Cargando…

Comparison of the effect on the prognosis of HCC in terms of different surgical approaches for hepatic inflow occlusion

BACKGROUND: To investigate the effect of surgical approaches for hepatic inflow occlusion performed during hepatectomy on postoperative tumor-free survival (TFS) in patients treated with R0 resection. METHODS: In total, 343 hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients who underwent hepatectomy (R0) with...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Hong-Hao, Ma, Liang, Xiang, Bang-De, Qi, Lu-Nan, Li, Le-Qun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AME Publishing Company 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8799281/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35116893
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tcr.2019.07.44
_version_ 1784642034610470912
author Li, Hong-Hao
Ma, Liang
Xiang, Bang-De
Qi, Lu-Nan
Li, Le-Qun
author_facet Li, Hong-Hao
Ma, Liang
Xiang, Bang-De
Qi, Lu-Nan
Li, Le-Qun
author_sort Li, Hong-Hao
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To investigate the effect of surgical approaches for hepatic inflow occlusion performed during hepatectomy on postoperative tumor-free survival (TFS) in patients treated with R0 resection. METHODS: In total, 343 hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients who underwent hepatectomy (R0) with different surgical approaches for hepatic inflow occlusion were analyzed retrospectively. RESULTS: In total, 68.80% of the patients underwent hepatic inflow occlusion, including 46.65% with a routine Pringle maneuver and 22.16% with selective hemi-hepatic vascular exclusion (SHVE), during surgery. The TFS did not significantly differ among the Pringle group, the SHVE group and the no hepatic inflow occlusion group. After further stratifying the patients according to the Barcelona clinic liver cancer (BCLC) staging system, the patients with BCLC stage A disease in the SHVE group and no hepatic inflow occlusion group displayed better TFS than those in the Pringle maneuver group (P=0.04; P=0.002), but the patients with BCLC stage B–C disease did not show significant differences among the groups. Furthermore, all 214 patients with BCLC stage A disease were classified into two subgroups according to the microvascular invasion (MVI) status. Interestingly, among the patients with MVI, those in the SHVE group and no hepatic inflow occlusion group had significantly longer TFS than those in the Pringle group (P=0.025; P=0.006); however, the patients without MVI did not show differences among the groups. Additionally, the multivariate analysis revealed that a tumor size ≥5 cm, an absent capsule, a low Edmondson grade, MVI positivity and performance of the Pringle maneuver were independent risk factors of the prognosis in patients with BCLC stage A disease. CONCLUSIONS: Hepatic inflow occlusion and the surgical approach used to address this issue may have an impact on HCC prognosis in patients with BCLC stage A disease, especially among those with MVI positivity. No hepatic inflow occlusion or an SHVE approach rather than the Pringle maneuver should be considered first during hepatectomy for patients with BCLC stage A disease.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8799281
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher AME Publishing Company
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87992812022-02-02 Comparison of the effect on the prognosis of HCC in terms of different surgical approaches for hepatic inflow occlusion Li, Hong-Hao Ma, Liang Xiang, Bang-De Qi, Lu-Nan Li, Le-Qun Transl Cancer Res Original Article BACKGROUND: To investigate the effect of surgical approaches for hepatic inflow occlusion performed during hepatectomy on postoperative tumor-free survival (TFS) in patients treated with R0 resection. METHODS: In total, 343 hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients who underwent hepatectomy (R0) with different surgical approaches for hepatic inflow occlusion were analyzed retrospectively. RESULTS: In total, 68.80% of the patients underwent hepatic inflow occlusion, including 46.65% with a routine Pringle maneuver and 22.16% with selective hemi-hepatic vascular exclusion (SHVE), during surgery. The TFS did not significantly differ among the Pringle group, the SHVE group and the no hepatic inflow occlusion group. After further stratifying the patients according to the Barcelona clinic liver cancer (BCLC) staging system, the patients with BCLC stage A disease in the SHVE group and no hepatic inflow occlusion group displayed better TFS than those in the Pringle maneuver group (P=0.04; P=0.002), but the patients with BCLC stage B–C disease did not show significant differences among the groups. Furthermore, all 214 patients with BCLC stage A disease were classified into two subgroups according to the microvascular invasion (MVI) status. Interestingly, among the patients with MVI, those in the SHVE group and no hepatic inflow occlusion group had significantly longer TFS than those in the Pringle group (P=0.025; P=0.006); however, the patients without MVI did not show differences among the groups. Additionally, the multivariate analysis revealed that a tumor size ≥5 cm, an absent capsule, a low Edmondson grade, MVI positivity and performance of the Pringle maneuver were independent risk factors of the prognosis in patients with BCLC stage A disease. CONCLUSIONS: Hepatic inflow occlusion and the surgical approach used to address this issue may have an impact on HCC prognosis in patients with BCLC stage A disease, especially among those with MVI positivity. No hepatic inflow occlusion or an SHVE approach rather than the Pringle maneuver should be considered first during hepatectomy for patients with BCLC stage A disease. AME Publishing Company 2019-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8799281/ /pubmed/35116893 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tcr.2019.07.44 Text en 2019 Translational Cancer Research. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Article
Li, Hong-Hao
Ma, Liang
Xiang, Bang-De
Qi, Lu-Nan
Li, Le-Qun
Comparison of the effect on the prognosis of HCC in terms of different surgical approaches for hepatic inflow occlusion
title Comparison of the effect on the prognosis of HCC in terms of different surgical approaches for hepatic inflow occlusion
title_full Comparison of the effect on the prognosis of HCC in terms of different surgical approaches for hepatic inflow occlusion
title_fullStr Comparison of the effect on the prognosis of HCC in terms of different surgical approaches for hepatic inflow occlusion
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the effect on the prognosis of HCC in terms of different surgical approaches for hepatic inflow occlusion
title_short Comparison of the effect on the prognosis of HCC in terms of different surgical approaches for hepatic inflow occlusion
title_sort comparison of the effect on the prognosis of hcc in terms of different surgical approaches for hepatic inflow occlusion
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8799281/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35116893
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tcr.2019.07.44
work_keys_str_mv AT lihonghao comparisonoftheeffectontheprognosisofhccintermsofdifferentsurgicalapproachesforhepaticinflowocclusion
AT maliang comparisonoftheeffectontheprognosisofhccintermsofdifferentsurgicalapproachesforhepaticinflowocclusion
AT xiangbangde comparisonoftheeffectontheprognosisofhccintermsofdifferentsurgicalapproachesforhepaticinflowocclusion
AT qilunan comparisonoftheeffectontheprognosisofhccintermsofdifferentsurgicalapproachesforhepaticinflowocclusion
AT lilequn comparisonoftheeffectontheprognosisofhccintermsofdifferentsurgicalapproachesforhepaticinflowocclusion