Cargando…
Effect and feasibility of uniportal thoracoscopic surgery in the treatment of early-stage lung cancer in a primary hospital
BACKGROUND: Thoracoscopic radical lobectomy is a routine procedure for radical surgery of lung cancer. Meanwhile, thoracoscopic surgery has been gradually transformed from assisted small incision and multiport thoracoscopic radical surgery to uniportal thoracoscopic surgery for treatment of early-st...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
AME Publishing Company
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8799098/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35116654 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tcr-21-1002 |
_version_ | 1784641986209251328 |
---|---|
author | Zuo, Xiaoping Liu, Guofeng Liu, Xiaochuan Feng, Yongjian Zhang, Haijun |
author_facet | Zuo, Xiaoping Liu, Guofeng Liu, Xiaochuan Feng, Yongjian Zhang, Haijun |
author_sort | Zuo, Xiaoping |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Thoracoscopic radical lobectomy is a routine procedure for radical surgery of lung cancer. Meanwhile, thoracoscopic surgery has been gradually transformed from assisted small incision and multiport thoracoscopic radical surgery to uniportal thoracoscopic surgery for treatment of early-stage lung cancers. However, there are still controversies regarding the efficacy and feasibility of 2 surgical methods. The purpose of this study is to investigate the effect and feasibility of uniportal thoracoscopic surgery for treatment of early-stage lung cancer in a primary hospital. METHODS: Clinical data of 142 patients with early-stage lung cancer were retrospectively chosen in the period from September 2019 to March 2021 in our hospital and divided into 2 groups: a control group (66 patients) with 3-port thoracoscopic radical surgery and an experimental group (76 patients) with uniportal thoracoscopic radical surgery. The baseline clinical data, perioperative clinical data, and lymph node dissection of 2 groups were compared. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in baseline general clinical data between 2 groups (P>0.05), and no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative complications, conversion rate, or operation time between 2 groups (P>0.05). The intraoperative blood loss volume, postoperative chest drainage volume, postoperative hospitalization time, and postoperative catheter time of experimental group were significantly lower than those of control group (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the total number of lymph node dissection stations and lymph node dissections, the number of N2 lymph node dissection stations, or N2 lymph node dissections between 2 groups (P>0.05). There was also no significant difference in the number of left and right lymph node dissection stations between 2 groups (P>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with 3-port thoracoscopic radical surgery, uniportal thoracoscopic radical surgery in the treatment of patients with early-stage lung cancer provides the same effect of lymph node dissection and has advantages in reducing surgical trauma and accelerating postoperative rehabilitation, popularizing for use in primary hospitals. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8799098 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | AME Publishing Company |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87990982022-02-02 Effect and feasibility of uniportal thoracoscopic surgery in the treatment of early-stage lung cancer in a primary hospital Zuo, Xiaoping Liu, Guofeng Liu, Xiaochuan Feng, Yongjian Zhang, Haijun Transl Cancer Res Original Article BACKGROUND: Thoracoscopic radical lobectomy is a routine procedure for radical surgery of lung cancer. Meanwhile, thoracoscopic surgery has been gradually transformed from assisted small incision and multiport thoracoscopic radical surgery to uniportal thoracoscopic surgery for treatment of early-stage lung cancers. However, there are still controversies regarding the efficacy and feasibility of 2 surgical methods. The purpose of this study is to investigate the effect and feasibility of uniportal thoracoscopic surgery for treatment of early-stage lung cancer in a primary hospital. METHODS: Clinical data of 142 patients with early-stage lung cancer were retrospectively chosen in the period from September 2019 to March 2021 in our hospital and divided into 2 groups: a control group (66 patients) with 3-port thoracoscopic radical surgery and an experimental group (76 patients) with uniportal thoracoscopic radical surgery. The baseline clinical data, perioperative clinical data, and lymph node dissection of 2 groups were compared. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in baseline general clinical data between 2 groups (P>0.05), and no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative complications, conversion rate, or operation time between 2 groups (P>0.05). The intraoperative blood loss volume, postoperative chest drainage volume, postoperative hospitalization time, and postoperative catheter time of experimental group were significantly lower than those of control group (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the total number of lymph node dissection stations and lymph node dissections, the number of N2 lymph node dissection stations, or N2 lymph node dissections between 2 groups (P>0.05). There was also no significant difference in the number of left and right lymph node dissection stations between 2 groups (P>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with 3-port thoracoscopic radical surgery, uniportal thoracoscopic radical surgery in the treatment of patients with early-stage lung cancer provides the same effect of lymph node dissection and has advantages in reducing surgical trauma and accelerating postoperative rehabilitation, popularizing for use in primary hospitals. AME Publishing Company 2021-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8799098/ /pubmed/35116654 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tcr-21-1002 Text en 2021 Translational Cancer Research. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Zuo, Xiaoping Liu, Guofeng Liu, Xiaochuan Feng, Yongjian Zhang, Haijun Effect and feasibility of uniportal thoracoscopic surgery in the treatment of early-stage lung cancer in a primary hospital |
title | Effect and feasibility of uniportal thoracoscopic surgery in the treatment of early-stage lung cancer in a primary hospital |
title_full | Effect and feasibility of uniportal thoracoscopic surgery in the treatment of early-stage lung cancer in a primary hospital |
title_fullStr | Effect and feasibility of uniportal thoracoscopic surgery in the treatment of early-stage lung cancer in a primary hospital |
title_full_unstemmed | Effect and feasibility of uniportal thoracoscopic surgery in the treatment of early-stage lung cancer in a primary hospital |
title_short | Effect and feasibility of uniportal thoracoscopic surgery in the treatment of early-stage lung cancer in a primary hospital |
title_sort | effect and feasibility of uniportal thoracoscopic surgery in the treatment of early-stage lung cancer in a primary hospital |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8799098/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35116654 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tcr-21-1002 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zuoxiaoping effectandfeasibilityofuniportalthoracoscopicsurgeryinthetreatmentofearlystagelungcancerinaprimaryhospital AT liuguofeng effectandfeasibilityofuniportalthoracoscopicsurgeryinthetreatmentofearlystagelungcancerinaprimaryhospital AT liuxiaochuan effectandfeasibilityofuniportalthoracoscopicsurgeryinthetreatmentofearlystagelungcancerinaprimaryhospital AT fengyongjian effectandfeasibilityofuniportalthoracoscopicsurgeryinthetreatmentofearlystagelungcancerinaprimaryhospital AT zhanghaijun effectandfeasibilityofuniportalthoracoscopicsurgeryinthetreatmentofearlystagelungcancerinaprimaryhospital |