Cargando…

Risk of esophageal adenocarcinoma in patients with Barrett’s esophagus using proton pump inhibitors: a systematic review with meta-analysis and sequential trial analysis

BACKGROUND: Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) have been used to treat Barrett’s esophagus (BE), but there seems to be insufficient evidence that PPIs can prevent esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) and high grade dysplasia (HGD). This study aimed to evaluate the effects of PPIs in BE patients. METHODS: PubM...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Lunan, Cao, Zhongsheng, Zhang, Chenjing, Pan, Wensheng
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AME Publishing Company 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8798809/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35116488
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tcr-20-3362
_version_ 1784641903817392128
author Li, Lunan
Cao, Zhongsheng
Zhang, Chenjing
Pan, Wensheng
author_facet Li, Lunan
Cao, Zhongsheng
Zhang, Chenjing
Pan, Wensheng
author_sort Li, Lunan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) have been used to treat Barrett’s esophagus (BE), but there seems to be insufficient evidence that PPIs can prevent esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) and high grade dysplasia (HGD). This study aimed to evaluate the effects of PPIs in BE patients. METHODS: PubMed and EMBASE were systematically searched. Stata13 and trial sequential analysis (TSA) software were used to carry out related statistics. Pooled odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. RESULTS: Using PPIs to reduce the incidence of EAC and HGD has not been confirmed (OR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.29–1.26). The pooled results of three cohort studies reported that PPIs use was protective (OR 0.48; 95% CI, 0.33–0.70). But the pooled results of five case-control study indicating PPIs use does not prove this protective effect (OR 0.73; 95% CI, 0.21–2.48). On pooled analysis of 4 US studies 2 Netherlands, protective effect on development of EAC and HGD was noted (OR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.43–0.80) and (OR, 0.16; 95% CI, 0.03–0.75). CONCLUSIONS: According to the Meta analysis and TSA of existing studies, the protective effect of PPIs on the progression of BE patients to EAC and/or HGD has not been confirmed. TSA shows that more patients are needed before a clear conclusion can be reached.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8798809
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher AME Publishing Company
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87988092022-02-02 Risk of esophageal adenocarcinoma in patients with Barrett’s esophagus using proton pump inhibitors: a systematic review with meta-analysis and sequential trial analysis Li, Lunan Cao, Zhongsheng Zhang, Chenjing Pan, Wensheng Transl Cancer Res Original Article BACKGROUND: Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) have been used to treat Barrett’s esophagus (BE), but there seems to be insufficient evidence that PPIs can prevent esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) and high grade dysplasia (HGD). This study aimed to evaluate the effects of PPIs in BE patients. METHODS: PubMed and EMBASE were systematically searched. Stata13 and trial sequential analysis (TSA) software were used to carry out related statistics. Pooled odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. RESULTS: Using PPIs to reduce the incidence of EAC and HGD has not been confirmed (OR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.29–1.26). The pooled results of three cohort studies reported that PPIs use was protective (OR 0.48; 95% CI, 0.33–0.70). But the pooled results of five case-control study indicating PPIs use does not prove this protective effect (OR 0.73; 95% CI, 0.21–2.48). On pooled analysis of 4 US studies 2 Netherlands, protective effect on development of EAC and HGD was noted (OR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.43–0.80) and (OR, 0.16; 95% CI, 0.03–0.75). CONCLUSIONS: According to the Meta analysis and TSA of existing studies, the protective effect of PPIs on the progression of BE patients to EAC and/or HGD has not been confirmed. TSA shows that more patients are needed before a clear conclusion can be reached. AME Publishing Company 2021-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8798809/ /pubmed/35116488 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tcr-20-3362 Text en 2021 Translational Cancer Research. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Article
Li, Lunan
Cao, Zhongsheng
Zhang, Chenjing
Pan, Wensheng
Risk of esophageal adenocarcinoma in patients with Barrett’s esophagus using proton pump inhibitors: a systematic review with meta-analysis and sequential trial analysis
title Risk of esophageal adenocarcinoma in patients with Barrett’s esophagus using proton pump inhibitors: a systematic review with meta-analysis and sequential trial analysis
title_full Risk of esophageal adenocarcinoma in patients with Barrett’s esophagus using proton pump inhibitors: a systematic review with meta-analysis and sequential trial analysis
title_fullStr Risk of esophageal adenocarcinoma in patients with Barrett’s esophagus using proton pump inhibitors: a systematic review with meta-analysis and sequential trial analysis
title_full_unstemmed Risk of esophageal adenocarcinoma in patients with Barrett’s esophagus using proton pump inhibitors: a systematic review with meta-analysis and sequential trial analysis
title_short Risk of esophageal adenocarcinoma in patients with Barrett’s esophagus using proton pump inhibitors: a systematic review with meta-analysis and sequential trial analysis
title_sort risk of esophageal adenocarcinoma in patients with barrett’s esophagus using proton pump inhibitors: a systematic review with meta-analysis and sequential trial analysis
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8798809/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35116488
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tcr-20-3362
work_keys_str_mv AT lilunan riskofesophagealadenocarcinomainpatientswithbarrettsesophagususingprotonpumpinhibitorsasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysisandsequentialtrialanalysis
AT caozhongsheng riskofesophagealadenocarcinomainpatientswithbarrettsesophagususingprotonpumpinhibitorsasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysisandsequentialtrialanalysis
AT zhangchenjing riskofesophagealadenocarcinomainpatientswithbarrettsesophagususingprotonpumpinhibitorsasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysisandsequentialtrialanalysis
AT panwensheng riskofesophagealadenocarcinomainpatientswithbarrettsesophagususingprotonpumpinhibitorsasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysisandsequentialtrialanalysis