Li, Jian-Wei Shao, Zhi-Ming Liu, Guang-Yu Neoadjuvant systemic therapy does not compromise local control after breast-conserving surgery: a single-center, propensity score matching study in China |
title | Neoadjuvant systemic therapy does not compromise local control after breast-conserving surgery: a single-center, propensity score matching study in China |
title_full | Neoadjuvant systemic therapy does not compromise local control after breast-conserving surgery: a single-center, propensity score matching study in China |
title_fullStr | Neoadjuvant systemic therapy does not compromise local control after breast-conserving surgery: a single-center, propensity score matching study in China |
title_full_unstemmed | Neoadjuvant systemic therapy does not compromise local control after breast-conserving surgery: a single-center, propensity score matching study in China |
title_short | Neoadjuvant systemic therapy does not compromise local control after breast-conserving surgery: a single-center, propensity score matching study in China |
title_sort | neoadjuvant systemic therapy does not compromise local control after breast-conserving surgery: a single-center, propensity score matching study in china |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8798631/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35117169 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tcr.2019.11.23 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yangfan neoadjuvantsystemictherapydoesnotcompromiselocalcontrolafterbreastconservingsurgeryasinglecenterpropensityscorematchingstudyinchina AT wusiyu neoadjuvantsystemictherapydoesnotcompromiselocalcontrolafterbreastconservingsurgeryasinglecenterpropensityscorematchingstudyinchina AT momiao neoadjuvantsystemictherapydoesnotcompromiselocalcontrolafterbreastconservingsurgeryasinglecenterpropensityscorematchingstudyinchina AT xiaoqin neoadjuvantsystemictherapydoesnotcompromiselocalcontrolafterbreastconservingsurgeryasinglecenterpropensityscorematchingstudyinchina AT yangxia neoadjuvantsystemictherapydoesnotcompromiselocalcontrolafterbreastconservingsurgeryasinglecenterpropensityscorematchingstudyinchina AT liuyingying neoadjuvantsystemictherapydoesnotcompromiselocalcontrolafterbreastconservingsurgeryasinglecenterpropensityscorematchingstudyinchina AT lijianwei neoadjuvantsystemictherapydoesnotcompromiselocalcontrolafterbreastconservingsurgeryasinglecenterpropensityscorematchingstudyinchina AT shaozhiming neoadjuvantsystemictherapydoesnotcompromiselocalcontrolafterbreastconservingsurgeryasinglecenterpropensityscorematchingstudyinchina AT liuguangyu neoadjuvantsystemictherapydoesnotcompromiselocalcontrolafterbreastconservingsurgeryasinglecenterpropensityscorematchingstudyinchina |