Cargando…
Denosumab in the Treatment of Osteoporosis: 10 Years Later: A Narrative Review
The fully human monoclonal antibody denosumab was approved for treatment of osteoporosis in 2010 on the basis of its potent antiresorptive activity, which produces clinically meaningful increases in bone mineral density (BMD) and reduces fracture risk at key skeletal sites. At that time, questions r...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Healthcare
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8799550/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34762286 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12325-021-01936-y |
_version_ | 1784642086325190656 |
---|---|
author | Kendler, David L. Cosman, Felicia Stad, Robert Kees Ferrari, Serge |
author_facet | Kendler, David L. Cosman, Felicia Stad, Robert Kees Ferrari, Serge |
author_sort | Kendler, David L. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The fully human monoclonal antibody denosumab was approved for treatment of osteoporosis in 2010 on the basis of its potent antiresorptive activity, which produces clinically meaningful increases in bone mineral density (BMD) and reduces fracture risk at key skeletal sites. At that time, questions remained regarding the long-term safety and efficacy of this receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa-B ligand (RANKL) inhibitor; and with clinical experience, new questions have arisen regarding its optimal use. Here, we examine these questions through the lens of data from the FREEDOM trial program and other studies to determine where denosumab fits in the osteoporosis treatment landscape. Clinical consensus and evidentiary support have grown for denosumab as a highly effective anti-osteoporosis therapy for patients at high risk of fracture. In the 10-year FREEDOM Extension study, denosumab treatment produced progressive incremental increases in BMD, sustained low rates of vertebral fracture, and further reduction in nonvertebral fracture risk without increased risk of infection, cancer, or immunogenicity. There was no evidence that suppression of bone turnover or mineralization was excessive, and rates of osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ) and atypical femoral fracture (AFF) were very low. It is now recognized, however, that transitioning to another anti-osteoporosis therapy after denosumab discontinuation is essential to mitigate a transient rebound of bone turnover causing rapid BMD loss and increased risk of multiple vertebral fractures (MVFs). Taken together, the available data show that denosumab has a favorable benefit/risk profile and is a versatile agent for preventing osteoporotic fractures in the short and long term. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12325-021-01936-y. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8799550 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer Healthcare |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87995502022-02-02 Denosumab in the Treatment of Osteoporosis: 10 Years Later: A Narrative Review Kendler, David L. Cosman, Felicia Stad, Robert Kees Ferrari, Serge Adv Ther Review The fully human monoclonal antibody denosumab was approved for treatment of osteoporosis in 2010 on the basis of its potent antiresorptive activity, which produces clinically meaningful increases in bone mineral density (BMD) and reduces fracture risk at key skeletal sites. At that time, questions remained regarding the long-term safety and efficacy of this receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa-B ligand (RANKL) inhibitor; and with clinical experience, new questions have arisen regarding its optimal use. Here, we examine these questions through the lens of data from the FREEDOM trial program and other studies to determine where denosumab fits in the osteoporosis treatment landscape. Clinical consensus and evidentiary support have grown for denosumab as a highly effective anti-osteoporosis therapy for patients at high risk of fracture. In the 10-year FREEDOM Extension study, denosumab treatment produced progressive incremental increases in BMD, sustained low rates of vertebral fracture, and further reduction in nonvertebral fracture risk without increased risk of infection, cancer, or immunogenicity. There was no evidence that suppression of bone turnover or mineralization was excessive, and rates of osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ) and atypical femoral fracture (AFF) were very low. It is now recognized, however, that transitioning to another anti-osteoporosis therapy after denosumab discontinuation is essential to mitigate a transient rebound of bone turnover causing rapid BMD loss and increased risk of multiple vertebral fractures (MVFs). Taken together, the available data show that denosumab has a favorable benefit/risk profile and is a versatile agent for preventing osteoporotic fractures in the short and long term. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12325-021-01936-y. Springer Healthcare 2021-11-11 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8799550/ /pubmed/34762286 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12325-021-01936-y Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Review Kendler, David L. Cosman, Felicia Stad, Robert Kees Ferrari, Serge Denosumab in the Treatment of Osteoporosis: 10 Years Later: A Narrative Review |
title | Denosumab in the Treatment of Osteoporosis: 10 Years Later: A Narrative Review |
title_full | Denosumab in the Treatment of Osteoporosis: 10 Years Later: A Narrative Review |
title_fullStr | Denosumab in the Treatment of Osteoporosis: 10 Years Later: A Narrative Review |
title_full_unstemmed | Denosumab in the Treatment of Osteoporosis: 10 Years Later: A Narrative Review |
title_short | Denosumab in the Treatment of Osteoporosis: 10 Years Later: A Narrative Review |
title_sort | denosumab in the treatment of osteoporosis: 10 years later: a narrative review |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8799550/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34762286 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12325-021-01936-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kendlerdavidl denosumabinthetreatmentofosteoporosis10yearslateranarrativereview AT cosmanfelicia denosumabinthetreatmentofosteoporosis10yearslateranarrativereview AT stadrobertkees denosumabinthetreatmentofosteoporosis10yearslateranarrativereview AT ferrariserge denosumabinthetreatmentofosteoporosis10yearslateranarrativereview |