Cargando…

Reconsidering the therapeutic use for vacuum-assisted breast biopsy in breast cancer patients: a retrospective single-center study

BACKGROUND: The management of breast cancer has evolved over the last few decades, with needle biopsy interventions now including vacuum-assisted breast biopsy (VABB). Previous studies have examined the utility of VABB for diagnosing breast diseases, although it remains unclear whether VABB is safe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhao, Jialin, Wang, Xuejing, Xu, Ying, Peng, Li, Sun, Qiang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AME Publishing Company 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8798766/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35117755
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tcr-19-2906
_version_ 1784641892143595520
author Zhao, Jialin
Wang, Xuejing
Xu, Ying
Peng, Li
Sun, Qiang
author_facet Zhao, Jialin
Wang, Xuejing
Xu, Ying
Peng, Li
Sun, Qiang
author_sort Zhao, Jialin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The management of breast cancer has evolved over the last few decades, with needle biopsy interventions now including vacuum-assisted breast biopsy (VABB). Previous studies have examined the utility of VABB for diagnosing breast diseases, although it remains unclear whether VABB is safe and effective for breast cancer. This study evaluated the residual tumor rate and prognosis of breast cancer patients who underwent VABB-based resection. METHODS: This single-center retrospective study evaluated data of 89 Chinese female patients who underwent VABB between January 2011 and December 2018 and had confirmed malignancy on pathological diagnosis. All patients had complete clinical, treatment, and follow-up records. Outcomes were compared according to whether there was residual tumor after the VABB, as well as the time from the VABB to the surgery. RESULTS: Residual tumor was detected for 62 of the 89 patients (69.6%). When we compared the residual and non-residual groups, we detected significant differences in the ultrasonography-determined diameter (P=0.002) and morphology (P=0.000) of tumor bed after VABB. T classification was also significantly different in the residual and non-residual groups (P=0.001). However, no significant differences were observed when we compared the resected and residual tumors histopathologically (all P>0.05). We did not detect significant differences in disease-free survival (DFS) when we compared the residual and non-residual groups over a median follow-up time of 52.3 months. However, in the residual group, a longer time to surgery after VABB (>31 days) was associated with significantly shorter DFS. CONCLUSIONS: While previous studies have indicated that VABB can be used for early breast cancer, we observed a residual tumor rate of 69.6%, which is consistent with previously reported results. If there is a strong suspicion of breast cancer based on the preoperative examination, the surgeon must be careful to reduce the risk of residual tumor whenever possible, and should also consider performing standard surgery after VABB.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8798766
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher AME Publishing Company
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87987662022-02-02 Reconsidering the therapeutic use for vacuum-assisted breast biopsy in breast cancer patients: a retrospective single-center study Zhao, Jialin Wang, Xuejing Xu, Ying Peng, Li Sun, Qiang Transl Cancer Res Original Article BACKGROUND: The management of breast cancer has evolved over the last few decades, with needle biopsy interventions now including vacuum-assisted breast biopsy (VABB). Previous studies have examined the utility of VABB for diagnosing breast diseases, although it remains unclear whether VABB is safe and effective for breast cancer. This study evaluated the residual tumor rate and prognosis of breast cancer patients who underwent VABB-based resection. METHODS: This single-center retrospective study evaluated data of 89 Chinese female patients who underwent VABB between January 2011 and December 2018 and had confirmed malignancy on pathological diagnosis. All patients had complete clinical, treatment, and follow-up records. Outcomes were compared according to whether there was residual tumor after the VABB, as well as the time from the VABB to the surgery. RESULTS: Residual tumor was detected for 62 of the 89 patients (69.6%). When we compared the residual and non-residual groups, we detected significant differences in the ultrasonography-determined diameter (P=0.002) and morphology (P=0.000) of tumor bed after VABB. T classification was also significantly different in the residual and non-residual groups (P=0.001). However, no significant differences were observed when we compared the resected and residual tumors histopathologically (all P>0.05). We did not detect significant differences in disease-free survival (DFS) when we compared the residual and non-residual groups over a median follow-up time of 52.3 months. However, in the residual group, a longer time to surgery after VABB (>31 days) was associated with significantly shorter DFS. CONCLUSIONS: While previous studies have indicated that VABB can be used for early breast cancer, we observed a residual tumor rate of 69.6%, which is consistent with previously reported results. If there is a strong suspicion of breast cancer based on the preoperative examination, the surgeon must be careful to reduce the risk of residual tumor whenever possible, and should also consider performing standard surgery after VABB. AME Publishing Company 2020-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8798766/ /pubmed/35117755 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tcr-19-2906 Text en 2020 Translational Cancer Research. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Article
Zhao, Jialin
Wang, Xuejing
Xu, Ying
Peng, Li
Sun, Qiang
Reconsidering the therapeutic use for vacuum-assisted breast biopsy in breast cancer patients: a retrospective single-center study
title Reconsidering the therapeutic use for vacuum-assisted breast biopsy in breast cancer patients: a retrospective single-center study
title_full Reconsidering the therapeutic use for vacuum-assisted breast biopsy in breast cancer patients: a retrospective single-center study
title_fullStr Reconsidering the therapeutic use for vacuum-assisted breast biopsy in breast cancer patients: a retrospective single-center study
title_full_unstemmed Reconsidering the therapeutic use for vacuum-assisted breast biopsy in breast cancer patients: a retrospective single-center study
title_short Reconsidering the therapeutic use for vacuum-assisted breast biopsy in breast cancer patients: a retrospective single-center study
title_sort reconsidering the therapeutic use for vacuum-assisted breast biopsy in breast cancer patients: a retrospective single-center study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8798766/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35117755
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tcr-19-2906
work_keys_str_mv AT zhaojialin reconsideringthetherapeuticuseforvacuumassistedbreastbiopsyinbreastcancerpatientsaretrospectivesinglecenterstudy
AT wangxuejing reconsideringthetherapeuticuseforvacuumassistedbreastbiopsyinbreastcancerpatientsaretrospectivesinglecenterstudy
AT xuying reconsideringthetherapeuticuseforvacuumassistedbreastbiopsyinbreastcancerpatientsaretrospectivesinglecenterstudy
AT pengli reconsideringthetherapeuticuseforvacuumassistedbreastbiopsyinbreastcancerpatientsaretrospectivesinglecenterstudy
AT sunqiang reconsideringthetherapeuticuseforvacuumassistedbreastbiopsyinbreastcancerpatientsaretrospectivesinglecenterstudy