Cargando…

Do geopolitical risk and energy consumption contribute to environmental degradation? Evidence from E7 countries

Environmental degradation is frequently cited as one of the eminent issues in the modern era. To limit environmental degradation, prior literature discerns several macroeconomic, socio-economic, and institutional factors that affect environmental degradation. However, the relationship between geopol...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Husnain, Muhammad Iftikhar ul, Syed, Qasim Raza, Bashir, Arooj, Khan, Muhammad Aamir
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8800842/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35094268
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-17606-z
_version_ 1784642314860232704
author Husnain, Muhammad Iftikhar ul
Syed, Qasim Raza
Bashir, Arooj
Khan, Muhammad Aamir
author_facet Husnain, Muhammad Iftikhar ul
Syed, Qasim Raza
Bashir, Arooj
Khan, Muhammad Aamir
author_sort Husnain, Muhammad Iftikhar ul
collection PubMed
description Environmental degradation is frequently cited as one of the eminent issues in the modern era. To limit environmental degradation, prior literature discerns several macroeconomic, socio-economic, and institutional factors that affect environmental degradation. However, the relationship between geopolitical risk and environmental degradation is understudied in the previous literature. To fill this gap, the inquiry at hand aims to scrutinize the influence of geopolitical risk on environmental degradation for E7 countries while controlling the effect of renewable energy, non-renewable energy, and GDP. Further, we utilize both the ecological footprint and CO(2) emissions as proxies of environmental degradation and employ second-generation panel methods for robust findings. In addition to this, the present study uses augmented mean group (AMG) estimator to provide long-run relationship among the selected variables. The findings from the AMG estimator expound that there exists environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) for E7 countries. Moreover, renewable energy ameliorates environmental quality because it plunges both ecological footprint and CO(2) emissions. On the contrary, non-renewable energy consumption escalates both ecological footprint and CO(2) emissions. Finally, geopolitical risk tends to decrease CO(2) emissions as well as ecological footprint. Our findings deduce a few policy implications to replenish environmental quality. For instance, the share of renewables in the energy mix should be surged to ameliorate the environmental quality. Further, to control both the geopolitical risk and environmental degradation at the same time, policymakers should put forward reforms and initiatives (e.g., policies to escalate R&D, technological innovations, and tax exemptions on imports of renewables) that can help to improve environmental quality without affecting geopolitical risk. At times of low geopolitical risk, environmental degradation will surge; therefore, the rate of environmental control taxes should be increased by the policymakers.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8800842
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88008422022-01-31 Do geopolitical risk and energy consumption contribute to environmental degradation? Evidence from E7 countries Husnain, Muhammad Iftikhar ul Syed, Qasim Raza Bashir, Arooj Khan, Muhammad Aamir Environ Sci Pollut Res Int Research Article Environmental degradation is frequently cited as one of the eminent issues in the modern era. To limit environmental degradation, prior literature discerns several macroeconomic, socio-economic, and institutional factors that affect environmental degradation. However, the relationship between geopolitical risk and environmental degradation is understudied in the previous literature. To fill this gap, the inquiry at hand aims to scrutinize the influence of geopolitical risk on environmental degradation for E7 countries while controlling the effect of renewable energy, non-renewable energy, and GDP. Further, we utilize both the ecological footprint and CO(2) emissions as proxies of environmental degradation and employ second-generation panel methods for robust findings. In addition to this, the present study uses augmented mean group (AMG) estimator to provide long-run relationship among the selected variables. The findings from the AMG estimator expound that there exists environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) for E7 countries. Moreover, renewable energy ameliorates environmental quality because it plunges both ecological footprint and CO(2) emissions. On the contrary, non-renewable energy consumption escalates both ecological footprint and CO(2) emissions. Finally, geopolitical risk tends to decrease CO(2) emissions as well as ecological footprint. Our findings deduce a few policy implications to replenish environmental quality. For instance, the share of renewables in the energy mix should be surged to ameliorate the environmental quality. Further, to control both the geopolitical risk and environmental degradation at the same time, policymakers should put forward reforms and initiatives (e.g., policies to escalate R&D, technological innovations, and tax exemptions on imports of renewables) that can help to improve environmental quality without affecting geopolitical risk. At times of low geopolitical risk, environmental degradation will surge; therefore, the rate of environmental control taxes should be increased by the policymakers. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-01-30 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8800842/ /pubmed/35094268 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-17606-z Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2021 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Research Article
Husnain, Muhammad Iftikhar ul
Syed, Qasim Raza
Bashir, Arooj
Khan, Muhammad Aamir
Do geopolitical risk and energy consumption contribute to environmental degradation? Evidence from E7 countries
title Do geopolitical risk and energy consumption contribute to environmental degradation? Evidence from E7 countries
title_full Do geopolitical risk and energy consumption contribute to environmental degradation? Evidence from E7 countries
title_fullStr Do geopolitical risk and energy consumption contribute to environmental degradation? Evidence from E7 countries
title_full_unstemmed Do geopolitical risk and energy consumption contribute to environmental degradation? Evidence from E7 countries
title_short Do geopolitical risk and energy consumption contribute to environmental degradation? Evidence from E7 countries
title_sort do geopolitical risk and energy consumption contribute to environmental degradation? evidence from e7 countries
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8800842/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35094268
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-17606-z
work_keys_str_mv AT husnainmuhammadiftikharul dogeopoliticalriskandenergyconsumptioncontributetoenvironmentaldegradationevidencefrome7countries
AT syedqasimraza dogeopoliticalriskandenergyconsumptioncontributetoenvironmentaldegradationevidencefrome7countries
AT bashirarooj dogeopoliticalriskandenergyconsumptioncontributetoenvironmentaldegradationevidencefrome7countries
AT khanmuhammadaamir dogeopoliticalriskandenergyconsumptioncontributetoenvironmentaldegradationevidencefrome7countries