Cargando…

Effect of prone and supine treatment positions for postoperative treatment of rectal cancer on target dose coverage and small bowel sparing using intensity-modulated radiation therapy

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the influence of patient positioning on target dose coverage and dose distribution to the small bowel in intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for rectal cancer patients. METHODS: Twenty-four consecutive rectal cancer patients undergoing postoperative radiation were se...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yang, Yongqiang, Cai, Shang, Zhao, Tianshu, Peng, Qiliang, Qian, Jianjun, Tian, Ye
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AME Publishing Company 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8799155/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35117393
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tcr.2019.11.33
_version_ 1784642000098689024
author Yang, Yongqiang
Cai, Shang
Zhao, Tianshu
Peng, Qiliang
Qian, Jianjun
Tian, Ye
author_facet Yang, Yongqiang
Cai, Shang
Zhao, Tianshu
Peng, Qiliang
Qian, Jianjun
Tian, Ye
author_sort Yang, Yongqiang
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To evaluate the influence of patient positioning on target dose coverage and dose distribution to the small bowel in intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for rectal cancer patients. METHODS: Twenty-four consecutive rectal cancer patients undergoing postoperative radiation were selected and set up in either a prone or supine position. All patients received computed tomography (CT) scans before and during treatment (1–4 weeks). The CT images were defined as plan, 1W, 2W, 3W, or 4W. The plan, 1W, 2W, 3W and 4W CT images were fused. The clinical target volume (CTV) and planning target volume (PTV) delineated on the plan CT were copied onto the 1–4W CT. The treatment plans based on the plan CT were also copied onto the 1–4W CT. The target dose coverage rate was assessed. The couch-position data of the linear accelerator were acquired. RESULTS: Failure rates of the CTV and PTV target dose coverage were higher in the prone group than in the supine group (18.60% vs. 0% and 69.76% vs. 53.65%) during the treatment. The total couch-position deviation for the prone group (1.23±0.76 cm) was significantly greater than that of the supine group (0.28±0.18 cm; P=0.001). Compared with the supine group, the prone group had significantly less irradiated small bowel volume at V5 (P=0.003) and V10 (P=0.004). CONCLUSIONS: The supine position maintained better target dose coverage and setup reproducibility in rectal cancer patients treated with IMRT. The prone position combined with the belly board can reduce the dose received by the small bowel.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8799155
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher AME Publishing Company
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87991552022-02-02 Effect of prone and supine treatment positions for postoperative treatment of rectal cancer on target dose coverage and small bowel sparing using intensity-modulated radiation therapy Yang, Yongqiang Cai, Shang Zhao, Tianshu Peng, Qiliang Qian, Jianjun Tian, Ye Transl Cancer Res Original Article BACKGROUND: To evaluate the influence of patient positioning on target dose coverage and dose distribution to the small bowel in intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for rectal cancer patients. METHODS: Twenty-four consecutive rectal cancer patients undergoing postoperative radiation were selected and set up in either a prone or supine position. All patients received computed tomography (CT) scans before and during treatment (1–4 weeks). The CT images were defined as plan, 1W, 2W, 3W, or 4W. The plan, 1W, 2W, 3W and 4W CT images were fused. The clinical target volume (CTV) and planning target volume (PTV) delineated on the plan CT were copied onto the 1–4W CT. The treatment plans based on the plan CT were also copied onto the 1–4W CT. The target dose coverage rate was assessed. The couch-position data of the linear accelerator were acquired. RESULTS: Failure rates of the CTV and PTV target dose coverage were higher in the prone group than in the supine group (18.60% vs. 0% and 69.76% vs. 53.65%) during the treatment. The total couch-position deviation for the prone group (1.23±0.76 cm) was significantly greater than that of the supine group (0.28±0.18 cm; P=0.001). Compared with the supine group, the prone group had significantly less irradiated small bowel volume at V5 (P=0.003) and V10 (P=0.004). CONCLUSIONS: The supine position maintained better target dose coverage and setup reproducibility in rectal cancer patients treated with IMRT. The prone position combined with the belly board can reduce the dose received by the small bowel. AME Publishing Company 2020-02 /pmc/articles/PMC8799155/ /pubmed/35117393 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tcr.2019.11.33 Text en 2020 Translational Cancer Research. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Article
Yang, Yongqiang
Cai, Shang
Zhao, Tianshu
Peng, Qiliang
Qian, Jianjun
Tian, Ye
Effect of prone and supine treatment positions for postoperative treatment of rectal cancer on target dose coverage and small bowel sparing using intensity-modulated radiation therapy
title Effect of prone and supine treatment positions for postoperative treatment of rectal cancer on target dose coverage and small bowel sparing using intensity-modulated radiation therapy
title_full Effect of prone and supine treatment positions for postoperative treatment of rectal cancer on target dose coverage and small bowel sparing using intensity-modulated radiation therapy
title_fullStr Effect of prone and supine treatment positions for postoperative treatment of rectal cancer on target dose coverage and small bowel sparing using intensity-modulated radiation therapy
title_full_unstemmed Effect of prone and supine treatment positions for postoperative treatment of rectal cancer on target dose coverage and small bowel sparing using intensity-modulated radiation therapy
title_short Effect of prone and supine treatment positions for postoperative treatment of rectal cancer on target dose coverage and small bowel sparing using intensity-modulated radiation therapy
title_sort effect of prone and supine treatment positions for postoperative treatment of rectal cancer on target dose coverage and small bowel sparing using intensity-modulated radiation therapy
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8799155/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35117393
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tcr.2019.11.33
work_keys_str_mv AT yangyongqiang effectofproneandsupinetreatmentpositionsforpostoperativetreatmentofrectalcancerontargetdosecoverageandsmallbowelsparingusingintensitymodulatedradiationtherapy
AT caishang effectofproneandsupinetreatmentpositionsforpostoperativetreatmentofrectalcancerontargetdosecoverageandsmallbowelsparingusingintensitymodulatedradiationtherapy
AT zhaotianshu effectofproneandsupinetreatmentpositionsforpostoperativetreatmentofrectalcancerontargetdosecoverageandsmallbowelsparingusingintensitymodulatedradiationtherapy
AT pengqiliang effectofproneandsupinetreatmentpositionsforpostoperativetreatmentofrectalcancerontargetdosecoverageandsmallbowelsparingusingintensitymodulatedradiationtherapy
AT qianjianjun effectofproneandsupinetreatmentpositionsforpostoperativetreatmentofrectalcancerontargetdosecoverageandsmallbowelsparingusingintensitymodulatedradiationtherapy
AT tianye effectofproneandsupinetreatmentpositionsforpostoperativetreatmentofrectalcancerontargetdosecoverageandsmallbowelsparingusingintensitymodulatedradiationtherapy