Cargando…

The miscarriage circle of care: towards leveraging online spaces for social support

BACKGROUND: Lack of social support during and after miscarriage can greatly affect mental wellbeing. With miscarriages being a common experience, there remains a discrepancy in the social support received after a pregnancy is lost. METHOD: 42 people who had experienced at least one miscarriage took...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Alqassim, Mona Y., Kresnye, K. Cassie, Siek, Katie A., Lee, John, Wolters, Maria K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8800293/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35090452
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12905-022-01597-1
_version_ 1784642229228273664
author Alqassim, Mona Y.
Kresnye, K. Cassie
Siek, Katie A.
Lee, John
Wolters, Maria K.
author_facet Alqassim, Mona Y.
Kresnye, K. Cassie
Siek, Katie A.
Lee, John
Wolters, Maria K.
author_sort Alqassim, Mona Y.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Lack of social support during and after miscarriage can greatly affect mental wellbeing. With miscarriages being a common experience, there remains a discrepancy in the social support received after a pregnancy is lost. METHOD: 42 people who had experienced at least one miscarriage took part in an Asynchronous Remote Community (ARC) study. The study involved 16 activities (discussions, creative tasks, and surveys) in two closed, secret Facebook groups over eight weeks. Descriptive statistics were used to analyse quantitative data, and content analysis was used for qualitative data. RESULTS: There were two main miscarriage care networks, formal (health care providers) and informal (friends, family, work colleagues). The formal care network was the most trusted informational support source, while the informal care network was the main source of tangible support. However, often, participants’ care networks were unable to provide sufficient informational, emotional, esteem, and network support. Peers who also had experienced miscarriage played a crucial role in addressing these gaps in social support. Technology use varied greatly, with smartphone use as the only common denominator. While there was a range of online support sources, participants tended to focus on only a few, and there was no single common preferred source. DISCUSSION: We propose a Miscarriage Circle of Care Model (MCCM), with peer advisors playing a central role in improving communication channels and social support provision. We show how the MCCM can be used to identify gaps in service provision and opportunities where technology can be leveraged to fill those gaps.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8800293
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88002932022-02-02 The miscarriage circle of care: towards leveraging online spaces for social support Alqassim, Mona Y. Kresnye, K. Cassie Siek, Katie A. Lee, John Wolters, Maria K. BMC Womens Health Research BACKGROUND: Lack of social support during and after miscarriage can greatly affect mental wellbeing. With miscarriages being a common experience, there remains a discrepancy in the social support received after a pregnancy is lost. METHOD: 42 people who had experienced at least one miscarriage took part in an Asynchronous Remote Community (ARC) study. The study involved 16 activities (discussions, creative tasks, and surveys) in two closed, secret Facebook groups over eight weeks. Descriptive statistics were used to analyse quantitative data, and content analysis was used for qualitative data. RESULTS: There were two main miscarriage care networks, formal (health care providers) and informal (friends, family, work colleagues). The formal care network was the most trusted informational support source, while the informal care network was the main source of tangible support. However, often, participants’ care networks were unable to provide sufficient informational, emotional, esteem, and network support. Peers who also had experienced miscarriage played a crucial role in addressing these gaps in social support. Technology use varied greatly, with smartphone use as the only common denominator. While there was a range of online support sources, participants tended to focus on only a few, and there was no single common preferred source. DISCUSSION: We propose a Miscarriage Circle of Care Model (MCCM), with peer advisors playing a central role in improving communication channels and social support provision. We show how the MCCM can be used to identify gaps in service provision and opportunities where technology can be leveraged to fill those gaps. BioMed Central 2022-01-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8800293/ /pubmed/35090452 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12905-022-01597-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Alqassim, Mona Y.
Kresnye, K. Cassie
Siek, Katie A.
Lee, John
Wolters, Maria K.
The miscarriage circle of care: towards leveraging online spaces for social support
title The miscarriage circle of care: towards leveraging online spaces for social support
title_full The miscarriage circle of care: towards leveraging online spaces for social support
title_fullStr The miscarriage circle of care: towards leveraging online spaces for social support
title_full_unstemmed The miscarriage circle of care: towards leveraging online spaces for social support
title_short The miscarriage circle of care: towards leveraging online spaces for social support
title_sort miscarriage circle of care: towards leveraging online spaces for social support
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8800293/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35090452
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12905-022-01597-1
work_keys_str_mv AT alqassimmonay themiscarriagecircleofcaretowardsleveragingonlinespacesforsocialsupport
AT kresnyekcassie themiscarriagecircleofcaretowardsleveragingonlinespacesforsocialsupport
AT siekkatiea themiscarriagecircleofcaretowardsleveragingonlinespacesforsocialsupport
AT leejohn themiscarriagecircleofcaretowardsleveragingonlinespacesforsocialsupport
AT woltersmariak themiscarriagecircleofcaretowardsleveragingonlinespacesforsocialsupport
AT alqassimmonay miscarriagecircleofcaretowardsleveragingonlinespacesforsocialsupport
AT kresnyekcassie miscarriagecircleofcaretowardsleveragingonlinespacesforsocialsupport
AT siekkatiea miscarriagecircleofcaretowardsleveragingonlinespacesforsocialsupport
AT leejohn miscarriagecircleofcaretowardsleveragingonlinespacesforsocialsupport
AT woltersmariak miscarriagecircleofcaretowardsleveragingonlinespacesforsocialsupport