Cargando…

Are Osteomeatal Complex Variations Related to Nasolacrimal Canal Morphometry?

INTRODUCTION: Due to the close anatomic relationship between paranasal structures and NLC, the morphometric measure of the nasolacrimal canal (NLC) could be affected by the osteomeatal complex (OMC) anatomical variations. The present study aimed to assess the effect of OMC variations on the NLC morp...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Khojastepour, Leila, Dokohaki, Sonia, Paknahad, Maryam
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Mashhad University of Medical Sciences 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8801008/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35145932
http://dx.doi.org/10.22038/IJORL.2021.52612.2784
_version_ 1784642350878818304
author Khojastepour, Leila
Dokohaki, Sonia
Paknahad, Maryam
author_facet Khojastepour, Leila
Dokohaki, Sonia
Paknahad, Maryam
author_sort Khojastepour, Leila
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Due to the close anatomic relationship between paranasal structures and NLC, the morphometric measure of the nasolacrimal canal (NLC) could be affected by the osteomeatal complex (OMC) anatomical variations. The present study aimed to assess the effect of OMC variations on the NLC morphometric features using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This cross-sectional study consisted of CBCT images of 150 subjects in the case group with at least one OMC variation and 40 cases in the control group without any OMC variation within the age range of 18-50 years. The presence of the OMC variations, including agger nasi, nasal septum deviation, concha bullosa, Haller cells, paradoxical middle turbinate, and pneumatization of the uncinate process, was evaluated in each patient. The NLC morphometric measurements were performed and compared between the case and control groups. RESULTS: The middle anteroposterior diameter and middle sectional area of NCL were significantly higher in patients with OMC variations, as compared to that in the control group. The NLC volume was significantly higher in patients with agger nasi, nasal septum deviation, concha bullosa, and pneumatization of the uncinate process, as compared to that in the control group. Nonetheless, no significant difference in NLC angulation with the nasal floor or Frankfurt horizontal plane was observed in the presence of each OMC variation. CONCLUSIONS: As evidenced by the obtained results, a higher volume of the canal was revealed in the presence of some of the OMC variations. Therefore, it can be suggested that OMC variations cannot be a predisposing factor in cases with primary acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8801008
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Mashhad University of Medical Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88010082022-02-09 Are Osteomeatal Complex Variations Related to Nasolacrimal Canal Morphometry? Khojastepour, Leila Dokohaki, Sonia Paknahad, Maryam Iran J Otorhinolaryngol Original Article INTRODUCTION: Due to the close anatomic relationship between paranasal structures and NLC, the morphometric measure of the nasolacrimal canal (NLC) could be affected by the osteomeatal complex (OMC) anatomical variations. The present study aimed to assess the effect of OMC variations on the NLC morphometric features using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This cross-sectional study consisted of CBCT images of 150 subjects in the case group with at least one OMC variation and 40 cases in the control group without any OMC variation within the age range of 18-50 years. The presence of the OMC variations, including agger nasi, nasal septum deviation, concha bullosa, Haller cells, paradoxical middle turbinate, and pneumatization of the uncinate process, was evaluated in each patient. The NLC morphometric measurements were performed and compared between the case and control groups. RESULTS: The middle anteroposterior diameter and middle sectional area of NCL were significantly higher in patients with OMC variations, as compared to that in the control group. The NLC volume was significantly higher in patients with agger nasi, nasal septum deviation, concha bullosa, and pneumatization of the uncinate process, as compared to that in the control group. Nonetheless, no significant difference in NLC angulation with the nasal floor or Frankfurt horizontal plane was observed in the presence of each OMC variation. CONCLUSIONS: As evidenced by the obtained results, a higher volume of the canal was revealed in the presence of some of the OMC variations. Therefore, it can be suggested that OMC variations cannot be a predisposing factor in cases with primary acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction. Mashhad University of Medical Sciences 2022-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8801008/ /pubmed/35145932 http://dx.doi.org/10.22038/IJORL.2021.52612.2784 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) ) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Khojastepour, Leila
Dokohaki, Sonia
Paknahad, Maryam
Are Osteomeatal Complex Variations Related to Nasolacrimal Canal Morphometry?
title Are Osteomeatal Complex Variations Related to Nasolacrimal Canal Morphometry?
title_full Are Osteomeatal Complex Variations Related to Nasolacrimal Canal Morphometry?
title_fullStr Are Osteomeatal Complex Variations Related to Nasolacrimal Canal Morphometry?
title_full_unstemmed Are Osteomeatal Complex Variations Related to Nasolacrimal Canal Morphometry?
title_short Are Osteomeatal Complex Variations Related to Nasolacrimal Canal Morphometry?
title_sort are osteomeatal complex variations related to nasolacrimal canal morphometry?
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8801008/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35145932
http://dx.doi.org/10.22038/IJORL.2021.52612.2784
work_keys_str_mv AT khojastepourleila areosteomeatalcomplexvariationsrelatedtonasolacrimalcanalmorphometry
AT dokohakisonia areosteomeatalcomplexvariationsrelatedtonasolacrimalcanalmorphometry
AT paknahadmaryam areosteomeatalcomplexvariationsrelatedtonasolacrimalcanalmorphometry