Cargando…

Different primers for diagnosing circulating cell-free DNA of colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND: Cell-free DNA (cfDNA) primers have been designed to screen for cancer diagnosis, but the results have been inconsistent. The study aimed to compare different primers for diagnosing cfDNA of colorectal cancer (CRC). METHODS: Peripheral blood specimens were collected from 71 patients with...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shi, Hao, Li, Qigang, Liao, Juan, Bai, Lian, Wu, Shuai, Xie, Jian, He, Gan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AME Publishing Company 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8798792/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35117709
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tcr-19-2017
_version_ 1784641899419664384
author Shi, Hao
Li, Qigang
Liao, Juan
Bai, Lian
Wu, Shuai
Xie, Jian
He, Gan
author_facet Shi, Hao
Li, Qigang
Liao, Juan
Bai, Lian
Wu, Shuai
Xie, Jian
He, Gan
author_sort Shi, Hao
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Cell-free DNA (cfDNA) primers have been designed to screen for cancer diagnosis, but the results have been inconsistent. The study aimed to compare different primers for diagnosing cfDNA of colorectal cancer (CRC). METHODS: Peripheral blood specimens were collected from 71 patients with CRC and 20 patients with proliferative intestinal polyps. Quantitative polymerase chain reaction (q-PCR) was used to detect the concentration of cfDNA of these primers, including ALU elements (ALU), Beta-actin (ACTB), and glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH). The receiver operator characteristic curve (ROC) was performed to analyze the diagnostic value. RESULTS: The concentration of cfDNA in plasma of the CRC group determined by primers ALU and GAPDH was significantly higher than that of the intestinal polyp group (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in cfDNA level determined by primer ACTB between the CRC group and the intestinal polyp group (P>0.05). The area under curves (AUCs) of ALU, GAPDH, and ACTB were 0.734, 0.800, and 0.503, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The GAPDH and ALU in plasma are expected to be sensitive indicators for the diagnosis of CRC.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8798792
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher AME Publishing Company
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87987922022-02-02 Different primers for diagnosing circulating cell-free DNA of colorectal cancer Shi, Hao Li, Qigang Liao, Juan Bai, Lian Wu, Shuai Xie, Jian He, Gan Transl Cancer Res Original Article BACKGROUND: Cell-free DNA (cfDNA) primers have been designed to screen for cancer diagnosis, but the results have been inconsistent. The study aimed to compare different primers for diagnosing cfDNA of colorectal cancer (CRC). METHODS: Peripheral blood specimens were collected from 71 patients with CRC and 20 patients with proliferative intestinal polyps. Quantitative polymerase chain reaction (q-PCR) was used to detect the concentration of cfDNA of these primers, including ALU elements (ALU), Beta-actin (ACTB), and glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH). The receiver operator characteristic curve (ROC) was performed to analyze the diagnostic value. RESULTS: The concentration of cfDNA in plasma of the CRC group determined by primers ALU and GAPDH was significantly higher than that of the intestinal polyp group (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in cfDNA level determined by primer ACTB between the CRC group and the intestinal polyp group (P>0.05). The area under curves (AUCs) of ALU, GAPDH, and ACTB were 0.734, 0.800, and 0.503, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The GAPDH and ALU in plasma are expected to be sensitive indicators for the diagnosis of CRC. AME Publishing Company 2020-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8798792/ /pubmed/35117709 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tcr-19-2017 Text en 2020 Translational Cancer Research. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Article
Shi, Hao
Li, Qigang
Liao, Juan
Bai, Lian
Wu, Shuai
Xie, Jian
He, Gan
Different primers for diagnosing circulating cell-free DNA of colorectal cancer
title Different primers for diagnosing circulating cell-free DNA of colorectal cancer
title_full Different primers for diagnosing circulating cell-free DNA of colorectal cancer
title_fullStr Different primers for diagnosing circulating cell-free DNA of colorectal cancer
title_full_unstemmed Different primers for diagnosing circulating cell-free DNA of colorectal cancer
title_short Different primers for diagnosing circulating cell-free DNA of colorectal cancer
title_sort different primers for diagnosing circulating cell-free dna of colorectal cancer
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8798792/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35117709
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tcr-19-2017
work_keys_str_mv AT shihao differentprimersfordiagnosingcirculatingcellfreednaofcolorectalcancer
AT liqigang differentprimersfordiagnosingcirculatingcellfreednaofcolorectalcancer
AT liaojuan differentprimersfordiagnosingcirculatingcellfreednaofcolorectalcancer
AT bailian differentprimersfordiagnosingcirculatingcellfreednaofcolorectalcancer
AT wushuai differentprimersfordiagnosingcirculatingcellfreednaofcolorectalcancer
AT xiejian differentprimersfordiagnosingcirculatingcellfreednaofcolorectalcancer
AT hegan differentprimersfordiagnosingcirculatingcellfreednaofcolorectalcancer