Cargando…

Co-payments and equity in care: enhancing hospitalisation policy for Palestine refugees in Lebanon

BACKGROUND: This paper measures the impact of introducing a 10% co-payment on secondary care hospitalization costs for Palestine refugees living in Lebanon (PRL) in all UNRWA contracted hospitals, except for the Red Crescent Society. This ex-post analysis provides a detailed insight on the direction...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Valente de Almeida, Sara, Paolucci, Gloria, Seita, Akihiro, Ghattas, Hala
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8800277/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35090446
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-07427-8
_version_ 1784642225813061632
author Valente de Almeida, Sara
Paolucci, Gloria
Seita, Akihiro
Ghattas, Hala
author_facet Valente de Almeida, Sara
Paolucci, Gloria
Seita, Akihiro
Ghattas, Hala
author_sort Valente de Almeida, Sara
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: This paper measures the impact of introducing a 10% co-payment on secondary care hospitalization costs for Palestine refugees living in Lebanon (PRL) in all UNRWA contracted hospitals, except for the Red Crescent Society. This ex-post analysis provides a detailed insight on the direction and magnitude of the policy impact in terms of demand by hospital type, average length of stay and treatment costs. METHODS: With a complete population episode level dataset, we use multinomial logit, negative binomial, and linear models to estimate impacts on the different dependent variables, controlling for disease, patient and hospital characteristics. RESULTS: After the implementation patients were at least 4 pp (p <0.01) more likely to choose a Red Crescent Society hospital for secondary care, instead of one with co-payment. Average length of stay was not affected in general, despite the increase in control at all UNRWA contracted hospitals. Except for the decrease in UNRWA contribution, did not find a statistically significant impact of the co-payment on costs, nor for the provider or for the patient. Findings suggest that introducing a 10% co-payment for secondary hospital care had an impact on patients’ health care budget, leading to demand shifts towards cheaper options - i.e., patients had to chose care based on financial constraints rather than on their treatment preferences. CONCLUSION: Before changing healthcare payment schemes in different types of hospitals, facilities offering free of charge treatment should be assessed and prepared for potential demand shifts to avoid overcapacity and the collapse of health care services for such a fragile population. In addition, exemptions from co-payments should be considered for patients with severe health conditions and financial constraints, who, according to our results, are the most likely to change their pattern of care due to an increase in treatment costs. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at (10.1186/s12913-021-07427-8).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8800277
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88002772022-02-02 Co-payments and equity in care: enhancing hospitalisation policy for Palestine refugees in Lebanon Valente de Almeida, Sara Paolucci, Gloria Seita, Akihiro Ghattas, Hala BMC Health Serv Res Research BACKGROUND: This paper measures the impact of introducing a 10% co-payment on secondary care hospitalization costs for Palestine refugees living in Lebanon (PRL) in all UNRWA contracted hospitals, except for the Red Crescent Society. This ex-post analysis provides a detailed insight on the direction and magnitude of the policy impact in terms of demand by hospital type, average length of stay and treatment costs. METHODS: With a complete population episode level dataset, we use multinomial logit, negative binomial, and linear models to estimate impacts on the different dependent variables, controlling for disease, patient and hospital characteristics. RESULTS: After the implementation patients were at least 4 pp (p <0.01) more likely to choose a Red Crescent Society hospital for secondary care, instead of one with co-payment. Average length of stay was not affected in general, despite the increase in control at all UNRWA contracted hospitals. Except for the decrease in UNRWA contribution, did not find a statistically significant impact of the co-payment on costs, nor for the provider or for the patient. Findings suggest that introducing a 10% co-payment for secondary hospital care had an impact on patients’ health care budget, leading to demand shifts towards cheaper options - i.e., patients had to chose care based on financial constraints rather than on their treatment preferences. CONCLUSION: Before changing healthcare payment schemes in different types of hospitals, facilities offering free of charge treatment should be assessed and prepared for potential demand shifts to avoid overcapacity and the collapse of health care services for such a fragile population. In addition, exemptions from co-payments should be considered for patients with severe health conditions and financial constraints, who, according to our results, are the most likely to change their pattern of care due to an increase in treatment costs. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at (10.1186/s12913-021-07427-8). BioMed Central 2022-01-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8800277/ /pubmed/35090446 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-07427-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Valente de Almeida, Sara
Paolucci, Gloria
Seita, Akihiro
Ghattas, Hala
Co-payments and equity in care: enhancing hospitalisation policy for Palestine refugees in Lebanon
title Co-payments and equity in care: enhancing hospitalisation policy for Palestine refugees in Lebanon
title_full Co-payments and equity in care: enhancing hospitalisation policy for Palestine refugees in Lebanon
title_fullStr Co-payments and equity in care: enhancing hospitalisation policy for Palestine refugees in Lebanon
title_full_unstemmed Co-payments and equity in care: enhancing hospitalisation policy for Palestine refugees in Lebanon
title_short Co-payments and equity in care: enhancing hospitalisation policy for Palestine refugees in Lebanon
title_sort co-payments and equity in care: enhancing hospitalisation policy for palestine refugees in lebanon
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8800277/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35090446
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-07427-8
work_keys_str_mv AT valentedealmeidasara copaymentsandequityincareenhancinghospitalisationpolicyforpalestinerefugeesinlebanon
AT paoluccigloria copaymentsandequityincareenhancinghospitalisationpolicyforpalestinerefugeesinlebanon
AT seitaakihiro copaymentsandequityincareenhancinghospitalisationpolicyforpalestinerefugeesinlebanon
AT ghattashala copaymentsandequityincareenhancinghospitalisationpolicyforpalestinerefugeesinlebanon