Cargando…

Deep learning analysis of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography to determine histoprognostic factors of malignant breast tumours

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate if a deep learning model can be used to characterise breast cancers on contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM). METHODS: This retrospective mono-centric study included biopsy-proven invasive cancers with an enhancement on CESM. CESM images include low-energy images (LE)...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dominique, Caroline, Callonnec, Françoise, Berghian, Anca, Defta, Diana, Vera, Pierre, Modzelewski, Romain, Decazes, Pierre
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8800426/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35094119
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-022-08538-4
_version_ 1784642257593303040
author Dominique, Caroline
Callonnec, Françoise
Berghian, Anca
Defta, Diana
Vera, Pierre
Modzelewski, Romain
Decazes, Pierre
author_facet Dominique, Caroline
Callonnec, Françoise
Berghian, Anca
Defta, Diana
Vera, Pierre
Modzelewski, Romain
Decazes, Pierre
author_sort Dominique, Caroline
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To evaluate if a deep learning model can be used to characterise breast cancers on contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM). METHODS: This retrospective mono-centric study included biopsy-proven invasive cancers with an enhancement on CESM. CESM images include low-energy images (LE) comparable to digital mammography and dual-energy subtracted images (DES) showing tumour angiogenesis. For each lesion, histologic type, tumour grade, estrogen receptor (ER) status, progesterone receptor (PR) status, HER-2 status, Ki-67 proliferation index, and the size of the invasive tumour were retrieved. The deep learning model used was a CheXNet-based model fine-tuned on CESM dataset. The area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was calculated for the different models: images by images and then by majority voting combining all the incidences for one tumour. RESULTS: In total, 447 invasive breast cancers detected on CESM with pathological evidence, in 389 patients, which represented 2460 images analysed, were included. Concerning the ER, the deep learning model on the DES images had an AUC of 0.83 with the image-by-image analysis and of 0.85 for the majority voting. For the triple-negative analysis, a high AUC was observable for all models, in particularity for the model on LE images with an AUC of 0.90 for the image-by-image analysis and 0.91 for the majority voting. The AUC for the other histoprognostic factors was lower. CONCLUSION: Deep learning analysis on CESM has the potential to determine histoprognostic tumours makers, notably estrogen receptor status, and triple-negative receptor status. KEY POINTS: • A deep learning model developed for chest radiography was adapted by fine-tuning to be used on contrast-enhanced spectral mammography. • The adapted models allowed to determine for invasive breast cancers the status of estrogen receptors and triple-negative receptors. • Such models applied to contrast-enhanced spectral mammography could provide rapid prognostic and predictive information. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00330-022-08538-4.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8800426
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88004262022-01-31 Deep learning analysis of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography to determine histoprognostic factors of malignant breast tumours Dominique, Caroline Callonnec, Françoise Berghian, Anca Defta, Diana Vera, Pierre Modzelewski, Romain Decazes, Pierre Eur Radiol Breast OBJECTIVE: To evaluate if a deep learning model can be used to characterise breast cancers on contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM). METHODS: This retrospective mono-centric study included biopsy-proven invasive cancers with an enhancement on CESM. CESM images include low-energy images (LE) comparable to digital mammography and dual-energy subtracted images (DES) showing tumour angiogenesis. For each lesion, histologic type, tumour grade, estrogen receptor (ER) status, progesterone receptor (PR) status, HER-2 status, Ki-67 proliferation index, and the size of the invasive tumour were retrieved. The deep learning model used was a CheXNet-based model fine-tuned on CESM dataset. The area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was calculated for the different models: images by images and then by majority voting combining all the incidences for one tumour. RESULTS: In total, 447 invasive breast cancers detected on CESM with pathological evidence, in 389 patients, which represented 2460 images analysed, were included. Concerning the ER, the deep learning model on the DES images had an AUC of 0.83 with the image-by-image analysis and of 0.85 for the majority voting. For the triple-negative analysis, a high AUC was observable for all models, in particularity for the model on LE images with an AUC of 0.90 for the image-by-image analysis and 0.91 for the majority voting. The AUC for the other histoprognostic factors was lower. CONCLUSION: Deep learning analysis on CESM has the potential to determine histoprognostic tumours makers, notably estrogen receptor status, and triple-negative receptor status. KEY POINTS: • A deep learning model developed for chest radiography was adapted by fine-tuning to be used on contrast-enhanced spectral mammography. • The adapted models allowed to determine for invasive breast cancers the status of estrogen receptors and triple-negative receptors. • Such models applied to contrast-enhanced spectral mammography could provide rapid prognostic and predictive information. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00330-022-08538-4. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-01-29 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8800426/ /pubmed/35094119 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-022-08538-4 Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to European Society of Radiology 2022 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Breast
Dominique, Caroline
Callonnec, Françoise
Berghian, Anca
Defta, Diana
Vera, Pierre
Modzelewski, Romain
Decazes, Pierre
Deep learning analysis of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography to determine histoprognostic factors of malignant breast tumours
title Deep learning analysis of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography to determine histoprognostic factors of malignant breast tumours
title_full Deep learning analysis of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography to determine histoprognostic factors of malignant breast tumours
title_fullStr Deep learning analysis of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography to determine histoprognostic factors of malignant breast tumours
title_full_unstemmed Deep learning analysis of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography to determine histoprognostic factors of malignant breast tumours
title_short Deep learning analysis of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography to determine histoprognostic factors of malignant breast tumours
title_sort deep learning analysis of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography to determine histoprognostic factors of malignant breast tumours
topic Breast
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8800426/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35094119
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-022-08538-4
work_keys_str_mv AT dominiquecaroline deeplearninganalysisofcontrastenhancedspectralmammographytodeterminehistoprognosticfactorsofmalignantbreasttumours
AT callonnecfrancoise deeplearninganalysisofcontrastenhancedspectralmammographytodeterminehistoprognosticfactorsofmalignantbreasttumours
AT berghiananca deeplearninganalysisofcontrastenhancedspectralmammographytodeterminehistoprognosticfactorsofmalignantbreasttumours
AT deftadiana deeplearninganalysisofcontrastenhancedspectralmammographytodeterminehistoprognosticfactorsofmalignantbreasttumours
AT verapierre deeplearninganalysisofcontrastenhancedspectralmammographytodeterminehistoprognosticfactorsofmalignantbreasttumours
AT modzelewskiromain deeplearninganalysisofcontrastenhancedspectralmammographytodeterminehistoprognosticfactorsofmalignantbreasttumours
AT decazespierre deeplearninganalysisofcontrastenhancedspectralmammographytodeterminehistoprognosticfactorsofmalignantbreasttumours