Cargando…

Risk and asset-based strategies in health: priorities in biomedical, life and environmental science literature since the early twentieth century. A rapid review

BACKGROUND: In biomedical, life or environmental science research, two different strategies exist depending on the starting point of the researchers: “what makes us ill? “ or “what makes us healthy?”. Indeed, a risk-based strategy (RBS) attempts to minimize risk factors increasing the likelihood of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Migeot, Virginie, Guihenneuc, Jérémy, Ouazzani, Houria El, Albouy, Marion, Dupuis, Antoine, Rabouan, Sylvie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8800416/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35093075
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12940-022-00833-3
_version_ 1784642255574794240
author Migeot, Virginie
Guihenneuc, Jérémy
Ouazzani, Houria El
Albouy, Marion
Dupuis, Antoine
Rabouan, Sylvie
author_facet Migeot, Virginie
Guihenneuc, Jérémy
Ouazzani, Houria El
Albouy, Marion
Dupuis, Antoine
Rabouan, Sylvie
author_sort Migeot, Virginie
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In biomedical, life or environmental science research, two different strategies exist depending on the starting point of the researchers: “what makes us ill? “ or “what makes us healthy?”. Indeed, a risk-based strategy (RBS) attempts to minimize risk factors increasing the likelihood of developing a disease, while an asset-based strategy (ABS) attempts to promote and strengthen the factors that support good health and wellbeing. We provided an up-to-date overview of both research strategies in peer-reviewed scientific literature, in the fields of human health, animal and plant health and ecosystem health, to fit with the One Health framework. More particularly, we focused on human health by studying publications related to the COVID-19 at the beginning of the pandemic. DESIGN: A rapid review of research science literature was carried out to identify in the PubMed/MEDLINE database the proportion of peer-reviewed articles adopting either a RBS or an ABS, in the main global environment fields from January 01, 1900 to December 31, 2019 and, related to COVID-19, from December 1, 2019 to May 31, 2020. RESULTS: The number of published articles resulting from our search was 1,957,905, including 91.3% with an RBS and 8.7% with an ABS. When examining each field, we found that only 10.5% of human health articles deal with ABS, 5.5% for animal health, 2.2% for ecosystem health, 1.0% for plant health and 2.7% for environmental media. We noted that articles adopting both strategies were published in all health fields. Among the articles concerning COVID-19, 5,854 (55.9%), 542 articles (5.2%) adopted RBS and ABS, respectively, while 4069 (38.9%) simultaneously presenting both strategies. CONCLUSION: Our results have allowed us to take stock of the biomedical research strategies prioritized during the twentieth century. It seems highly likely that the two strategies we have analyzed can now be chosen in such a way as to promote a balance in public health measures, at every level to guide One Health interventions aimed at helping people, animals, and plants to lead healthier lives.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8800416
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88004162022-01-31 Risk and asset-based strategies in health: priorities in biomedical, life and environmental science literature since the early twentieth century. A rapid review Migeot, Virginie Guihenneuc, Jérémy Ouazzani, Houria El Albouy, Marion Dupuis, Antoine Rabouan, Sylvie Environ Health Review BACKGROUND: In biomedical, life or environmental science research, two different strategies exist depending on the starting point of the researchers: “what makes us ill? “ or “what makes us healthy?”. Indeed, a risk-based strategy (RBS) attempts to minimize risk factors increasing the likelihood of developing a disease, while an asset-based strategy (ABS) attempts to promote and strengthen the factors that support good health and wellbeing. We provided an up-to-date overview of both research strategies in peer-reviewed scientific literature, in the fields of human health, animal and plant health and ecosystem health, to fit with the One Health framework. More particularly, we focused on human health by studying publications related to the COVID-19 at the beginning of the pandemic. DESIGN: A rapid review of research science literature was carried out to identify in the PubMed/MEDLINE database the proportion of peer-reviewed articles adopting either a RBS or an ABS, in the main global environment fields from January 01, 1900 to December 31, 2019 and, related to COVID-19, from December 1, 2019 to May 31, 2020. RESULTS: The number of published articles resulting from our search was 1,957,905, including 91.3% with an RBS and 8.7% with an ABS. When examining each field, we found that only 10.5% of human health articles deal with ABS, 5.5% for animal health, 2.2% for ecosystem health, 1.0% for plant health and 2.7% for environmental media. We noted that articles adopting both strategies were published in all health fields. Among the articles concerning COVID-19, 5,854 (55.9%), 542 articles (5.2%) adopted RBS and ABS, respectively, while 4069 (38.9%) simultaneously presenting both strategies. CONCLUSION: Our results have allowed us to take stock of the biomedical research strategies prioritized during the twentieth century. It seems highly likely that the two strategies we have analyzed can now be chosen in such a way as to promote a balance in public health measures, at every level to guide One Health interventions aimed at helping people, animals, and plants to lead healthier lives. BioMed Central 2022-01-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8800416/ /pubmed/35093075 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12940-022-00833-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Review
Migeot, Virginie
Guihenneuc, Jérémy
Ouazzani, Houria El
Albouy, Marion
Dupuis, Antoine
Rabouan, Sylvie
Risk and asset-based strategies in health: priorities in biomedical, life and environmental science literature since the early twentieth century. A rapid review
title Risk and asset-based strategies in health: priorities in biomedical, life and environmental science literature since the early twentieth century. A rapid review
title_full Risk and asset-based strategies in health: priorities in biomedical, life and environmental science literature since the early twentieth century. A rapid review
title_fullStr Risk and asset-based strategies in health: priorities in biomedical, life and environmental science literature since the early twentieth century. A rapid review
title_full_unstemmed Risk and asset-based strategies in health: priorities in biomedical, life and environmental science literature since the early twentieth century. A rapid review
title_short Risk and asset-based strategies in health: priorities in biomedical, life and environmental science literature since the early twentieth century. A rapid review
title_sort risk and asset-based strategies in health: priorities in biomedical, life and environmental science literature since the early twentieth century. a rapid review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8800416/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35093075
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12940-022-00833-3
work_keys_str_mv AT migeotvirginie riskandassetbasedstrategiesinhealthprioritiesinbiomedicallifeandenvironmentalscienceliteraturesincetheearlytwentiethcenturyarapidreview
AT guihenneucjeremy riskandassetbasedstrategiesinhealthprioritiesinbiomedicallifeandenvironmentalscienceliteraturesincetheearlytwentiethcenturyarapidreview
AT ouazzanihouriael riskandassetbasedstrategiesinhealthprioritiesinbiomedicallifeandenvironmentalscienceliteraturesincetheearlytwentiethcenturyarapidreview
AT albouymarion riskandassetbasedstrategiesinhealthprioritiesinbiomedicallifeandenvironmentalscienceliteraturesincetheearlytwentiethcenturyarapidreview
AT dupuisantoine riskandassetbasedstrategiesinhealthprioritiesinbiomedicallifeandenvironmentalscienceliteraturesincetheearlytwentiethcenturyarapidreview
AT rabouansylvie riskandassetbasedstrategiesinhealthprioritiesinbiomedicallifeandenvironmentalscienceliteraturesincetheearlytwentiethcenturyarapidreview