Cargando…

The challenge of measuring spinopelvic parameters: inter-rater reliability before and after minimally invasive lumbar spondylodesis

BACKGROUND: The common manual measurement technique of spinal sagittal alignment on X-rays is susceptible to rater-dependent variability, which has not been adequately considered in previous publications. This study investigates the effect of those variations in the characterization of patients rece...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hohenhaus, Marc, Volz, Florian, Merz, Yorn, Watzlawick, Ralf, Scholz, Christoph, Hubbe, Ulrich, Klingler, Jan-Helge
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8802499/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35101020
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-022-05055-9
_version_ 1784642693164433408
author Hohenhaus, Marc
Volz, Florian
Merz, Yorn
Watzlawick, Ralf
Scholz, Christoph
Hubbe, Ulrich
Klingler, Jan-Helge
author_facet Hohenhaus, Marc
Volz, Florian
Merz, Yorn
Watzlawick, Ralf
Scholz, Christoph
Hubbe, Ulrich
Klingler, Jan-Helge
author_sort Hohenhaus, Marc
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The common manual measurement technique of spinal sagittal alignment on X-rays is susceptible to rater-dependent variability, which has not been adequately considered in previous publications. This study investigates the effect of those variations in the characterization of patients receiving lumbar spondylodesis. METHODS: General alignment parameters on pre- and postoperative X-rays were evaluated by four raters in 43 prospectively sampled patients undergoing monolevel spondylodesis. The Intra-class Correlation Coefficient (ICC) for each rater pair and all raters together was calculated for inter-rater reliability. For the operation-induced change of the sagittal alignment in every patient the Wilcoxon test was applied to compare for each rater separately. RESULTS: The ICCs were “good” (>0.75) to “excellent” (>0.9) for all raters together and for 45 of the 48 single rater pairs (93.75%). All revealed a significant increase of the addressed segmental lordosis and disc height and no significant change for spinopelvic parameters and sagittal vertical axis from pre- to postoperative. The lumbar lordosis showed a significant increase through the operation of +2.5° (p = 0.014) and +3.7° (p = 0.015) in two raters and no difference for the other ones (+2.1°, p = 0.171; -2.2°, p = 0.522). CONCLUSIONS: The pre- to postoperative change of lumbar lordosis revealed different significance levels for different raters, although the ICCs were formally good. Accordingly, the evaluation by only one rater would lead to different conclusions. Due to this susceptibility of alignment measurements to rater-dependent variability, the exact evaluation process should be described in every publication and the consistency of significant results be validated through multiple raters. TRIALS REGISTRATION: The trial was approved by the local ethics committee and listed at the national clinical trials register (DRKS00004514, date of registration: 08/11/2012). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12891-022-05055-9.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8802499
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88024992022-02-02 The challenge of measuring spinopelvic parameters: inter-rater reliability before and after minimally invasive lumbar spondylodesis Hohenhaus, Marc Volz, Florian Merz, Yorn Watzlawick, Ralf Scholz, Christoph Hubbe, Ulrich Klingler, Jan-Helge BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research BACKGROUND: The common manual measurement technique of spinal sagittal alignment on X-rays is susceptible to rater-dependent variability, which has not been adequately considered in previous publications. This study investigates the effect of those variations in the characterization of patients receiving lumbar spondylodesis. METHODS: General alignment parameters on pre- and postoperative X-rays were evaluated by four raters in 43 prospectively sampled patients undergoing monolevel spondylodesis. The Intra-class Correlation Coefficient (ICC) for each rater pair and all raters together was calculated for inter-rater reliability. For the operation-induced change of the sagittal alignment in every patient the Wilcoxon test was applied to compare for each rater separately. RESULTS: The ICCs were “good” (>0.75) to “excellent” (>0.9) for all raters together and for 45 of the 48 single rater pairs (93.75%). All revealed a significant increase of the addressed segmental lordosis and disc height and no significant change for spinopelvic parameters and sagittal vertical axis from pre- to postoperative. The lumbar lordosis showed a significant increase through the operation of +2.5° (p = 0.014) and +3.7° (p = 0.015) in two raters and no difference for the other ones (+2.1°, p = 0.171; -2.2°, p = 0.522). CONCLUSIONS: The pre- to postoperative change of lumbar lordosis revealed different significance levels for different raters, although the ICCs were formally good. Accordingly, the evaluation by only one rater would lead to different conclusions. Due to this susceptibility of alignment measurements to rater-dependent variability, the exact evaluation process should be described in every publication and the consistency of significant results be validated through multiple raters. TRIALS REGISTRATION: The trial was approved by the local ethics committee and listed at the national clinical trials register (DRKS00004514, date of registration: 08/11/2012). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12891-022-05055-9. BioMed Central 2022-01-31 /pmc/articles/PMC8802499/ /pubmed/35101020 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-022-05055-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Hohenhaus, Marc
Volz, Florian
Merz, Yorn
Watzlawick, Ralf
Scholz, Christoph
Hubbe, Ulrich
Klingler, Jan-Helge
The challenge of measuring spinopelvic parameters: inter-rater reliability before and after minimally invasive lumbar spondylodesis
title The challenge of measuring spinopelvic parameters: inter-rater reliability before and after minimally invasive lumbar spondylodesis
title_full The challenge of measuring spinopelvic parameters: inter-rater reliability before and after minimally invasive lumbar spondylodesis
title_fullStr The challenge of measuring spinopelvic parameters: inter-rater reliability before and after minimally invasive lumbar spondylodesis
title_full_unstemmed The challenge of measuring spinopelvic parameters: inter-rater reliability before and after minimally invasive lumbar spondylodesis
title_short The challenge of measuring spinopelvic parameters: inter-rater reliability before and after minimally invasive lumbar spondylodesis
title_sort challenge of measuring spinopelvic parameters: inter-rater reliability before and after minimally invasive lumbar spondylodesis
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8802499/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35101020
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-022-05055-9
work_keys_str_mv AT hohenhausmarc thechallengeofmeasuringspinopelvicparametersinterraterreliabilitybeforeandafterminimallyinvasivelumbarspondylodesis
AT volzflorian thechallengeofmeasuringspinopelvicparametersinterraterreliabilitybeforeandafterminimallyinvasivelumbarspondylodesis
AT merzyorn thechallengeofmeasuringspinopelvicparametersinterraterreliabilitybeforeandafterminimallyinvasivelumbarspondylodesis
AT watzlawickralf thechallengeofmeasuringspinopelvicparametersinterraterreliabilitybeforeandafterminimallyinvasivelumbarspondylodesis
AT scholzchristoph thechallengeofmeasuringspinopelvicparametersinterraterreliabilitybeforeandafterminimallyinvasivelumbarspondylodesis
AT hubbeulrich thechallengeofmeasuringspinopelvicparametersinterraterreliabilitybeforeandafterminimallyinvasivelumbarspondylodesis
AT klinglerjanhelge thechallengeofmeasuringspinopelvicparametersinterraterreliabilitybeforeandafterminimallyinvasivelumbarspondylodesis
AT hohenhausmarc challengeofmeasuringspinopelvicparametersinterraterreliabilitybeforeandafterminimallyinvasivelumbarspondylodesis
AT volzflorian challengeofmeasuringspinopelvicparametersinterraterreliabilitybeforeandafterminimallyinvasivelumbarspondylodesis
AT merzyorn challengeofmeasuringspinopelvicparametersinterraterreliabilitybeforeandafterminimallyinvasivelumbarspondylodesis
AT watzlawickralf challengeofmeasuringspinopelvicparametersinterraterreliabilitybeforeandafterminimallyinvasivelumbarspondylodesis
AT scholzchristoph challengeofmeasuringspinopelvicparametersinterraterreliabilitybeforeandafterminimallyinvasivelumbarspondylodesis
AT hubbeulrich challengeofmeasuringspinopelvicparametersinterraterreliabilitybeforeandafterminimallyinvasivelumbarspondylodesis
AT klinglerjanhelge challengeofmeasuringspinopelvicparametersinterraterreliabilitybeforeandafterminimallyinvasivelumbarspondylodesis