Cargando…
Sensitivity of contact-tracing for COVID-19 in Thailand: a capture-recapture application
BACKGROUND: We investigate the completeness of contact tracing for COVID-19 during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in Thailand, from early January 2020 to 30 June 2020. METHODS: Uni-list capture-recapture models were applied to the frequency distributions of index cases to inform two questio...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8799986/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35093019 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-022-07046-6 |
_version_ | 1784642167007870976 |
---|---|
author | Lerdsuwansri, R. Sangnawakij, P. Böhning, D. Sansilapin, C. Chaifoo, W. Polonsky, Jonathan A. Del Rio Vilas, Victor J. |
author_facet | Lerdsuwansri, R. Sangnawakij, P. Böhning, D. Sansilapin, C. Chaifoo, W. Polonsky, Jonathan A. Del Rio Vilas, Victor J. |
author_sort | Lerdsuwansri, R. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: We investigate the completeness of contact tracing for COVID-19 during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in Thailand, from early January 2020 to 30 June 2020. METHODS: Uni-list capture-recapture models were applied to the frequency distributions of index cases to inform two questions: (1) the unobserved number of index cases with contacts, and (2) the unobserved number of index cases with secondary cases among their contacts. RESULTS: Generalized linear models (using Poisson and logistic families) did not return any significant predictor (age, sex, nationality, number of contacts per case) on the risk of transmission and hence capture-recapture models did not adjust for observed heterogeneity. Best fitting models, a zero truncated negative binomial for question 1 and zero-truncated Poisson for question 2, returned sensitivity estimates for contact tracing performance of 77.6% (95% CI = 73.75–81.54%) and 67.6% (95% CI = 53.84–81.38%), respectively. A zero-inflated negative binomial model on the distribution of index cases with secondary cases allowed the estimation of the effective reproduction number at 0.14 (95% CI = 0.09–0.22), and the overdispersion parameter at 0.1. CONCLUSION: Completeness of COVID-19 contact tracing in Thailand during the first wave appeared moderate, with around 67% of infectious transmission chains detected. Overdispersion was present suggesting that most of the index cases did not result in infectious transmission chains and the majority of transmission events stemmed from a small proportion of index cases. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8799986 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87999862022-01-31 Sensitivity of contact-tracing for COVID-19 in Thailand: a capture-recapture application Lerdsuwansri, R. Sangnawakij, P. Böhning, D. Sansilapin, C. Chaifoo, W. Polonsky, Jonathan A. Del Rio Vilas, Victor J. BMC Infect Dis Research Article BACKGROUND: We investigate the completeness of contact tracing for COVID-19 during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in Thailand, from early January 2020 to 30 June 2020. METHODS: Uni-list capture-recapture models were applied to the frequency distributions of index cases to inform two questions: (1) the unobserved number of index cases with contacts, and (2) the unobserved number of index cases with secondary cases among their contacts. RESULTS: Generalized linear models (using Poisson and logistic families) did not return any significant predictor (age, sex, nationality, number of contacts per case) on the risk of transmission and hence capture-recapture models did not adjust for observed heterogeneity. Best fitting models, a zero truncated negative binomial for question 1 and zero-truncated Poisson for question 2, returned sensitivity estimates for contact tracing performance of 77.6% (95% CI = 73.75–81.54%) and 67.6% (95% CI = 53.84–81.38%), respectively. A zero-inflated negative binomial model on the distribution of index cases with secondary cases allowed the estimation of the effective reproduction number at 0.14 (95% CI = 0.09–0.22), and the overdispersion parameter at 0.1. CONCLUSION: Completeness of COVID-19 contact tracing in Thailand during the first wave appeared moderate, with around 67% of infectious transmission chains detected. Overdispersion was present suggesting that most of the index cases did not result in infectious transmission chains and the majority of transmission events stemmed from a small proportion of index cases. BioMed Central 2022-01-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8799986/ /pubmed/35093019 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-022-07046-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Lerdsuwansri, R. Sangnawakij, P. Böhning, D. Sansilapin, C. Chaifoo, W. Polonsky, Jonathan A. Del Rio Vilas, Victor J. Sensitivity of contact-tracing for COVID-19 in Thailand: a capture-recapture application |
title | Sensitivity of contact-tracing for COVID-19 in Thailand: a capture-recapture application |
title_full | Sensitivity of contact-tracing for COVID-19 in Thailand: a capture-recapture application |
title_fullStr | Sensitivity of contact-tracing for COVID-19 in Thailand: a capture-recapture application |
title_full_unstemmed | Sensitivity of contact-tracing for COVID-19 in Thailand: a capture-recapture application |
title_short | Sensitivity of contact-tracing for COVID-19 in Thailand: a capture-recapture application |
title_sort | sensitivity of contact-tracing for covid-19 in thailand: a capture-recapture application |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8799986/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35093019 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-022-07046-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lerdsuwansrir sensitivityofcontacttracingforcovid19inthailandacapturerecaptureapplication AT sangnawakijp sensitivityofcontacttracingforcovid19inthailandacapturerecaptureapplication AT bohningd sensitivityofcontacttracingforcovid19inthailandacapturerecaptureapplication AT sansilapinc sensitivityofcontacttracingforcovid19inthailandacapturerecaptureapplication AT chaifoow sensitivityofcontacttracingforcovid19inthailandacapturerecaptureapplication AT polonskyjonathana sensitivityofcontacttracingforcovid19inthailandacapturerecaptureapplication AT delriovilasvictorj sensitivityofcontacttracingforcovid19inthailandacapturerecaptureapplication |