Cargando…
The life and death of confidentiality: a historical analysis of the flows of patient information
Health data can contain sensitive information. People who consult a doctor seek help on issues that matter to them: they typically expect some form of confidentiality. However, the notion and practices of confidentiality have changed dramatically over time. In this article, we trace the history of c...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Palgrave Macmillan UK
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8799987/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35126615 http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/s41292-021-00269-x |
_version_ | 1784642167247994880 |
---|---|
author | Wadmann, Sarah Hartlev, Mette Hoeyer, Klaus |
author_facet | Wadmann, Sarah Hartlev, Mette Hoeyer, Klaus |
author_sort | Wadmann, Sarah |
collection | PubMed |
description | Health data can contain sensitive information. People who consult a doctor seek help on issues that matter to them: they typically expect some form of confidentiality. However, the notion and practices of confidentiality have changed dramatically over time. In this article, we trace the history of confidentiality in the Danish healthcare system, which has one of the world’s most integrated patient information infrastructures. Building on an analysis of legal and political documents dating back to the late seventeenth century, we show that confidentiality originated as a social phenomenon that helped build trust in healthcare professionals and gradually developed into an idiom of citizens rights. Lately, confidentiality has given way to more technocratic forms of data protection. As the political, legal and technological reality, which the idea of confidentiality once referred to, has radically changed, we argue that confidentiality has become what Ulrik Beck has called a ‘zombie category’—a notion that lives on even if its content has passed away. If confidentiality has become a zombie concept, we suggest it is time to discuss what may take its place so that patient interests are protected in the current political economy of health data. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8799987 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Palgrave Macmillan UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87999872022-01-31 The life and death of confidentiality: a historical analysis of the flows of patient information Wadmann, Sarah Hartlev, Mette Hoeyer, Klaus Biosocieties Original Article Health data can contain sensitive information. People who consult a doctor seek help on issues that matter to them: they typically expect some form of confidentiality. However, the notion and practices of confidentiality have changed dramatically over time. In this article, we trace the history of confidentiality in the Danish healthcare system, which has one of the world’s most integrated patient information infrastructures. Building on an analysis of legal and political documents dating back to the late seventeenth century, we show that confidentiality originated as a social phenomenon that helped build trust in healthcare professionals and gradually developed into an idiom of citizens rights. Lately, confidentiality has given way to more technocratic forms of data protection. As the political, legal and technological reality, which the idea of confidentiality once referred to, has radically changed, we argue that confidentiality has become what Ulrik Beck has called a ‘zombie category’—a notion that lives on even if its content has passed away. If confidentiality has become a zombie concept, we suggest it is time to discuss what may take its place so that patient interests are protected in the current political economy of health data. Palgrave Macmillan UK 2022-01-29 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC8799987/ /pubmed/35126615 http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/s41292-021-00269-x Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Wadmann, Sarah Hartlev, Mette Hoeyer, Klaus The life and death of confidentiality: a historical analysis of the flows of patient information |
title | The life and death of confidentiality: a historical analysis of the flows of patient information |
title_full | The life and death of confidentiality: a historical analysis of the flows of patient information |
title_fullStr | The life and death of confidentiality: a historical analysis of the flows of patient information |
title_full_unstemmed | The life and death of confidentiality: a historical analysis of the flows of patient information |
title_short | The life and death of confidentiality: a historical analysis of the flows of patient information |
title_sort | life and death of confidentiality: a historical analysis of the flows of patient information |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8799987/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35126615 http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/s41292-021-00269-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wadmannsarah thelifeanddeathofconfidentialityahistoricalanalysisoftheflowsofpatientinformation AT hartlevmette thelifeanddeathofconfidentialityahistoricalanalysisoftheflowsofpatientinformation AT hoeyerklaus thelifeanddeathofconfidentialityahistoricalanalysisoftheflowsofpatientinformation AT wadmannsarah lifeanddeathofconfidentialityahistoricalanalysisoftheflowsofpatientinformation AT hartlevmette lifeanddeathofconfidentialityahistoricalanalysisoftheflowsofpatientinformation AT hoeyerklaus lifeanddeathofconfidentialityahistoricalanalysisoftheflowsofpatientinformation |