Cargando…
Clarifying responsibility: professional digital health in the doctor-patient relationship, recommendations for physicians based on a multi-stakeholder dialogue in the Netherlands
BACKGROUND: Implementation of digital health (eHealth) generally involves adapting pre-established and carefully considered processes or routines, and still raises multiple ethical and legal dilemmas. This study aimed to identify challenges regarding responsibility and liability when prescribing dig...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8801038/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35094713 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-07316-0 |
_version_ | 1784642367909789696 |
---|---|
author | Silven, Anna V. van Peet, Petra G. Boers, Sarah N. Tabak, Monique de Groot, Aviva Hendriks, Djoke van Os, Hendrikus J. A. Bonten, Tobias N. Atsma, Douwe E. de Graaf, Tycho J. Sombroek, Mirjam P. Chavannes, Niels H. Villalobos-Quesada, María |
author_facet | Silven, Anna V. van Peet, Petra G. Boers, Sarah N. Tabak, Monique de Groot, Aviva Hendriks, Djoke van Os, Hendrikus J. A. Bonten, Tobias N. Atsma, Douwe E. de Graaf, Tycho J. Sombroek, Mirjam P. Chavannes, Niels H. Villalobos-Quesada, María |
author_sort | Silven, Anna V. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Implementation of digital health (eHealth) generally involves adapting pre-established and carefully considered processes or routines, and still raises multiple ethical and legal dilemmas. This study aimed to identify challenges regarding responsibility and liability when prescribing digital health in clinical practice. This was part of an overarching project aiming to explore the most pressing ethical and legal obstacles regarding the implementation and adoption of digital health in the Netherlands, and to propose actionable solutions. METHODS: A series of multidisciplinary focus groups with stakeholders who have relevant digital health expertise were analysed through thematic analysis. RESULTS: The emerging general theme was ‘uncertainty regarding responsibilities’ when adopting digital health. Key dilemmas take place in clinical settings and within the doctor-patient relationship (‘professional digital health’). This context is particularly challenging because different stakeholders interact. In the absence of appropriate legal frameworks and codes of conduct tailored to digital health, physicians’ responsibility is to be found in their general duty of care. In other words: to do what is best for patients (not causing harm and doing good). Professional organisations could take a leading role to provide more clarity with respect to physicians’ responsibility, by developing guidance describing physicians’ duty of care in the context of digital health, and to address the resulting responsibilities. CONCLUSIONS: Although legal frameworks governing medical practice describe core ethical principles, rights and obligations of physicians, they do not suffice to clarify their responsibilities in the setting of professional digital health. Here we present a series of recommendations to provide more clarity in this respect, offering the opportunity to improve quality of care and patients’ health. The recommendations can be used as a starting point to develop professional guidance and have the potential to be adapted to other healthcare professionals and systems. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-021-07316-0. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8801038 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88010382022-01-31 Clarifying responsibility: professional digital health in the doctor-patient relationship, recommendations for physicians based on a multi-stakeholder dialogue in the Netherlands Silven, Anna V. van Peet, Petra G. Boers, Sarah N. Tabak, Monique de Groot, Aviva Hendriks, Djoke van Os, Hendrikus J. A. Bonten, Tobias N. Atsma, Douwe E. de Graaf, Tycho J. Sombroek, Mirjam P. Chavannes, Niels H. Villalobos-Quesada, María BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Implementation of digital health (eHealth) generally involves adapting pre-established and carefully considered processes or routines, and still raises multiple ethical and legal dilemmas. This study aimed to identify challenges regarding responsibility and liability when prescribing digital health in clinical practice. This was part of an overarching project aiming to explore the most pressing ethical and legal obstacles regarding the implementation and adoption of digital health in the Netherlands, and to propose actionable solutions. METHODS: A series of multidisciplinary focus groups with stakeholders who have relevant digital health expertise were analysed through thematic analysis. RESULTS: The emerging general theme was ‘uncertainty regarding responsibilities’ when adopting digital health. Key dilemmas take place in clinical settings and within the doctor-patient relationship (‘professional digital health’). This context is particularly challenging because different stakeholders interact. In the absence of appropriate legal frameworks and codes of conduct tailored to digital health, physicians’ responsibility is to be found in their general duty of care. In other words: to do what is best for patients (not causing harm and doing good). Professional organisations could take a leading role to provide more clarity with respect to physicians’ responsibility, by developing guidance describing physicians’ duty of care in the context of digital health, and to address the resulting responsibilities. CONCLUSIONS: Although legal frameworks governing medical practice describe core ethical principles, rights and obligations of physicians, they do not suffice to clarify their responsibilities in the setting of professional digital health. Here we present a series of recommendations to provide more clarity in this respect, offering the opportunity to improve quality of care and patients’ health. The recommendations can be used as a starting point to develop professional guidance and have the potential to be adapted to other healthcare professionals and systems. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-021-07316-0. BioMed Central 2022-01-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8801038/ /pubmed/35094713 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-07316-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Silven, Anna V. van Peet, Petra G. Boers, Sarah N. Tabak, Monique de Groot, Aviva Hendriks, Djoke van Os, Hendrikus J. A. Bonten, Tobias N. Atsma, Douwe E. de Graaf, Tycho J. Sombroek, Mirjam P. Chavannes, Niels H. Villalobos-Quesada, María Clarifying responsibility: professional digital health in the doctor-patient relationship, recommendations for physicians based on a multi-stakeholder dialogue in the Netherlands |
title | Clarifying responsibility: professional digital health in the doctor-patient relationship, recommendations for physicians based on a multi-stakeholder dialogue in the Netherlands |
title_full | Clarifying responsibility: professional digital health in the doctor-patient relationship, recommendations for physicians based on a multi-stakeholder dialogue in the Netherlands |
title_fullStr | Clarifying responsibility: professional digital health in the doctor-patient relationship, recommendations for physicians based on a multi-stakeholder dialogue in the Netherlands |
title_full_unstemmed | Clarifying responsibility: professional digital health in the doctor-patient relationship, recommendations for physicians based on a multi-stakeholder dialogue in the Netherlands |
title_short | Clarifying responsibility: professional digital health in the doctor-patient relationship, recommendations for physicians based on a multi-stakeholder dialogue in the Netherlands |
title_sort | clarifying responsibility: professional digital health in the doctor-patient relationship, recommendations for physicians based on a multi-stakeholder dialogue in the netherlands |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8801038/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35094713 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-07316-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT silvenannav clarifyingresponsibilityprofessionaldigitalhealthinthedoctorpatientrelationshiprecommendationsforphysiciansbasedonamultistakeholderdialogueinthenetherlands AT vanpeetpetrag clarifyingresponsibilityprofessionaldigitalhealthinthedoctorpatientrelationshiprecommendationsforphysiciansbasedonamultistakeholderdialogueinthenetherlands AT boerssarahn clarifyingresponsibilityprofessionaldigitalhealthinthedoctorpatientrelationshiprecommendationsforphysiciansbasedonamultistakeholderdialogueinthenetherlands AT tabakmonique clarifyingresponsibilityprofessionaldigitalhealthinthedoctorpatientrelationshiprecommendationsforphysiciansbasedonamultistakeholderdialogueinthenetherlands AT degrootaviva clarifyingresponsibilityprofessionaldigitalhealthinthedoctorpatientrelationshiprecommendationsforphysiciansbasedonamultistakeholderdialogueinthenetherlands AT hendriksdjoke clarifyingresponsibilityprofessionaldigitalhealthinthedoctorpatientrelationshiprecommendationsforphysiciansbasedonamultistakeholderdialogueinthenetherlands AT vanoshendrikusja clarifyingresponsibilityprofessionaldigitalhealthinthedoctorpatientrelationshiprecommendationsforphysiciansbasedonamultistakeholderdialogueinthenetherlands AT bontentobiasn clarifyingresponsibilityprofessionaldigitalhealthinthedoctorpatientrelationshiprecommendationsforphysiciansbasedonamultistakeholderdialogueinthenetherlands AT atsmadouwee clarifyingresponsibilityprofessionaldigitalhealthinthedoctorpatientrelationshiprecommendationsforphysiciansbasedonamultistakeholderdialogueinthenetherlands AT degraaftychoj clarifyingresponsibilityprofessionaldigitalhealthinthedoctorpatientrelationshiprecommendationsforphysiciansbasedonamultistakeholderdialogueinthenetherlands AT sombroekmirjamp clarifyingresponsibilityprofessionaldigitalhealthinthedoctorpatientrelationshiprecommendationsforphysiciansbasedonamultistakeholderdialogueinthenetherlands AT chavannesnielsh clarifyingresponsibilityprofessionaldigitalhealthinthedoctorpatientrelationshiprecommendationsforphysiciansbasedonamultistakeholderdialogueinthenetherlands AT villalobosquesadamaria clarifyingresponsibilityprofessionaldigitalhealthinthedoctorpatientrelationshiprecommendationsforphysiciansbasedonamultistakeholderdialogueinthenetherlands |