Cargando…

Prevalence of urinary schistosomiasis in women: a systematic review and meta-analysis of recently published literature (2016–2020)

BACKGROUND: Urinary schistosomiasis is a serious threat in endemic territories of Africa and the Middle East. The status of female urinary schistosomiasis (FUS) in published literature between 2016 and 2020 was investigated. METHODS: A systematic search in PubMed, Scopus, Google Scholar, and Web of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shams, Morteza, Khazaei, Sasan, Ghasemi, Ezatollah, Nazari, Naser, Javanmardi, Erfan, Majidiani, Hamidreza, Bahadory, Saeed, Anvari, Davood, Fatollahzadeh, Mohammad, Nemati, Taher, Asghari, Ali
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8800356/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35093180
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41182-022-00402-x
_version_ 1784642242880733184
author Shams, Morteza
Khazaei, Sasan
Ghasemi, Ezatollah
Nazari, Naser
Javanmardi, Erfan
Majidiani, Hamidreza
Bahadory, Saeed
Anvari, Davood
Fatollahzadeh, Mohammad
Nemati, Taher
Asghari, Ali
author_facet Shams, Morteza
Khazaei, Sasan
Ghasemi, Ezatollah
Nazari, Naser
Javanmardi, Erfan
Majidiani, Hamidreza
Bahadory, Saeed
Anvari, Davood
Fatollahzadeh, Mohammad
Nemati, Taher
Asghari, Ali
author_sort Shams, Morteza
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Urinary schistosomiasis is a serious threat in endemic territories of Africa and the Middle East. The status of female urinary schistosomiasis (FUS) in published literature between 2016 and 2020 was investigated. METHODS: A systematic search in PubMed, Scopus, Google Scholar, and Web of Science, based on the ‘Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses’ checklist, and a meta-analysis using random-effects model to calculate the weighted estimates and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were done. RESULTS: Totally, 113 datasets reported data on 40,531 women from 21 African countries, showing a pooled prevalence of 17.5% (95% CI: 14.8–20.5%). Most studies (73) were performed in Nigeria, while highest prevalence was detected in Mozambique 58% (95% CI: 56.9–59.1%) (one study). By sample type and symptoms, vaginal lavage [25.0% (95% CI: 11.4–46.1%)] and hematuria 19.4% (95% CI: 12.2–29.4%) showed higher FUS frequency. Studies using direct microscopy diagnosed a 17.1% (95% CI: 14.5–20.1%) prevalence rate, higher than PCR-based studies 15.3% (95% CI: 6.1–33.2%). Except for sample type, all other variables had significant association with the overall prevalence of FUS. CONCLUSIONS: More studies are needed to evaluate the true epidemiology of FUS throughout endemic regions. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s41182-022-00402-x.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8800356
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88003562022-02-02 Prevalence of urinary schistosomiasis in women: a systematic review and meta-analysis of recently published literature (2016–2020) Shams, Morteza Khazaei, Sasan Ghasemi, Ezatollah Nazari, Naser Javanmardi, Erfan Majidiani, Hamidreza Bahadory, Saeed Anvari, Davood Fatollahzadeh, Mohammad Nemati, Taher Asghari, Ali Trop Med Health Review BACKGROUND: Urinary schistosomiasis is a serious threat in endemic territories of Africa and the Middle East. The status of female urinary schistosomiasis (FUS) in published literature between 2016 and 2020 was investigated. METHODS: A systematic search in PubMed, Scopus, Google Scholar, and Web of Science, based on the ‘Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses’ checklist, and a meta-analysis using random-effects model to calculate the weighted estimates and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were done. RESULTS: Totally, 113 datasets reported data on 40,531 women from 21 African countries, showing a pooled prevalence of 17.5% (95% CI: 14.8–20.5%). Most studies (73) were performed in Nigeria, while highest prevalence was detected in Mozambique 58% (95% CI: 56.9–59.1%) (one study). By sample type and symptoms, vaginal lavage [25.0% (95% CI: 11.4–46.1%)] and hematuria 19.4% (95% CI: 12.2–29.4%) showed higher FUS frequency. Studies using direct microscopy diagnosed a 17.1% (95% CI: 14.5–20.1%) prevalence rate, higher than PCR-based studies 15.3% (95% CI: 6.1–33.2%). Except for sample type, all other variables had significant association with the overall prevalence of FUS. CONCLUSIONS: More studies are needed to evaluate the true epidemiology of FUS throughout endemic regions. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s41182-022-00402-x. BioMed Central 2022-01-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8800356/ /pubmed/35093180 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41182-022-00402-x Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Review
Shams, Morteza
Khazaei, Sasan
Ghasemi, Ezatollah
Nazari, Naser
Javanmardi, Erfan
Majidiani, Hamidreza
Bahadory, Saeed
Anvari, Davood
Fatollahzadeh, Mohammad
Nemati, Taher
Asghari, Ali
Prevalence of urinary schistosomiasis in women: a systematic review and meta-analysis of recently published literature (2016–2020)
title Prevalence of urinary schistosomiasis in women: a systematic review and meta-analysis of recently published literature (2016–2020)
title_full Prevalence of urinary schistosomiasis in women: a systematic review and meta-analysis of recently published literature (2016–2020)
title_fullStr Prevalence of urinary schistosomiasis in women: a systematic review and meta-analysis of recently published literature (2016–2020)
title_full_unstemmed Prevalence of urinary schistosomiasis in women: a systematic review and meta-analysis of recently published literature (2016–2020)
title_short Prevalence of urinary schistosomiasis in women: a systematic review and meta-analysis of recently published literature (2016–2020)
title_sort prevalence of urinary schistosomiasis in women: a systematic review and meta-analysis of recently published literature (2016–2020)
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8800356/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35093180
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41182-022-00402-x
work_keys_str_mv AT shamsmorteza prevalenceofurinaryschistosomiasisinwomenasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrecentlypublishedliterature20162020
AT khazaeisasan prevalenceofurinaryschistosomiasisinwomenasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrecentlypublishedliterature20162020
AT ghasemiezatollah prevalenceofurinaryschistosomiasisinwomenasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrecentlypublishedliterature20162020
AT nazarinaser prevalenceofurinaryschistosomiasisinwomenasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrecentlypublishedliterature20162020
AT javanmardierfan prevalenceofurinaryschistosomiasisinwomenasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrecentlypublishedliterature20162020
AT majidianihamidreza prevalenceofurinaryschistosomiasisinwomenasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrecentlypublishedliterature20162020
AT bahadorysaeed prevalenceofurinaryschistosomiasisinwomenasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrecentlypublishedliterature20162020
AT anvaridavood prevalenceofurinaryschistosomiasisinwomenasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrecentlypublishedliterature20162020
AT fatollahzadehmohammad prevalenceofurinaryschistosomiasisinwomenasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrecentlypublishedliterature20162020
AT nematitaher prevalenceofurinaryschistosomiasisinwomenasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrecentlypublishedliterature20162020
AT asghariali prevalenceofurinaryschistosomiasisinwomenasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrecentlypublishedliterature20162020