Cargando…

Soil health and nutrient density: preliminary comparison of regenerative and conventional farming

Several independent comparisons indicate regenerative farming practices enhance the nutritional profiles of crops and livestock. Measurements from paired farms across the United States indicate differences in soil health and crop nutrient density between fields worked with conventional (syntheticall...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Montgomery, David R., Biklé, Anne, Archuleta, Ray, Brown, Paul, Jordan, Jazmin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: PeerJ Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8801175/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35127297
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.12848
_version_ 1784642396599877632
author Montgomery, David R.
Biklé, Anne
Archuleta, Ray
Brown, Paul
Jordan, Jazmin
author_facet Montgomery, David R.
Biklé, Anne
Archuleta, Ray
Brown, Paul
Jordan, Jazmin
author_sort Montgomery, David R.
collection PubMed
description Several independent comparisons indicate regenerative farming practices enhance the nutritional profiles of crops and livestock. Measurements from paired farms across the United States indicate differences in soil health and crop nutrient density between fields worked with conventional (synthetically-fertilized and herbicide-treated) or regenerative practices for 5 to 10 years. Specifically, regenerative farms that combined no-till, cover crops, and diverse rotations—a system known as Conservation Agriculture—produced crops with higher soil organic matter levels, soil health scores, and levels of certain vitamins, minerals, and phytochemicals. In addition, crops from two regenerative no-till vegetable farms, one in California and the other in Connecticut, had higher levels of phytochemicals than values reported previously from New York supermarkets. Moreover, a comparison of wheat from adjacent regenerative and conventional no-till fields in northern Oregon found a higher density of mineral micronutrients in the regenerative crop. Finally, a comparison of the unsaturated fatty acid profile of beef and pork raised on one of the regenerative farms to a regional health-promoting brand and conventional meat from local supermarkets, found higher levels of omega-3 fats and a more health-beneficial ratio of omega-6 to omega-3 fats. Despite small sample sizes, all three crop comparisons show differences in micronutrient and phytochemical concentrations that suggest soil health is an under appreciated influence on nutrient density, particularly for phytochemicals not conventionally considered nutrients but nonetheless relevant to chronic disease prevention. Likewise, regenerative grazing practices produced meat with a better fatty acid profile than conventional and regional health-promoting brands. Together these comparisons offer preliminary support for the conclusion that regenerative soil-building farming practices can enhance the nutritional profile of conventionally grown plant and animal foods.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8801175
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher PeerJ Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88011752022-02-04 Soil health and nutrient density: preliminary comparison of regenerative and conventional farming Montgomery, David R. Biklé, Anne Archuleta, Ray Brown, Paul Jordan, Jazmin PeerJ Agricultural Science Several independent comparisons indicate regenerative farming practices enhance the nutritional profiles of crops and livestock. Measurements from paired farms across the United States indicate differences in soil health and crop nutrient density between fields worked with conventional (synthetically-fertilized and herbicide-treated) or regenerative practices for 5 to 10 years. Specifically, regenerative farms that combined no-till, cover crops, and diverse rotations—a system known as Conservation Agriculture—produced crops with higher soil organic matter levels, soil health scores, and levels of certain vitamins, minerals, and phytochemicals. In addition, crops from two regenerative no-till vegetable farms, one in California and the other in Connecticut, had higher levels of phytochemicals than values reported previously from New York supermarkets. Moreover, a comparison of wheat from adjacent regenerative and conventional no-till fields in northern Oregon found a higher density of mineral micronutrients in the regenerative crop. Finally, a comparison of the unsaturated fatty acid profile of beef and pork raised on one of the regenerative farms to a regional health-promoting brand and conventional meat from local supermarkets, found higher levels of omega-3 fats and a more health-beneficial ratio of omega-6 to omega-3 fats. Despite small sample sizes, all three crop comparisons show differences in micronutrient and phytochemical concentrations that suggest soil health is an under appreciated influence on nutrient density, particularly for phytochemicals not conventionally considered nutrients but nonetheless relevant to chronic disease prevention. Likewise, regenerative grazing practices produced meat with a better fatty acid profile than conventional and regional health-promoting brands. Together these comparisons offer preliminary support for the conclusion that regenerative soil-building farming practices can enhance the nutritional profile of conventionally grown plant and animal foods. PeerJ Inc. 2022-01-27 /pmc/articles/PMC8801175/ /pubmed/35127297 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.12848 Text en © 2022 Montgomery et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) , which permits using, remixing, and building upon the work non-commercially, as long as it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited.
spellingShingle Agricultural Science
Montgomery, David R.
Biklé, Anne
Archuleta, Ray
Brown, Paul
Jordan, Jazmin
Soil health and nutrient density: preliminary comparison of regenerative and conventional farming
title Soil health and nutrient density: preliminary comparison of regenerative and conventional farming
title_full Soil health and nutrient density: preliminary comparison of regenerative and conventional farming
title_fullStr Soil health and nutrient density: preliminary comparison of regenerative and conventional farming
title_full_unstemmed Soil health and nutrient density: preliminary comparison of regenerative and conventional farming
title_short Soil health and nutrient density: preliminary comparison of regenerative and conventional farming
title_sort soil health and nutrient density: preliminary comparison of regenerative and conventional farming
topic Agricultural Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8801175/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35127297
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.12848
work_keys_str_mv AT montgomerydavidr soilhealthandnutrientdensitypreliminarycomparisonofregenerativeandconventionalfarming
AT bikleanne soilhealthandnutrientdensitypreliminarycomparisonofregenerativeandconventionalfarming
AT archuletaray soilhealthandnutrientdensitypreliminarycomparisonofregenerativeandconventionalfarming
AT brownpaul soilhealthandnutrientdensitypreliminarycomparisonofregenerativeandconventionalfarming
AT jordanjazmin soilhealthandnutrientdensitypreliminarycomparisonofregenerativeandconventionalfarming