Cargando…
Comparison of the effect on the prognosis of HCC in terms of different surgical approaches for hepatic inflow occlusion
BACKGROUND: To investigate the effect of surgical approaches for hepatic inflow occlusion performed during hepatectomy on postoperative tumor-free survival (TFS) in patients treated with R0 resection. METHODS: In total, 343 hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients who underwent hepatectomy (R0) with...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
AME Publishing Company
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8799281/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35116893 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tcr.2019.07.44 |
_version_ | 1784642034610470912 |
---|---|
author | Li, Hong-Hao Ma, Liang Xiang, Bang-De Qi, Lu-Nan Li, Le-Qun |
author_facet | Li, Hong-Hao Ma, Liang Xiang, Bang-De Qi, Lu-Nan Li, Le-Qun |
author_sort | Li, Hong-Hao |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: To investigate the effect of surgical approaches for hepatic inflow occlusion performed during hepatectomy on postoperative tumor-free survival (TFS) in patients treated with R0 resection. METHODS: In total, 343 hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients who underwent hepatectomy (R0) with different surgical approaches for hepatic inflow occlusion were analyzed retrospectively. RESULTS: In total, 68.80% of the patients underwent hepatic inflow occlusion, including 46.65% with a routine Pringle maneuver and 22.16% with selective hemi-hepatic vascular exclusion (SHVE), during surgery. The TFS did not significantly differ among the Pringle group, the SHVE group and the no hepatic inflow occlusion group. After further stratifying the patients according to the Barcelona clinic liver cancer (BCLC) staging system, the patients with BCLC stage A disease in the SHVE group and no hepatic inflow occlusion group displayed better TFS than those in the Pringle maneuver group (P=0.04; P=0.002), but the patients with BCLC stage B–C disease did not show significant differences among the groups. Furthermore, all 214 patients with BCLC stage A disease were classified into two subgroups according to the microvascular invasion (MVI) status. Interestingly, among the patients with MVI, those in the SHVE group and no hepatic inflow occlusion group had significantly longer TFS than those in the Pringle group (P=0.025; P=0.006); however, the patients without MVI did not show differences among the groups. Additionally, the multivariate analysis revealed that a tumor size ≥5 cm, an absent capsule, a low Edmondson grade, MVI positivity and performance of the Pringle maneuver were independent risk factors of the prognosis in patients with BCLC stage A disease. CONCLUSIONS: Hepatic inflow occlusion and the surgical approach used to address this issue may have an impact on HCC prognosis in patients with BCLC stage A disease, especially among those with MVI positivity. No hepatic inflow occlusion or an SHVE approach rather than the Pringle maneuver should be considered first during hepatectomy for patients with BCLC stage A disease. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8799281 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | AME Publishing Company |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87992812022-02-02 Comparison of the effect on the prognosis of HCC in terms of different surgical approaches for hepatic inflow occlusion Li, Hong-Hao Ma, Liang Xiang, Bang-De Qi, Lu-Nan Li, Le-Qun Transl Cancer Res Original Article BACKGROUND: To investigate the effect of surgical approaches for hepatic inflow occlusion performed during hepatectomy on postoperative tumor-free survival (TFS) in patients treated with R0 resection. METHODS: In total, 343 hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients who underwent hepatectomy (R0) with different surgical approaches for hepatic inflow occlusion were analyzed retrospectively. RESULTS: In total, 68.80% of the patients underwent hepatic inflow occlusion, including 46.65% with a routine Pringle maneuver and 22.16% with selective hemi-hepatic vascular exclusion (SHVE), during surgery. The TFS did not significantly differ among the Pringle group, the SHVE group and the no hepatic inflow occlusion group. After further stratifying the patients according to the Barcelona clinic liver cancer (BCLC) staging system, the patients with BCLC stage A disease in the SHVE group and no hepatic inflow occlusion group displayed better TFS than those in the Pringle maneuver group (P=0.04; P=0.002), but the patients with BCLC stage B–C disease did not show significant differences among the groups. Furthermore, all 214 patients with BCLC stage A disease were classified into two subgroups according to the microvascular invasion (MVI) status. Interestingly, among the patients with MVI, those in the SHVE group and no hepatic inflow occlusion group had significantly longer TFS than those in the Pringle group (P=0.025; P=0.006); however, the patients without MVI did not show differences among the groups. Additionally, the multivariate analysis revealed that a tumor size ≥5 cm, an absent capsule, a low Edmondson grade, MVI positivity and performance of the Pringle maneuver were independent risk factors of the prognosis in patients with BCLC stage A disease. CONCLUSIONS: Hepatic inflow occlusion and the surgical approach used to address this issue may have an impact on HCC prognosis in patients with BCLC stage A disease, especially among those with MVI positivity. No hepatic inflow occlusion or an SHVE approach rather than the Pringle maneuver should be considered first during hepatectomy for patients with BCLC stage A disease. AME Publishing Company 2019-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8799281/ /pubmed/35116893 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tcr.2019.07.44 Text en 2019 Translational Cancer Research. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Li, Hong-Hao Ma, Liang Xiang, Bang-De Qi, Lu-Nan Li, Le-Qun Comparison of the effect on the prognosis of HCC in terms of different surgical approaches for hepatic inflow occlusion |
title | Comparison of the effect on the prognosis of HCC in terms of different surgical approaches for hepatic inflow occlusion |
title_full | Comparison of the effect on the prognosis of HCC in terms of different surgical approaches for hepatic inflow occlusion |
title_fullStr | Comparison of the effect on the prognosis of HCC in terms of different surgical approaches for hepatic inflow occlusion |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of the effect on the prognosis of HCC in terms of different surgical approaches for hepatic inflow occlusion |
title_short | Comparison of the effect on the prognosis of HCC in terms of different surgical approaches for hepatic inflow occlusion |
title_sort | comparison of the effect on the prognosis of hcc in terms of different surgical approaches for hepatic inflow occlusion |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8799281/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35116893 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tcr.2019.07.44 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lihonghao comparisonoftheeffectontheprognosisofhccintermsofdifferentsurgicalapproachesforhepaticinflowocclusion AT maliang comparisonoftheeffectontheprognosisofhccintermsofdifferentsurgicalapproachesforhepaticinflowocclusion AT xiangbangde comparisonoftheeffectontheprognosisofhccintermsofdifferentsurgicalapproachesforhepaticinflowocclusion AT qilunan comparisonoftheeffectontheprognosisofhccintermsofdifferentsurgicalapproachesforhepaticinflowocclusion AT lilequn comparisonoftheeffectontheprognosisofhccintermsofdifferentsurgicalapproachesforhepaticinflowocclusion |