Cargando…

Translation and validation of Chinese version of sense of competence in dementia care staff scale in healthcare providers: a cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND: Healthcare providers’ dementia-care competence is crucial for quality dementia care. A reliable and valid instrument is needed to assess the gaps in their dementia-care competence, and thereby identifying their educational needs. Therefore, this study aims to translate the 17-item Sense...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhao, Yayi, Liu, Li, Ding, Yaping, Shan, Ye, Chan, Helen Y. L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8801082/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35093043
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12912-022-00815-3
_version_ 1784642376632893440
author Zhao, Yayi
Liu, Li
Ding, Yaping
Shan, Ye
Chan, Helen Y. L.
author_facet Zhao, Yayi
Liu, Li
Ding, Yaping
Shan, Ye
Chan, Helen Y. L.
author_sort Zhao, Yayi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Healthcare providers’ dementia-care competence is crucial for quality dementia care. A reliable and valid instrument is needed to assess the gaps in their dementia-care competence, and thereby identifying their educational needs. Therefore, this study aims to translate the 17-item Sense of Competence in Dementia Care Staff (SCIDS) scale into Chinese (SCIDS-C) and to validate the SCIDS-C among Chinese healthcare providers. METHODS: The translation procedure followed the modified Brislin’s translation model. A cross-sectional survey was conducted using the translated version. The validity, including content validity, confirmatory factor analysis, concurrent validity and known-groups validity, was tested. Reliability in terms of internal consistency and test-retest reliability with a 2-week interval was evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 290 healthcare providers in 12 nursing homes and a hospital completed the survey. The scale-level content validity index was .99. The confirmatory factor analysis model marginally supported the original 4-factor structure. Positive but weak correlations were noted between the total score of the SCIDS-C and that of the Dementia Knowledge Assessment Scale (r = .17, p = .005) and Approaches to Dementia Questionnaire (r = .22, p < .001), suggesting acceptable concurrent validity. Differences between health professionals and care assistants were significant in two subscales scores. The internal consistency of the scale was high, with Cronbach’s α of .87. Test-retest reliability was demonstrated with intra-class correlation coefficient of 0.88. CONCLUSIONS: The SCIDS-C demonstrated acceptable reliability and validity although the known-groups validity between health professionals and care assistants was not fully established. It can be used to measure the level of sense of competence and as an outcome measure in educational intervention aiming at improving dementia care among Chinese healthcare providers. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12912-022-00815-3.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8801082
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88010822022-02-02 Translation and validation of Chinese version of sense of competence in dementia care staff scale in healthcare providers: a cross-sectional study Zhao, Yayi Liu, Li Ding, Yaping Shan, Ye Chan, Helen Y. L. BMC Nurs Research BACKGROUND: Healthcare providers’ dementia-care competence is crucial for quality dementia care. A reliable and valid instrument is needed to assess the gaps in their dementia-care competence, and thereby identifying their educational needs. Therefore, this study aims to translate the 17-item Sense of Competence in Dementia Care Staff (SCIDS) scale into Chinese (SCIDS-C) and to validate the SCIDS-C among Chinese healthcare providers. METHODS: The translation procedure followed the modified Brislin’s translation model. A cross-sectional survey was conducted using the translated version. The validity, including content validity, confirmatory factor analysis, concurrent validity and known-groups validity, was tested. Reliability in terms of internal consistency and test-retest reliability with a 2-week interval was evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 290 healthcare providers in 12 nursing homes and a hospital completed the survey. The scale-level content validity index was .99. The confirmatory factor analysis model marginally supported the original 4-factor structure. Positive but weak correlations were noted between the total score of the SCIDS-C and that of the Dementia Knowledge Assessment Scale (r = .17, p = .005) and Approaches to Dementia Questionnaire (r = .22, p < .001), suggesting acceptable concurrent validity. Differences between health professionals and care assistants were significant in two subscales scores. The internal consistency of the scale was high, with Cronbach’s α of .87. Test-retest reliability was demonstrated with intra-class correlation coefficient of 0.88. CONCLUSIONS: The SCIDS-C demonstrated acceptable reliability and validity although the known-groups validity between health professionals and care assistants was not fully established. It can be used to measure the level of sense of competence and as an outcome measure in educational intervention aiming at improving dementia care among Chinese healthcare providers. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12912-022-00815-3. BioMed Central 2022-01-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8801082/ /pubmed/35093043 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12912-022-00815-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Zhao, Yayi
Liu, Li
Ding, Yaping
Shan, Ye
Chan, Helen Y. L.
Translation and validation of Chinese version of sense of competence in dementia care staff scale in healthcare providers: a cross-sectional study
title Translation and validation of Chinese version of sense of competence in dementia care staff scale in healthcare providers: a cross-sectional study
title_full Translation and validation of Chinese version of sense of competence in dementia care staff scale in healthcare providers: a cross-sectional study
title_fullStr Translation and validation of Chinese version of sense of competence in dementia care staff scale in healthcare providers: a cross-sectional study
title_full_unstemmed Translation and validation of Chinese version of sense of competence in dementia care staff scale in healthcare providers: a cross-sectional study
title_short Translation and validation of Chinese version of sense of competence in dementia care staff scale in healthcare providers: a cross-sectional study
title_sort translation and validation of chinese version of sense of competence in dementia care staff scale in healthcare providers: a cross-sectional study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8801082/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35093043
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12912-022-00815-3
work_keys_str_mv AT zhaoyayi translationandvalidationofchineseversionofsenseofcompetenceindementiacarestaffscaleinhealthcareprovidersacrosssectionalstudy
AT liuli translationandvalidationofchineseversionofsenseofcompetenceindementiacarestaffscaleinhealthcareprovidersacrosssectionalstudy
AT dingyaping translationandvalidationofchineseversionofsenseofcompetenceindementiacarestaffscaleinhealthcareprovidersacrosssectionalstudy
AT shanye translationandvalidationofchineseversionofsenseofcompetenceindementiacarestaffscaleinhealthcareprovidersacrosssectionalstudy
AT chanhelenyl translationandvalidationofchineseversionofsenseofcompetenceindementiacarestaffscaleinhealthcareprovidersacrosssectionalstudy