Cargando…

Glycaemic control during the COVID-19 pandemic: A catastrophe or a sign of hope for the person with type 1 Diabetes Mellitus?

INTRODUCTION: In a person with type 1 diabetes, any change concerning daily routine may lead to changes in glycaemic control. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of work and lockdown on glycaemic control in adults with type 1 diabetes. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective cohort was stratified...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ramalho, Diogo, Rouxinol-Dias, Ana, Tavares, Patrícia, Correia, Sara, Almeida, Lúcia, Alves, Helena, Rocha, Gustavo, Oliveira, Maria João
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SEEN y SED. Published by Elsevier España, S.L.U. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8802186/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35128336
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.endinu.2021.10.015
Descripción
Sumario:INTRODUCTION: In a person with type 1 diabetes, any change concerning daily routine may lead to changes in glycaemic control. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of work and lockdown on glycaemic control in adults with type 1 diabetes. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective cohort was stratified into three activity groups (g1-students/telework/laid-off; g2-unemployed/retired; g3-work without lockdown). Continuous and categorical variations (reductions ≥ 0.4%) in glycated haemoglobin were obtained in 2020 (t3:December/2019–March/2020; t4:April/2020–July/2020) and in homologous periods of 2019. Intragroup comparisons between years and intergroups in the same year were made. Regression models were developed to predict the variation of glycated haemoglobin in 2020. RESULTS: 241 participants were included, with a significant reduction between t4 and t3 (vs. t2 and t1) in g1 (p < 0.001) and g2 (p = 0.025) and in 2020 in g1 (vs. g2, p < 0.001; vs. g3, p < 0.001). Only g1 presented superiority in the reduction ≥0.4% in glycated haemoglobin in 2020 (vs. 2019, p < 0.001; vs. g2, p < 0.001; vs. g3, p < 0.001). The insulin regimens were comparable and the development of hypoglycaemia was found to be superimposed between t3 and t4, except for g1, which was higher at t3 (p = 0.029). G1 correlated with continuous reductions (vs. g2, p = 0.001; vs. g3, p < 0.001) and ≥0.4% in glycated haemoglobin in 2020 (vs. g2, OR 3.6, p < 0.001; vs. g3, OR 12.7, p < 0.001), regardless of the age and duration of type 1 diabetes. CONCLUSIONS: A more stable and better glycaemic control was observed in participants who transitioned from face-to-face work to total lockdown.