Cargando…

Outcome evaluation of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with stage IB2 or IIA cervical cancer: a retrospective comparative study

BACKGROUND: To study the benefits of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) in addition to surgical resection and postoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in patients with stage IB2 or IIA cervical cancer. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 363 patients with stage IB2 or IIA cervical cancer that received th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yan, Wenxing, Qiu, Shuang, Si, Lihui, Ding, Yaming, Zhang, Qi, Liu, Linlin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AME Publishing Company 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8798654/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35117536
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tcr.2020.02.27
_version_ 1784641860682121216
author Yan, Wenxing
Qiu, Shuang
Si, Lihui
Ding, Yaming
Zhang, Qi
Liu, Linlin
author_facet Yan, Wenxing
Qiu, Shuang
Si, Lihui
Ding, Yaming
Zhang, Qi
Liu, Linlin
author_sort Yan, Wenxing
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To study the benefits of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) in addition to surgical resection and postoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in patients with stage IB2 or IIA cervical cancer. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 363 patients with stage IB2 or IIA cervical cancer that received the surgical resection and postoperative CRT with or without NACT at the Second Hospital of Jilin University between February 2014 and December 2016. We chose mortality as the primary outcome, and the clinical deterioration as secondary outcome. These outcomes were compared between two groups of patients with or without NACT by univariate or multivariate logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Among the 363 identified patients, 114 patients were in the neoadjuvant group and 249 patients in the non-neoadjuvant group. The median follow-up period was 36.4 months, ranging from 28 to 55 months. There were statistically significant differences in the tumor differentiation, clinical stages, vascular tumor thrombus, and postoperative radiotherapy between these two group patients. After adjusting for these variables, patients in the neoadjuvant group had a statistically significantly lower survival rate than those in the non-neoadjuvant group within one year after the treatment, but this difference disappeared at the 3-year follow-up period. Also, more patients in the neoadjuvant group experienced clinical deterioration at the 3-year follow-up period. CONCLUSIONS: NACT did not show significant benefits in mortality and clinical deterioration in patients with stage IB2 or IIA cervical cancer.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8798654
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher AME Publishing Company
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87986542022-02-02 Outcome evaluation of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with stage IB2 or IIA cervical cancer: a retrospective comparative study Yan, Wenxing Qiu, Shuang Si, Lihui Ding, Yaming Zhang, Qi Liu, Linlin Transl Cancer Res Original Article BACKGROUND: To study the benefits of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) in addition to surgical resection and postoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in patients with stage IB2 or IIA cervical cancer. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 363 patients with stage IB2 or IIA cervical cancer that received the surgical resection and postoperative CRT with or without NACT at the Second Hospital of Jilin University between February 2014 and December 2016. We chose mortality as the primary outcome, and the clinical deterioration as secondary outcome. These outcomes were compared between two groups of patients with or without NACT by univariate or multivariate logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Among the 363 identified patients, 114 patients were in the neoadjuvant group and 249 patients in the non-neoadjuvant group. The median follow-up period was 36.4 months, ranging from 28 to 55 months. There were statistically significant differences in the tumor differentiation, clinical stages, vascular tumor thrombus, and postoperative radiotherapy between these two group patients. After adjusting for these variables, patients in the neoadjuvant group had a statistically significantly lower survival rate than those in the non-neoadjuvant group within one year after the treatment, but this difference disappeared at the 3-year follow-up period. Also, more patients in the neoadjuvant group experienced clinical deterioration at the 3-year follow-up period. CONCLUSIONS: NACT did not show significant benefits in mortality and clinical deterioration in patients with stage IB2 or IIA cervical cancer. AME Publishing Company 2020-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8798654/ /pubmed/35117536 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tcr.2020.02.27 Text en 2020 Translational Cancer Research. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Article
Yan, Wenxing
Qiu, Shuang
Si, Lihui
Ding, Yaming
Zhang, Qi
Liu, Linlin
Outcome evaluation of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with stage IB2 or IIA cervical cancer: a retrospective comparative study
title Outcome evaluation of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with stage IB2 or IIA cervical cancer: a retrospective comparative study
title_full Outcome evaluation of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with stage IB2 or IIA cervical cancer: a retrospective comparative study
title_fullStr Outcome evaluation of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with stage IB2 or IIA cervical cancer: a retrospective comparative study
title_full_unstemmed Outcome evaluation of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with stage IB2 or IIA cervical cancer: a retrospective comparative study
title_short Outcome evaluation of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with stage IB2 or IIA cervical cancer: a retrospective comparative study
title_sort outcome evaluation of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with stage ib2 or iia cervical cancer: a retrospective comparative study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8798654/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35117536
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tcr.2020.02.27
work_keys_str_mv AT yanwenxing outcomeevaluationofneoadjuvantchemotherapyinpatientswithstageib2oriiacervicalcanceraretrospectivecomparativestudy
AT qiushuang outcomeevaluationofneoadjuvantchemotherapyinpatientswithstageib2oriiacervicalcanceraretrospectivecomparativestudy
AT silihui outcomeevaluationofneoadjuvantchemotherapyinpatientswithstageib2oriiacervicalcanceraretrospectivecomparativestudy
AT dingyaming outcomeevaluationofneoadjuvantchemotherapyinpatientswithstageib2oriiacervicalcanceraretrospectivecomparativestudy
AT zhangqi outcomeevaluationofneoadjuvantchemotherapyinpatientswithstageib2oriiacervicalcanceraretrospectivecomparativestudy
AT liulinlin outcomeevaluationofneoadjuvantchemotherapyinpatientswithstageib2oriiacervicalcanceraretrospectivecomparativestudy