Cargando…
Trust and cancer screening: Effects of a screening controversy on women’s perceptions of cervical cancer screening
There is a paucity of data on trust of service users in cervical screening. A significant controversy in Ireland’s national cervical cancer screening programme emerged in 2018. The Health Service Executive (HSE) confirmed that a clinical audit had revealed that more than 200 women who developed canc...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8800010/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35127361 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pmedr.2021.101684 |
_version_ | 1784642172264382464 |
---|---|
author | O'Donovan, B. Mooney, Therese Rimmer, Ben Fitzpatrick, Patricia Flannelly, Grainne Doherty, Lorraine Russell, Noirin Martin, Cara M. O'Leary, John J. Sharp, Linda O'Connor, Mairead |
author_facet | O'Donovan, B. Mooney, Therese Rimmer, Ben Fitzpatrick, Patricia Flannelly, Grainne Doherty, Lorraine Russell, Noirin Martin, Cara M. O'Leary, John J. Sharp, Linda O'Connor, Mairead |
author_sort | O'Donovan, B. |
collection | PubMed |
description | There is a paucity of data on trust of service users in cervical screening. A significant controversy in Ireland’s national cervical cancer screening programme emerged in 2018. The Health Service Executive (HSE) confirmed that a clinical audit had revealed that more than 200 women who developed cancer had not been told of earlier misdiagnosed smear tests. During this high profile controversy we conducted qualitative interviews exploring factors that influence cervical screening participation. Women who had been invited for routine screening tests were recruited from the national screening register. Telephone interviews were conducted with 48 women aged 25–65 years; with a range of screening histories – 34 were adequately screened (attended all routine screening tests) and 14 were inadequately screened (attended some/no screening tests). Thematic analysis was conducted and all interviewees spontaneously raised the screening controversy revealing that the crisis had resulted in serious loss of trust, faith and confidence in the screening programme. Publicity surrounding the controversy had some beneficial effects, including increased awareness of the value of screening and beliefs that intense focus on the programme will improve the service long-term. Strategies which incorporate these findings could help rebuild trust in screening. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8800010 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88000102022-02-03 Trust and cancer screening: Effects of a screening controversy on women’s perceptions of cervical cancer screening O'Donovan, B. Mooney, Therese Rimmer, Ben Fitzpatrick, Patricia Flannelly, Grainne Doherty, Lorraine Russell, Noirin Martin, Cara M. O'Leary, John J. Sharp, Linda O'Connor, Mairead Prev Med Rep Short Communication There is a paucity of data on trust of service users in cervical screening. A significant controversy in Ireland’s national cervical cancer screening programme emerged in 2018. The Health Service Executive (HSE) confirmed that a clinical audit had revealed that more than 200 women who developed cancer had not been told of earlier misdiagnosed smear tests. During this high profile controversy we conducted qualitative interviews exploring factors that influence cervical screening participation. Women who had been invited for routine screening tests were recruited from the national screening register. Telephone interviews were conducted with 48 women aged 25–65 years; with a range of screening histories – 34 were adequately screened (attended all routine screening tests) and 14 were inadequately screened (attended some/no screening tests). Thematic analysis was conducted and all interviewees spontaneously raised the screening controversy revealing that the crisis had resulted in serious loss of trust, faith and confidence in the screening programme. Publicity surrounding the controversy had some beneficial effects, including increased awareness of the value of screening and beliefs that intense focus on the programme will improve the service long-term. Strategies which incorporate these findings could help rebuild trust in screening. 2021-12-27 /pmc/articles/PMC8800010/ /pubmed/35127361 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pmedr.2021.101684 Text en © 2021 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Short Communication O'Donovan, B. Mooney, Therese Rimmer, Ben Fitzpatrick, Patricia Flannelly, Grainne Doherty, Lorraine Russell, Noirin Martin, Cara M. O'Leary, John J. Sharp, Linda O'Connor, Mairead Trust and cancer screening: Effects of a screening controversy on women’s perceptions of cervical cancer screening |
title | Trust and cancer screening: Effects of a screening controversy on women’s perceptions of cervical cancer screening |
title_full | Trust and cancer screening: Effects of a screening controversy on women’s perceptions of cervical cancer screening |
title_fullStr | Trust and cancer screening: Effects of a screening controversy on women’s perceptions of cervical cancer screening |
title_full_unstemmed | Trust and cancer screening: Effects of a screening controversy on women’s perceptions of cervical cancer screening |
title_short | Trust and cancer screening: Effects of a screening controversy on women’s perceptions of cervical cancer screening |
title_sort | trust and cancer screening: effects of a screening controversy on women’s perceptions of cervical cancer screening |
topic | Short Communication |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8800010/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35127361 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pmedr.2021.101684 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT odonovanb trustandcancerscreeningeffectsofascreeningcontroversyonwomensperceptionsofcervicalcancerscreening AT mooneytherese trustandcancerscreeningeffectsofascreeningcontroversyonwomensperceptionsofcervicalcancerscreening AT rimmerben trustandcancerscreeningeffectsofascreeningcontroversyonwomensperceptionsofcervicalcancerscreening AT fitzpatrickpatricia trustandcancerscreeningeffectsofascreeningcontroversyonwomensperceptionsofcervicalcancerscreening AT flannellygrainne trustandcancerscreeningeffectsofascreeningcontroversyonwomensperceptionsofcervicalcancerscreening AT dohertylorraine trustandcancerscreeningeffectsofascreeningcontroversyonwomensperceptionsofcervicalcancerscreening AT russellnoirin trustandcancerscreeningeffectsofascreeningcontroversyonwomensperceptionsofcervicalcancerscreening AT martincaram trustandcancerscreeningeffectsofascreeningcontroversyonwomensperceptionsofcervicalcancerscreening AT olearyjohnj trustandcancerscreeningeffectsofascreeningcontroversyonwomensperceptionsofcervicalcancerscreening AT sharplinda trustandcancerscreeningeffectsofascreeningcontroversyonwomensperceptionsofcervicalcancerscreening AT oconnormairead trustandcancerscreeningeffectsofascreeningcontroversyonwomensperceptionsofcervicalcancerscreening |