Cargando…

Trust and cancer screening: Effects of a screening controversy on women’s perceptions of cervical cancer screening

There is a paucity of data on trust of service users in cervical screening. A significant controversy in Ireland’s national cervical cancer screening programme emerged in 2018. The Health Service Executive (HSE) confirmed that a clinical audit had revealed that more than 200 women who developed canc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: O'Donovan, B., Mooney, Therese, Rimmer, Ben, Fitzpatrick, Patricia, Flannelly, Grainne, Doherty, Lorraine, Russell, Noirin, Martin, Cara M., O'Leary, John J., Sharp, Linda, O'Connor, Mairead
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8800010/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35127361
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pmedr.2021.101684
_version_ 1784642172264382464
author O'Donovan, B.
Mooney, Therese
Rimmer, Ben
Fitzpatrick, Patricia
Flannelly, Grainne
Doherty, Lorraine
Russell, Noirin
Martin, Cara M.
O'Leary, John J.
Sharp, Linda
O'Connor, Mairead
author_facet O'Donovan, B.
Mooney, Therese
Rimmer, Ben
Fitzpatrick, Patricia
Flannelly, Grainne
Doherty, Lorraine
Russell, Noirin
Martin, Cara M.
O'Leary, John J.
Sharp, Linda
O'Connor, Mairead
author_sort O'Donovan, B.
collection PubMed
description There is a paucity of data on trust of service users in cervical screening. A significant controversy in Ireland’s national cervical cancer screening programme emerged in 2018. The Health Service Executive (HSE) confirmed that a clinical audit had revealed that more than 200 women who developed cancer had not been told of earlier misdiagnosed smear tests. During this high profile controversy we conducted qualitative interviews exploring factors that influence cervical screening participation. Women who had been invited for routine screening tests were recruited from the national screening register. Telephone interviews were conducted with 48 women aged 25–65 years; with a range of screening histories – 34 were adequately screened (attended all routine screening tests) and 14 were inadequately screened (attended some/no screening tests). Thematic analysis was conducted and all interviewees spontaneously raised the screening controversy revealing that the crisis had resulted in serious loss of trust, faith and confidence in the screening programme. Publicity surrounding the controversy had some beneficial effects, including increased awareness of the value of screening and beliefs that intense focus on the programme will improve the service long-term. Strategies which incorporate these findings could help rebuild trust in screening.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8800010
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88000102022-02-03 Trust and cancer screening: Effects of a screening controversy on women’s perceptions of cervical cancer screening O'Donovan, B. Mooney, Therese Rimmer, Ben Fitzpatrick, Patricia Flannelly, Grainne Doherty, Lorraine Russell, Noirin Martin, Cara M. O'Leary, John J. Sharp, Linda O'Connor, Mairead Prev Med Rep Short Communication There is a paucity of data on trust of service users in cervical screening. A significant controversy in Ireland’s national cervical cancer screening programme emerged in 2018. The Health Service Executive (HSE) confirmed that a clinical audit had revealed that more than 200 women who developed cancer had not been told of earlier misdiagnosed smear tests. During this high profile controversy we conducted qualitative interviews exploring factors that influence cervical screening participation. Women who had been invited for routine screening tests were recruited from the national screening register. Telephone interviews were conducted with 48 women aged 25–65 years; with a range of screening histories – 34 were adequately screened (attended all routine screening tests) and 14 were inadequately screened (attended some/no screening tests). Thematic analysis was conducted and all interviewees spontaneously raised the screening controversy revealing that the crisis had resulted in serious loss of trust, faith and confidence in the screening programme. Publicity surrounding the controversy had some beneficial effects, including increased awareness of the value of screening and beliefs that intense focus on the programme will improve the service long-term. Strategies which incorporate these findings could help rebuild trust in screening. 2021-12-27 /pmc/articles/PMC8800010/ /pubmed/35127361 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pmedr.2021.101684 Text en © 2021 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Short Communication
O'Donovan, B.
Mooney, Therese
Rimmer, Ben
Fitzpatrick, Patricia
Flannelly, Grainne
Doherty, Lorraine
Russell, Noirin
Martin, Cara M.
O'Leary, John J.
Sharp, Linda
O'Connor, Mairead
Trust and cancer screening: Effects of a screening controversy on women’s perceptions of cervical cancer screening
title Trust and cancer screening: Effects of a screening controversy on women’s perceptions of cervical cancer screening
title_full Trust and cancer screening: Effects of a screening controversy on women’s perceptions of cervical cancer screening
title_fullStr Trust and cancer screening: Effects of a screening controversy on women’s perceptions of cervical cancer screening
title_full_unstemmed Trust and cancer screening: Effects of a screening controversy on women’s perceptions of cervical cancer screening
title_short Trust and cancer screening: Effects of a screening controversy on women’s perceptions of cervical cancer screening
title_sort trust and cancer screening: effects of a screening controversy on women’s perceptions of cervical cancer screening
topic Short Communication
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8800010/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35127361
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pmedr.2021.101684
work_keys_str_mv AT odonovanb trustandcancerscreeningeffectsofascreeningcontroversyonwomensperceptionsofcervicalcancerscreening
AT mooneytherese trustandcancerscreeningeffectsofascreeningcontroversyonwomensperceptionsofcervicalcancerscreening
AT rimmerben trustandcancerscreeningeffectsofascreeningcontroversyonwomensperceptionsofcervicalcancerscreening
AT fitzpatrickpatricia trustandcancerscreeningeffectsofascreeningcontroversyonwomensperceptionsofcervicalcancerscreening
AT flannellygrainne trustandcancerscreeningeffectsofascreeningcontroversyonwomensperceptionsofcervicalcancerscreening
AT dohertylorraine trustandcancerscreeningeffectsofascreeningcontroversyonwomensperceptionsofcervicalcancerscreening
AT russellnoirin trustandcancerscreeningeffectsofascreeningcontroversyonwomensperceptionsofcervicalcancerscreening
AT martincaram trustandcancerscreeningeffectsofascreeningcontroversyonwomensperceptionsofcervicalcancerscreening
AT olearyjohnj trustandcancerscreeningeffectsofascreeningcontroversyonwomensperceptionsofcervicalcancerscreening
AT sharplinda trustandcancerscreeningeffectsofascreeningcontroversyonwomensperceptionsofcervicalcancerscreening
AT oconnormairead trustandcancerscreeningeffectsofascreeningcontroversyonwomensperceptionsofcervicalcancerscreening