Cargando…

Factors of influence in prisoner’s dilemma task: a review of medical literature

The Prisoner’s Dilemma (PD) is one of the most popular concepts amongst the scientific literature. The task is used in order to study different types of social interactions by giving participants the choice to defect or cooperate in a specific social setting/dilemma. This review focuses on the techn...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mantas, Vasileios, Pehlivanidis, Artemios, Kotoula, Vasileia, Papanikolaou, Katerina, Vassiliou, Georgia, Papaiakovou, Anthoula, Papageorgiou, Charalambos
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: PeerJ Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8802712/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35174016
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.12829
_version_ 1784642727194918912
author Mantas, Vasileios
Pehlivanidis, Artemios
Kotoula, Vasileia
Papanikolaou, Katerina
Vassiliou, Georgia
Papaiakovou, Anthoula
Papageorgiou, Charalambos
author_facet Mantas, Vasileios
Pehlivanidis, Artemios
Kotoula, Vasileia
Papanikolaou, Katerina
Vassiliou, Georgia
Papaiakovou, Anthoula
Papageorgiou, Charalambos
author_sort Mantas, Vasileios
collection PubMed
description The Prisoner’s Dilemma (PD) is one of the most popular concepts amongst the scientific literature. The task is used in order to study different types of social interactions by giving participants the choice to defect or cooperate in a specific social setting/dilemma. This review focuses on the technical characteristics of the PD task as it is used in medical literature and describes how the different PD settings could influence the players’ behaviour. We identify all the studies that have used the PD task in medical research with human participants and distinguish, following a heuristic approach, seven parameters that can differentiate a PD task, namely (a) the opponent parties’ composition; (b) the type of the opponent as perceived by the players; (c) the interaction flow of the game; (d) the number of rounds; (e) the instructions narrative and options that are given to players; (f) the strategy and (g) the reward matrix and payoffs of the game. We describe how each parameter could influence the final outcome of the PD task and highlight the great variability concerning the settings of these parameters in medical research. Our aim is to point out the heterogeneity of such methods in the past literature and to assist future researchers with their methodology design.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8802712
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher PeerJ Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88027122022-02-15 Factors of influence in prisoner’s dilemma task: a review of medical literature Mantas, Vasileios Pehlivanidis, Artemios Kotoula, Vasileia Papanikolaou, Katerina Vassiliou, Georgia Papaiakovou, Anthoula Papageorgiou, Charalambos PeerJ Psychiatry and Psychology The Prisoner’s Dilemma (PD) is one of the most popular concepts amongst the scientific literature. The task is used in order to study different types of social interactions by giving participants the choice to defect or cooperate in a specific social setting/dilemma. This review focuses on the technical characteristics of the PD task as it is used in medical literature and describes how the different PD settings could influence the players’ behaviour. We identify all the studies that have used the PD task in medical research with human participants and distinguish, following a heuristic approach, seven parameters that can differentiate a PD task, namely (a) the opponent parties’ composition; (b) the type of the opponent as perceived by the players; (c) the interaction flow of the game; (d) the number of rounds; (e) the instructions narrative and options that are given to players; (f) the strategy and (g) the reward matrix and payoffs of the game. We describe how each parameter could influence the final outcome of the PD task and highlight the great variability concerning the settings of these parameters in medical research. Our aim is to point out the heterogeneity of such methods in the past literature and to assist future researchers with their methodology design. PeerJ Inc. 2022-01-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8802712/ /pubmed/35174016 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.12829 Text en © 2022 Mantas et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited.
spellingShingle Psychiatry and Psychology
Mantas, Vasileios
Pehlivanidis, Artemios
Kotoula, Vasileia
Papanikolaou, Katerina
Vassiliou, Georgia
Papaiakovou, Anthoula
Papageorgiou, Charalambos
Factors of influence in prisoner’s dilemma task: a review of medical literature
title Factors of influence in prisoner’s dilemma task: a review of medical literature
title_full Factors of influence in prisoner’s dilemma task: a review of medical literature
title_fullStr Factors of influence in prisoner’s dilemma task: a review of medical literature
title_full_unstemmed Factors of influence in prisoner’s dilemma task: a review of medical literature
title_short Factors of influence in prisoner’s dilemma task: a review of medical literature
title_sort factors of influence in prisoner’s dilemma task: a review of medical literature
topic Psychiatry and Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8802712/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35174016
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.12829
work_keys_str_mv AT mantasvasileios factorsofinfluenceinprisonersdilemmataskareviewofmedicalliterature
AT pehlivanidisartemios factorsofinfluenceinprisonersdilemmataskareviewofmedicalliterature
AT kotoulavasileia factorsofinfluenceinprisonersdilemmataskareviewofmedicalliterature
AT papanikolaoukaterina factorsofinfluenceinprisonersdilemmataskareviewofmedicalliterature
AT vassiliougeorgia factorsofinfluenceinprisonersdilemmataskareviewofmedicalliterature
AT papaiakovouanthoula factorsofinfluenceinprisonersdilemmataskareviewofmedicalliterature
AT papageorgioucharalambos factorsofinfluenceinprisonersdilemmataskareviewofmedicalliterature