Cargando…

Clinicopathological features and outcomes of major salivary gland mucoepidermoid carcinoma: do they vary in different age groups

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to analyze clinicopathological characteristics and prognostic value of age stratification for in patients with major salivary gland mucoepidermoid carcinoma (MSG-MEC). METHODS: MSG-MEC patients were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Yujiao, Hu, Chaosu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AME Publishing Company 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8798934/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35117279
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tcr-20-2197
_version_ 1784641942886285312
author Li, Yujiao
Hu, Chaosu
author_facet Li, Yujiao
Hu, Chaosu
author_sort Li, Yujiao
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to analyze clinicopathological characteristics and prognostic value of age stratification for in patients with major salivary gland mucoepidermoid carcinoma (MSG-MEC). METHODS: MSG-MEC patients were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database between 2010 and 2014. We examined the clinicopathological variables using Chi-squared tests. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to determine the effects of each variable on survival. RESULTS: A total of 729 patients were analyzed. Younger patients tended to be female and present with low grade disease and less-advanced N classification (P<0.05). In multivariate analyses, the patients aged 5–19 had better survival rates, and the risk of death became higher with increasing age. Compared to patients aged 80–95-years-old, the hazard ratios for patients aged 5–19, 20–29, 30–39, 40–49, 50–59, 60–69 and 70–79 years old were 0.000 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.000–>1,000), 0.187 (95% CI: 0.041–0.854), 0.172 (95% CI: 0.039–0.771), 0.006 (95% CI: 0.010–0.361), 0.310 (95% CI: 0.140–0.685), 0.541 (95% CI: 0.261–1.121) and 0.440 (95% CI: 0.230–0.840), respectively. Subgroups analysis shows that the effect of advancing age was significantly associated with a higher risk of poor survival in Caucasian who harbored N0 classification (P<0.001), non-metastatic disease (P<0.001) or received surgery (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Younger patients tended to be female and present with low grade disease and less-advanced N classification. The risk of death became higher with increasing age. However, when considering patients affected by more aggressive disease, age was not significantly associated with higher risk of dying from MSG-MEC. In high-risk patients, tumor characteristics rather than age should be considered when making treatment decisions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8798934
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher AME Publishing Company
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87989342022-02-02 Clinicopathological features and outcomes of major salivary gland mucoepidermoid carcinoma: do they vary in different age groups Li, Yujiao Hu, Chaosu Transl Cancer Res Original Article BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to analyze clinicopathological characteristics and prognostic value of age stratification for in patients with major salivary gland mucoepidermoid carcinoma (MSG-MEC). METHODS: MSG-MEC patients were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database between 2010 and 2014. We examined the clinicopathological variables using Chi-squared tests. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to determine the effects of each variable on survival. RESULTS: A total of 729 patients were analyzed. Younger patients tended to be female and present with low grade disease and less-advanced N classification (P<0.05). In multivariate analyses, the patients aged 5–19 had better survival rates, and the risk of death became higher with increasing age. Compared to patients aged 80–95-years-old, the hazard ratios for patients aged 5–19, 20–29, 30–39, 40–49, 50–59, 60–69 and 70–79 years old were 0.000 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.000–>1,000), 0.187 (95% CI: 0.041–0.854), 0.172 (95% CI: 0.039–0.771), 0.006 (95% CI: 0.010–0.361), 0.310 (95% CI: 0.140–0.685), 0.541 (95% CI: 0.261–1.121) and 0.440 (95% CI: 0.230–0.840), respectively. Subgroups analysis shows that the effect of advancing age was significantly associated with a higher risk of poor survival in Caucasian who harbored N0 classification (P<0.001), non-metastatic disease (P<0.001) or received surgery (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Younger patients tended to be female and present with low grade disease and less-advanced N classification. The risk of death became higher with increasing age. However, when considering patients affected by more aggressive disease, age was not significantly associated with higher risk of dying from MSG-MEC. In high-risk patients, tumor characteristics rather than age should be considered when making treatment decisions. AME Publishing Company 2020-11 /pmc/articles/PMC8798934/ /pubmed/35117279 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tcr-20-2197 Text en 2020 Translational Cancer Research. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Article
Li, Yujiao
Hu, Chaosu
Clinicopathological features and outcomes of major salivary gland mucoepidermoid carcinoma: do they vary in different age groups
title Clinicopathological features and outcomes of major salivary gland mucoepidermoid carcinoma: do they vary in different age groups
title_full Clinicopathological features and outcomes of major salivary gland mucoepidermoid carcinoma: do they vary in different age groups
title_fullStr Clinicopathological features and outcomes of major salivary gland mucoepidermoid carcinoma: do they vary in different age groups
title_full_unstemmed Clinicopathological features and outcomes of major salivary gland mucoepidermoid carcinoma: do they vary in different age groups
title_short Clinicopathological features and outcomes of major salivary gland mucoepidermoid carcinoma: do they vary in different age groups
title_sort clinicopathological features and outcomes of major salivary gland mucoepidermoid carcinoma: do they vary in different age groups
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8798934/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35117279
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tcr-20-2197
work_keys_str_mv AT liyujiao clinicopathologicalfeaturesandoutcomesofmajorsalivaryglandmucoepidermoidcarcinomadotheyvaryindifferentagegroups
AT huchaosu clinicopathologicalfeaturesandoutcomesofmajorsalivaryglandmucoepidermoidcarcinomadotheyvaryindifferentagegroups