Cargando…

Breast cancer detection across dense and non-dense breasts: Markers of diagnostic confidence and efficacy

BACKGROUND: The impact of radiologists’ characteristics has become a major focus of recent research. However, the markers of diagnostic efficacy and confidence in dense and non-dense breasts are poorly understood. PURPOSE: This study aims to assess the relationship between radiologists’ characterist...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hadadi, Ibrahim, Rae, William, Clarke, Jillian, McEntee, Mark, Ekpo, Ernest
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8801646/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35111337
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/20584601211072279
_version_ 1784642509668876288
author Hadadi, Ibrahim
Rae, William
Clarke, Jillian
McEntee, Mark
Ekpo, Ernest
author_facet Hadadi, Ibrahim
Rae, William
Clarke, Jillian
McEntee, Mark
Ekpo, Ernest
author_sort Hadadi, Ibrahim
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The impact of radiologists’ characteristics has become a major focus of recent research. However, the markers of diagnostic efficacy and confidence in dense and non-dense breasts are poorly understood. PURPOSE: This study aims to assess the relationship between radiologists’ characteristics and diagnostic performance across dense and non-dense breasts. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Radiologists specialising in breast imaging (n = 128) who had 0.5–40 (13±10.6) years of experience reading mammograms were recruited. Participants independently interpreted a test set containing 60 digital mammograms (40 normal and 20 abnormal) with similarly distributed breast densities. Diagnostic performance measures were analysed via Jamovi software (version 1.6.22). RESULTS: In dense breasts, breast-imaging fellowship completion significantly improved specificity (p = 0.004), location sensitivity (p = 0.01) and the area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic (p = 0.03). Only participation in BreastScreen reading significantly improved all performance metrics: specificity (p = 0.04), sensitivity (p = 0.005), location sensitivity (p < 0.001) and AUC (p < 0.001). Reading > 100 mammograms weekly significantly improved sensitivity (p = 0.03), location sensitivity (p = 0.001), and AUC (p = 0.03).In non-dense breasts, breast fellowship completion significantly improved sensitivity (p = 0.02), location sensitivity (p = 0.04) and AUC (p = 0.002). Participation in BreastScreen reading and reading > 100 mammograms weekly significantly improved only sensitivity (p = 0.002 and p = 0.003, respectively) and location sensitivity (p < 0.001 and p < 0.001, respectively). CONCLUSION: Participating in screening programs, breast fellowships and reading > 100 mammograms weekly are important indicators of the diagnostic performance of radiologists across dense and non-dense breasts. In dense breasts, optimal performance resulted from participation in a breast screening program.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8801646
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88016462022-02-01 Breast cancer detection across dense and non-dense breasts: Markers of diagnostic confidence and efficacy Hadadi, Ibrahim Rae, William Clarke, Jillian McEntee, Mark Ekpo, Ernest Acta Radiol Open Original Article BACKGROUND: The impact of radiologists’ characteristics has become a major focus of recent research. However, the markers of diagnostic efficacy and confidence in dense and non-dense breasts are poorly understood. PURPOSE: This study aims to assess the relationship between radiologists’ characteristics and diagnostic performance across dense and non-dense breasts. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Radiologists specialising in breast imaging (n = 128) who had 0.5–40 (13±10.6) years of experience reading mammograms were recruited. Participants independently interpreted a test set containing 60 digital mammograms (40 normal and 20 abnormal) with similarly distributed breast densities. Diagnostic performance measures were analysed via Jamovi software (version 1.6.22). RESULTS: In dense breasts, breast-imaging fellowship completion significantly improved specificity (p = 0.004), location sensitivity (p = 0.01) and the area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic (p = 0.03). Only participation in BreastScreen reading significantly improved all performance metrics: specificity (p = 0.04), sensitivity (p = 0.005), location sensitivity (p < 0.001) and AUC (p < 0.001). Reading > 100 mammograms weekly significantly improved sensitivity (p = 0.03), location sensitivity (p = 0.001), and AUC (p = 0.03).In non-dense breasts, breast fellowship completion significantly improved sensitivity (p = 0.02), location sensitivity (p = 0.04) and AUC (p = 0.002). Participation in BreastScreen reading and reading > 100 mammograms weekly significantly improved only sensitivity (p = 0.002 and p = 0.003, respectively) and location sensitivity (p < 0.001 and p < 0.001, respectively). CONCLUSION: Participating in screening programs, breast fellowships and reading > 100 mammograms weekly are important indicators of the diagnostic performance of radiologists across dense and non-dense breasts. In dense breasts, optimal performance resulted from participation in a breast screening program. SAGE Publications 2022-01-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8801646/ /pubmed/35111337 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/20584601211072279 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Article
Hadadi, Ibrahim
Rae, William
Clarke, Jillian
McEntee, Mark
Ekpo, Ernest
Breast cancer detection across dense and non-dense breasts: Markers of diagnostic confidence and efficacy
title Breast cancer detection across dense and non-dense breasts: Markers of diagnostic confidence and efficacy
title_full Breast cancer detection across dense and non-dense breasts: Markers of diagnostic confidence and efficacy
title_fullStr Breast cancer detection across dense and non-dense breasts: Markers of diagnostic confidence and efficacy
title_full_unstemmed Breast cancer detection across dense and non-dense breasts: Markers of diagnostic confidence and efficacy
title_short Breast cancer detection across dense and non-dense breasts: Markers of diagnostic confidence and efficacy
title_sort breast cancer detection across dense and non-dense breasts: markers of diagnostic confidence and efficacy
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8801646/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35111337
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/20584601211072279
work_keys_str_mv AT hadadiibrahim breastcancerdetectionacrossdenseandnondensebreastsmarkersofdiagnosticconfidenceandefficacy
AT raewilliam breastcancerdetectionacrossdenseandnondensebreastsmarkersofdiagnosticconfidenceandefficacy
AT clarkejillian breastcancerdetectionacrossdenseandnondensebreastsmarkersofdiagnosticconfidenceandefficacy
AT mcenteemark breastcancerdetectionacrossdenseandnondensebreastsmarkersofdiagnosticconfidenceandefficacy
AT ekpoernest breastcancerdetectionacrossdenseandnondensebreastsmarkersofdiagnosticconfidenceandefficacy