Cargando…
In Vitro Antibacterial Activity of Different Honey Samples against Clinical Isolates
BACKGROUND: The emergence of multi-drug-resistant organisms has created a lot of clinical problems. Hence, there is a need to find natural alternative treatment to counter the multi-drug-resistant organisms. Honey has a well-established usage as wound dressing in ancient and traditional medicine. OB...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8799333/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35097108 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/1560050 |
_version_ | 1784642046719426560 |
---|---|
author | Wadi, Mahasin Ahmed |
author_facet | Wadi, Mahasin Ahmed |
author_sort | Wadi, Mahasin Ahmed |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The emergence of multi-drug-resistant organisms has created a lot of clinical problems. Hence, there is a need to find natural alternative treatment to counter the multi-drug-resistant organisms. Honey has a well-established usage as wound dressing in ancient and traditional medicine. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to establish a baseline for the antibacterial activity of 32 global raw natural and commercial various honey samples against 8 clinical isolates. METHODS: Thirty-two honey samples (raw and commercial honey) collected from different global countries with different floral origins were tested in vitro for antibacterial activity against 8 clinical isolates collected from patients, at private hospital from Sudan, using disk diffusion technique. The following 6 epsilometer tests (Etest), amoxicillin, ciprofloxacin, cefotaxime, chloramphenicol, gentamicin, and tetracycline, were used against 8 clinical isolates for Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC). RESULTS: The following 8 clinical isolates were identified by conventional bacteriological methods: Staphylococcus aureus, (S. aureus) Escherichia coli (E. coli), Klebsiella pneumoniae (K. pneumoniae), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (P. aeruginosa), Proteus vulgaris (P. vulgaris), Salmonella Typhi (S. Typhi), Shigella sonnei (S. sonnei), and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Both raw natural and commercial honey exhibited antibacterial properties against tested Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria. The tested organisms showed low sensitivity to antibiotic Etest. CONCLUSION: All of the bacterial species studied were uniformly receptive to all raw and commercial tested honey samples; in contrast, the tested organisms showed low sensitivity to antibiotics. Commercial honey has the same antibacterial activity as the raw natural unprocessed honey against tested clinical isolates. Thus, honey is a successful alternative to conventional antibiotics as has been proved against clinical isolates. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8799333 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Hindawi |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87993332022-01-29 In Vitro Antibacterial Activity of Different Honey Samples against Clinical Isolates Wadi, Mahasin Ahmed Biomed Res Int Research Article BACKGROUND: The emergence of multi-drug-resistant organisms has created a lot of clinical problems. Hence, there is a need to find natural alternative treatment to counter the multi-drug-resistant organisms. Honey has a well-established usage as wound dressing in ancient and traditional medicine. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to establish a baseline for the antibacterial activity of 32 global raw natural and commercial various honey samples against 8 clinical isolates. METHODS: Thirty-two honey samples (raw and commercial honey) collected from different global countries with different floral origins were tested in vitro for antibacterial activity against 8 clinical isolates collected from patients, at private hospital from Sudan, using disk diffusion technique. The following 6 epsilometer tests (Etest), amoxicillin, ciprofloxacin, cefotaxime, chloramphenicol, gentamicin, and tetracycline, were used against 8 clinical isolates for Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC). RESULTS: The following 8 clinical isolates were identified by conventional bacteriological methods: Staphylococcus aureus, (S. aureus) Escherichia coli (E. coli), Klebsiella pneumoniae (K. pneumoniae), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (P. aeruginosa), Proteus vulgaris (P. vulgaris), Salmonella Typhi (S. Typhi), Shigella sonnei (S. sonnei), and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Both raw natural and commercial honey exhibited antibacterial properties against tested Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria. The tested organisms showed low sensitivity to antibiotic Etest. CONCLUSION: All of the bacterial species studied were uniformly receptive to all raw and commercial tested honey samples; in contrast, the tested organisms showed low sensitivity to antibiotics. Commercial honey has the same antibacterial activity as the raw natural unprocessed honey against tested clinical isolates. Thus, honey is a successful alternative to conventional antibiotics as has been proved against clinical isolates. Hindawi 2022-01-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8799333/ /pubmed/35097108 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/1560050 Text en Copyright © 2022 Mahasin Ahmed Wadi. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Wadi, Mahasin Ahmed In Vitro Antibacterial Activity of Different Honey Samples against Clinical Isolates |
title |
In Vitro Antibacterial Activity of Different Honey Samples against Clinical Isolates |
title_full |
In Vitro Antibacterial Activity of Different Honey Samples against Clinical Isolates |
title_fullStr |
In Vitro Antibacterial Activity of Different Honey Samples against Clinical Isolates |
title_full_unstemmed |
In Vitro Antibacterial Activity of Different Honey Samples against Clinical Isolates |
title_short |
In Vitro Antibacterial Activity of Different Honey Samples against Clinical Isolates |
title_sort | in vitro antibacterial activity of different honey samples against clinical isolates |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8799333/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35097108 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/1560050 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wadimahasinahmed invitroantibacterialactivityofdifferenthoneysamplesagainstclinicalisolates |