Cargando…

Implementation and experience of an innovative smart patient care system: a cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND: Although a patient care system may help nurses handle patients’ requests or provide timely assistance to those in need, there are a number of barriers faced by nurses in handling alarms. METHODS: The aim of the study was to describe the implementation and experience of an innovative smar...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wen, Ming-Huan, Bai, Dorothy, Lin, Shirling, Chu, Chi-Jen, Hsu, Yeh-Liang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8801128/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35093036
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-07511-7
_version_ 1784642386963464192
author Wen, Ming-Huan
Bai, Dorothy
Lin, Shirling
Chu, Chi-Jen
Hsu, Yeh-Liang
author_facet Wen, Ming-Huan
Bai, Dorothy
Lin, Shirling
Chu, Chi-Jen
Hsu, Yeh-Liang
author_sort Wen, Ming-Huan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Although a patient care system may help nurses handle patients’ requests or provide timely assistance to those in need, there are a number of barriers faced by nurses in handling alarms. METHODS: The aim of the study was to describe the implementation and experience of an innovative smart patient care system (SPCS). This study applied a cross-sectional descriptive design. We recruited 82 nurses from a medical center in Taiwan, with 25 nurses from a ward that had introduced an SPCS and 57 nurses from wards that used the traditional patient care system (TPCS). The major advantages of the SPCS compared to the TPCS include the specification of alarm purposes, the routing of alarms directly to the mobile phone; the capability of immediate communication via phone; and three-stage bed-exit alerts with low false alarm rate. RESULTS: Approximately 56% of nurses in the TPCS wards perceived that the bed-exit alert was easily ignorable, while this rate was reduced to 32% in the SPCS ward. The immediate communication via phone was considered as the most helpful function of the SPCS, with a weighted average score of 3.92/5, and 52% of nurses strongly agreed (5/5) that this function was helpful. The second-highest ranked function was the three-stage bed-exit alert, with an average score of 3.68/5, with approximately 24% of nurses strongly agreeing (5/5) that this function was helpful. The average response time using TPCS was 145.66 s while it was 59.02 s using the SPCS (P < .001). Among the 110 observed alarms in the SPCS ward, none of them were false bed-exit alarms. In comparison, among 120 observed alarms in the TPCS wards, 42 (35%) of them were false bed-exit alarms (P < .001). In this study, we found that 30.91% of alarms using SPCS were processed because nurses received and responded to the alert via mobile phone. CONCLUSIONS: A smart patient care system is needed to help nurses make more informed prioritization decisions between responding to alarms and ongoing tasks and finally assist them in adjusting their work in various situations to improve work efficiency and care quality.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8801128
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88011282022-02-02 Implementation and experience of an innovative smart patient care system: a cross-sectional study Wen, Ming-Huan Bai, Dorothy Lin, Shirling Chu, Chi-Jen Hsu, Yeh-Liang BMC Health Serv Res Research BACKGROUND: Although a patient care system may help nurses handle patients’ requests or provide timely assistance to those in need, there are a number of barriers faced by nurses in handling alarms. METHODS: The aim of the study was to describe the implementation and experience of an innovative smart patient care system (SPCS). This study applied a cross-sectional descriptive design. We recruited 82 nurses from a medical center in Taiwan, with 25 nurses from a ward that had introduced an SPCS and 57 nurses from wards that used the traditional patient care system (TPCS). The major advantages of the SPCS compared to the TPCS include the specification of alarm purposes, the routing of alarms directly to the mobile phone; the capability of immediate communication via phone; and three-stage bed-exit alerts with low false alarm rate. RESULTS: Approximately 56% of nurses in the TPCS wards perceived that the bed-exit alert was easily ignorable, while this rate was reduced to 32% in the SPCS ward. The immediate communication via phone was considered as the most helpful function of the SPCS, with a weighted average score of 3.92/5, and 52% of nurses strongly agreed (5/5) that this function was helpful. The second-highest ranked function was the three-stage bed-exit alert, with an average score of 3.68/5, with approximately 24% of nurses strongly agreeing (5/5) that this function was helpful. The average response time using TPCS was 145.66 s while it was 59.02 s using the SPCS (P < .001). Among the 110 observed alarms in the SPCS ward, none of them were false bed-exit alarms. In comparison, among 120 observed alarms in the TPCS wards, 42 (35%) of them were false bed-exit alarms (P < .001). In this study, we found that 30.91% of alarms using SPCS were processed because nurses received and responded to the alert via mobile phone. CONCLUSIONS: A smart patient care system is needed to help nurses make more informed prioritization decisions between responding to alarms and ongoing tasks and finally assist them in adjusting their work in various situations to improve work efficiency and care quality. BioMed Central 2022-01-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8801128/ /pubmed/35093036 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-07511-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Wen, Ming-Huan
Bai, Dorothy
Lin, Shirling
Chu, Chi-Jen
Hsu, Yeh-Liang
Implementation and experience of an innovative smart patient care system: a cross-sectional study
title Implementation and experience of an innovative smart patient care system: a cross-sectional study
title_full Implementation and experience of an innovative smart patient care system: a cross-sectional study
title_fullStr Implementation and experience of an innovative smart patient care system: a cross-sectional study
title_full_unstemmed Implementation and experience of an innovative smart patient care system: a cross-sectional study
title_short Implementation and experience of an innovative smart patient care system: a cross-sectional study
title_sort implementation and experience of an innovative smart patient care system: a cross-sectional study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8801128/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35093036
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-07511-7
work_keys_str_mv AT wenminghuan implementationandexperienceofaninnovativesmartpatientcaresystemacrosssectionalstudy
AT baidorothy implementationandexperienceofaninnovativesmartpatientcaresystemacrosssectionalstudy
AT linshirling implementationandexperienceofaninnovativesmartpatientcaresystemacrosssectionalstudy
AT chuchijen implementationandexperienceofaninnovativesmartpatientcaresystemacrosssectionalstudy
AT hsuyehliang implementationandexperienceofaninnovativesmartpatientcaresystemacrosssectionalstudy