Cargando…

Operational challenges of engaging development partners in district health planning in Tanzania

BACKGROUND: Development Assistance for Health (DAH) represents an important source of health financing in many low and middle-income countries. However, there are few accounts on how priorities funded through DAH are integrated with district health priorities. This study is aimed at understanding th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kiologwe, James C., Kusirye, Ukio, Hoffman, Axel, Kalolo, Albino
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8800550/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35093065
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-12520-6
_version_ 1784642285324992512
author Kiologwe, James C.
Kusirye, Ukio
Hoffman, Axel
Kalolo, Albino
author_facet Kiologwe, James C.
Kusirye, Ukio
Hoffman, Axel
Kalolo, Albino
author_sort Kiologwe, James C.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Development Assistance for Health (DAH) represents an important source of health financing in many low and middle-income countries. However, there are few accounts on how priorities funded through DAH are integrated with district health priorities. This study is aimed at understanding the operational challenges of engaging development partners in district health planning in Tanzania. METHODS: This explanatory mixed-methods study was conducted in Kinondoni and Bahi districts, representing urban and rural settings of the country. Data collection took place between November and December 2015. The quantitative tools (mapping checklist, district questionnaire and Development partners (DPs) questionnaire) mapped the DPs and their activities and gauged the strength of DP engagement in district health planning. The qualitative tool, a semi-structured in-depth interview guide administered to 20 key informants (the council health planning team members and the development partners) explained the barriers and facilitators of engagement. Descriptive and thematic analysis was utilized for quantitative and qualitative data analysis respectively. RESULTS: Eighty-six per cent (85%) of the development partners delivering aid in the studied districts were Non-Governmental Organizations. Twenty percent (20%) of the interventions were HIV/AIDS interventions. We found that only four (4) representing 25 % (25%) DPs had an MOU with the District Council, 56 % (56%) had submitted their plans in writing to be integrated into the 2014/15 CCHP. Six (6) representing 38 % (38%) respondents had received at least one document (guidelines, policies and other planning tools) from the district for them to use in developing their organization activity plans. Eighty-seven point 5 % (87.5%) from Bahi had partial or substantial participation, in the planning process while sixty-two point 5 % (62.5%) from Kinondoni had not participated at all (zero participation). The operational challenges to engagements included differences in planning cycles between the government and donors, uncertainties in funding from the prime donors, lack of transparency, limited skills of district planning teams, technical practicalities on planning tools and processes, inadequate knowledge on planning guidelines among DPs and, poor donor coordination at the district level. CONCLUSIONS: We found low engagement of Development Partners in planning. To be resolved are operational challenges related to differences in planning cycles, articulations and communication of local priorities, donor coordination, and technical skills on planning and stakeholder engagement. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12889-022-12520-6.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8800550
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88005502022-01-31 Operational challenges of engaging development partners in district health planning in Tanzania Kiologwe, James C. Kusirye, Ukio Hoffman, Axel Kalolo, Albino BMC Public Health Research BACKGROUND: Development Assistance for Health (DAH) represents an important source of health financing in many low and middle-income countries. However, there are few accounts on how priorities funded through DAH are integrated with district health priorities. This study is aimed at understanding the operational challenges of engaging development partners in district health planning in Tanzania. METHODS: This explanatory mixed-methods study was conducted in Kinondoni and Bahi districts, representing urban and rural settings of the country. Data collection took place between November and December 2015. The quantitative tools (mapping checklist, district questionnaire and Development partners (DPs) questionnaire) mapped the DPs and their activities and gauged the strength of DP engagement in district health planning. The qualitative tool, a semi-structured in-depth interview guide administered to 20 key informants (the council health planning team members and the development partners) explained the barriers and facilitators of engagement. Descriptive and thematic analysis was utilized for quantitative and qualitative data analysis respectively. RESULTS: Eighty-six per cent (85%) of the development partners delivering aid in the studied districts were Non-Governmental Organizations. Twenty percent (20%) of the interventions were HIV/AIDS interventions. We found that only four (4) representing 25 % (25%) DPs had an MOU with the District Council, 56 % (56%) had submitted their plans in writing to be integrated into the 2014/15 CCHP. Six (6) representing 38 % (38%) respondents had received at least one document (guidelines, policies and other planning tools) from the district for them to use in developing their organization activity plans. Eighty-seven point 5 % (87.5%) from Bahi had partial or substantial participation, in the planning process while sixty-two point 5 % (62.5%) from Kinondoni had not participated at all (zero participation). The operational challenges to engagements included differences in planning cycles between the government and donors, uncertainties in funding from the prime donors, lack of transparency, limited skills of district planning teams, technical practicalities on planning tools and processes, inadequate knowledge on planning guidelines among DPs and, poor donor coordination at the district level. CONCLUSIONS: We found low engagement of Development Partners in planning. To be resolved are operational challenges related to differences in planning cycles, articulations and communication of local priorities, donor coordination, and technical skills on planning and stakeholder engagement. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12889-022-12520-6. BioMed Central 2022-01-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8800550/ /pubmed/35093065 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-12520-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Kiologwe, James C.
Kusirye, Ukio
Hoffman, Axel
Kalolo, Albino
Operational challenges of engaging development partners in district health planning in Tanzania
title Operational challenges of engaging development partners in district health planning in Tanzania
title_full Operational challenges of engaging development partners in district health planning in Tanzania
title_fullStr Operational challenges of engaging development partners in district health planning in Tanzania
title_full_unstemmed Operational challenges of engaging development partners in district health planning in Tanzania
title_short Operational challenges of engaging development partners in district health planning in Tanzania
title_sort operational challenges of engaging development partners in district health planning in tanzania
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8800550/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35093065
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-12520-6
work_keys_str_mv AT kiologwejamesc operationalchallengesofengagingdevelopmentpartnersindistricthealthplanningintanzania
AT kusiryeukio operationalchallengesofengagingdevelopmentpartnersindistricthealthplanningintanzania
AT hoffmanaxel operationalchallengesofengagingdevelopmentpartnersindistricthealthplanningintanzania
AT kaloloalbino operationalchallengesofengagingdevelopmentpartnersindistricthealthplanningintanzania