Cargando…

In Vitro Antibacterial Activity of Different Honey Samples against Clinical Isolates

BACKGROUND: The emergence of multi-drug-resistant organisms has created a lot of clinical problems. Hence, there is a need to find natural alternative treatment to counter the multi-drug-resistant organisms. Honey has a well-established usage as wound dressing in ancient and traditional medicine. OB...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Wadi, Mahasin Ahmed
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8799333/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35097108
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/1560050
_version_ 1784642046719426560
author Wadi, Mahasin Ahmed
author_facet Wadi, Mahasin Ahmed
author_sort Wadi, Mahasin Ahmed
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The emergence of multi-drug-resistant organisms has created a lot of clinical problems. Hence, there is a need to find natural alternative treatment to counter the multi-drug-resistant organisms. Honey has a well-established usage as wound dressing in ancient and traditional medicine. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to establish a baseline for the antibacterial activity of 32 global raw natural and commercial various honey samples against 8 clinical isolates. METHODS: Thirty-two honey samples (raw and commercial honey) collected from different global countries with different floral origins were tested in vitro for antibacterial activity against 8 clinical isolates collected from patients, at private hospital from Sudan, using disk diffusion technique. The following 6 epsilometer tests (Etest), amoxicillin, ciprofloxacin, cefotaxime, chloramphenicol, gentamicin, and tetracycline, were used against 8 clinical isolates for Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC). RESULTS: The following 8 clinical isolates were identified by conventional bacteriological methods: Staphylococcus aureus, (S. aureus) Escherichia coli (E. coli), Klebsiella pneumoniae (K. pneumoniae), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (P. aeruginosa), Proteus vulgaris (P. vulgaris), Salmonella Typhi (S. Typhi), Shigella sonnei (S. sonnei), and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Both raw natural and commercial honey exhibited antibacterial properties against tested Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria. The tested organisms showed low sensitivity to antibiotic Etest. CONCLUSION: All of the bacterial species studied were uniformly receptive to all raw and commercial tested honey samples; in contrast, the tested organisms showed low sensitivity to antibiotics. Commercial honey has the same antibacterial activity as the raw natural unprocessed honey against tested clinical isolates. Thus, honey is a successful alternative to conventional antibiotics as has been proved against clinical isolates.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8799333
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87993332022-01-29 In Vitro Antibacterial Activity of Different Honey Samples against Clinical Isolates Wadi, Mahasin Ahmed Biomed Res Int Research Article BACKGROUND: The emergence of multi-drug-resistant organisms has created a lot of clinical problems. Hence, there is a need to find natural alternative treatment to counter the multi-drug-resistant organisms. Honey has a well-established usage as wound dressing in ancient and traditional medicine. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to establish a baseline for the antibacterial activity of 32 global raw natural and commercial various honey samples against 8 clinical isolates. METHODS: Thirty-two honey samples (raw and commercial honey) collected from different global countries with different floral origins were tested in vitro for antibacterial activity against 8 clinical isolates collected from patients, at private hospital from Sudan, using disk diffusion technique. The following 6 epsilometer tests (Etest), amoxicillin, ciprofloxacin, cefotaxime, chloramphenicol, gentamicin, and tetracycline, were used against 8 clinical isolates for Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC). RESULTS: The following 8 clinical isolates were identified by conventional bacteriological methods: Staphylococcus aureus, (S. aureus) Escherichia coli (E. coli), Klebsiella pneumoniae (K. pneumoniae), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (P. aeruginosa), Proteus vulgaris (P. vulgaris), Salmonella Typhi (S. Typhi), Shigella sonnei (S. sonnei), and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Both raw natural and commercial honey exhibited antibacterial properties against tested Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria. The tested organisms showed low sensitivity to antibiotic Etest. CONCLUSION: All of the bacterial species studied were uniformly receptive to all raw and commercial tested honey samples; in contrast, the tested organisms showed low sensitivity to antibiotics. Commercial honey has the same antibacterial activity as the raw natural unprocessed honey against tested clinical isolates. Thus, honey is a successful alternative to conventional antibiotics as has been proved against clinical isolates. Hindawi 2022-01-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8799333/ /pubmed/35097108 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/1560050 Text en Copyright © 2022 Mahasin Ahmed Wadi. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Wadi, Mahasin Ahmed
In Vitro Antibacterial Activity of Different Honey Samples against Clinical Isolates
title In Vitro Antibacterial Activity of Different Honey Samples against Clinical Isolates
title_full In Vitro Antibacterial Activity of Different Honey Samples against Clinical Isolates
title_fullStr In Vitro Antibacterial Activity of Different Honey Samples against Clinical Isolates
title_full_unstemmed In Vitro Antibacterial Activity of Different Honey Samples against Clinical Isolates
title_short In Vitro Antibacterial Activity of Different Honey Samples against Clinical Isolates
title_sort in vitro antibacterial activity of different honey samples against clinical isolates
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8799333/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35097108
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/1560050
work_keys_str_mv AT wadimahasinahmed invitroantibacterialactivityofdifferenthoneysamplesagainstclinicalisolates