Cargando…
Factors of influence in prisoner’s dilemma task: a review of medical literature
The Prisoner’s Dilemma (PD) is one of the most popular concepts amongst the scientific literature. The task is used in order to study different types of social interactions by giving participants the choice to defect or cooperate in a specific social setting/dilemma. This review focuses on the techn...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
PeerJ Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8802712/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35174016 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.12829 |
_version_ | 1784642727194918912 |
---|---|
author | Mantas, Vasileios Pehlivanidis, Artemios Kotoula, Vasileia Papanikolaou, Katerina Vassiliou, Georgia Papaiakovou, Anthoula Papageorgiou, Charalambos |
author_facet | Mantas, Vasileios Pehlivanidis, Artemios Kotoula, Vasileia Papanikolaou, Katerina Vassiliou, Georgia Papaiakovou, Anthoula Papageorgiou, Charalambos |
author_sort | Mantas, Vasileios |
collection | PubMed |
description | The Prisoner’s Dilemma (PD) is one of the most popular concepts amongst the scientific literature. The task is used in order to study different types of social interactions by giving participants the choice to defect or cooperate in a specific social setting/dilemma. This review focuses on the technical characteristics of the PD task as it is used in medical literature and describes how the different PD settings could influence the players’ behaviour. We identify all the studies that have used the PD task in medical research with human participants and distinguish, following a heuristic approach, seven parameters that can differentiate a PD task, namely (a) the opponent parties’ composition; (b) the type of the opponent as perceived by the players; (c) the interaction flow of the game; (d) the number of rounds; (e) the instructions narrative and options that are given to players; (f) the strategy and (g) the reward matrix and payoffs of the game. We describe how each parameter could influence the final outcome of the PD task and highlight the great variability concerning the settings of these parameters in medical research. Our aim is to point out the heterogeneity of such methods in the past literature and to assist future researchers with their methodology design. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8802712 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | PeerJ Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88027122022-02-15 Factors of influence in prisoner’s dilemma task: a review of medical literature Mantas, Vasileios Pehlivanidis, Artemios Kotoula, Vasileia Papanikolaou, Katerina Vassiliou, Georgia Papaiakovou, Anthoula Papageorgiou, Charalambos PeerJ Psychiatry and Psychology The Prisoner’s Dilemma (PD) is one of the most popular concepts amongst the scientific literature. The task is used in order to study different types of social interactions by giving participants the choice to defect or cooperate in a specific social setting/dilemma. This review focuses on the technical characteristics of the PD task as it is used in medical literature and describes how the different PD settings could influence the players’ behaviour. We identify all the studies that have used the PD task in medical research with human participants and distinguish, following a heuristic approach, seven parameters that can differentiate a PD task, namely (a) the opponent parties’ composition; (b) the type of the opponent as perceived by the players; (c) the interaction flow of the game; (d) the number of rounds; (e) the instructions narrative and options that are given to players; (f) the strategy and (g) the reward matrix and payoffs of the game. We describe how each parameter could influence the final outcome of the PD task and highlight the great variability concerning the settings of these parameters in medical research. Our aim is to point out the heterogeneity of such methods in the past literature and to assist future researchers with their methodology design. PeerJ Inc. 2022-01-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8802712/ /pubmed/35174016 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.12829 Text en © 2022 Mantas et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited. |
spellingShingle | Psychiatry and Psychology Mantas, Vasileios Pehlivanidis, Artemios Kotoula, Vasileia Papanikolaou, Katerina Vassiliou, Georgia Papaiakovou, Anthoula Papageorgiou, Charalambos Factors of influence in prisoner’s dilemma task: a review of medical literature |
title | Factors of influence in prisoner’s dilemma task: a review of medical literature |
title_full | Factors of influence in prisoner’s dilemma task: a review of medical literature |
title_fullStr | Factors of influence in prisoner’s dilemma task: a review of medical literature |
title_full_unstemmed | Factors of influence in prisoner’s dilemma task: a review of medical literature |
title_short | Factors of influence in prisoner’s dilemma task: a review of medical literature |
title_sort | factors of influence in prisoner’s dilemma task: a review of medical literature |
topic | Psychiatry and Psychology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8802712/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35174016 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.12829 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mantasvasileios factorsofinfluenceinprisonersdilemmataskareviewofmedicalliterature AT pehlivanidisartemios factorsofinfluenceinprisonersdilemmataskareviewofmedicalliterature AT kotoulavasileia factorsofinfluenceinprisonersdilemmataskareviewofmedicalliterature AT papanikolaoukaterina factorsofinfluenceinprisonersdilemmataskareviewofmedicalliterature AT vassiliougeorgia factorsofinfluenceinprisonersdilemmataskareviewofmedicalliterature AT papaiakovouanthoula factorsofinfluenceinprisonersdilemmataskareviewofmedicalliterature AT papageorgioucharalambos factorsofinfluenceinprisonersdilemmataskareviewofmedicalliterature |