Cargando…
Prevalence of Depression in Patients With Post-Acute Coronary Syndrome and the Role of Cardiac Rehabilitation in Reducing the Risk of Depression: A Systematic Review
Patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) or ischaemic heart disease are at risk of developing anxiety and depression. This systematic review aims to identify the various risk factors and the role of cardiac rehabilitation in reducing the risk of depression in patients after AMI. In this revie...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cureus
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8802655/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35141096 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.20851 |
Sumario: | Patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) or ischaemic heart disease are at risk of developing anxiety and depression. This systematic review aims to identify the various risk factors and the role of cardiac rehabilitation in reducing the risk of depression in patients after AMI. In this review, we included data on the prevalence of depression in patients post-AMI for the years 2016-2017 from a cardiac rehabilitation unit at Morriston Hospital, Swansea, a primary coronary angioplasty centre. Results from our meta-analysis were compared with the findings of previous studies. Our data showed the prevalence of depression to be 14% pre-cardiac rehabilitation and 3% post-cardiac rehabilitation. A meta-analysis of seven studies showed the prevalence to be approximately 20-35% depending on the type of questionnaire or screening method used. Gender, marital status, age, and sedentary lifestyle were found to be risk factors for depression post-acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Females, patients aged >65 years, and those who were single, lived alone, or widowed were at a higher risk of depression, and patients with sedentary lifestyles were more likely to have post-ACS depression. Depression in patients post-myocardial infarction was also associated with increased mortality and morbidity risk as well as higher hospital re-admission and future cardiac events. The meta-analysis showed significant publication bias, studies with negative results were less likely to be published, and the study data were heterogeneous. The pooled estimate for depression estimated using the random-effects model was 1.78 (95% confidence interval = 1.58-2.01). |
---|