Cargando…

Morphometrics for sports mechanics: Showcasing tennis racket shape diversity

Tennis racket design has changed from its conception in 1874. While we know that modern tennis rackets are lighter and have larger heads than their wooden predecessors, it is unknown how their gross shape has changed specifically. It is also unknown how racket shape is related to factors that influe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Grant, Robyn A., Taraborrelli, Luca, Allen, Tom
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8803194/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35100318
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0263120
_version_ 1784642821066588160
author Grant, Robyn A.
Taraborrelli, Luca
Allen, Tom
author_facet Grant, Robyn A.
Taraborrelli, Luca
Allen, Tom
author_sort Grant, Robyn A.
collection PubMed
description Tennis racket design has changed from its conception in 1874. While we know that modern tennis rackets are lighter and have larger heads than their wooden predecessors, it is unknown how their gross shape has changed specifically. It is also unknown how racket shape is related to factors that influence performance, like the Transverse and Polar moments of inertia. The aim of this study was to quantify how tennis racket shape has changed over time, with a view to furthering our understanding of how such developments have influenced the game. Two-dimensional morphometric analysis was applied to silhouettes extracted from photographs of 514 rackets dating from 1874 to 2017. A principal component analysis was conducted on silhouette outlines, to allow racket shape to be summarised. The rackets were grouped by age and material for further analysis. Principal Component 1 accounted for 87% of the variation in racket shape. A pairwise Pearson’s correlation test indicated that head width and length were both strongly correlated to Principal Component 1 (r = 0.916 & r = 0.801, p-values<0.001). Principal Component 1 was also correlated to the Polar (r = 0.862, p<0.001) and Transverse (r = -0.506, p<0.001) moments of inertia. Racket age and material had a medium (p<0.001, η2p = 0.074) and small (p = 0.015, η2p = 0.017) effect on Principal Component 1, respectively. Mean racket shapes were also generated from the morphometric analyses for the material and age groupings, and we consider how these shape changes may have influenced performance and injury risk. These mean shape groupings could support the development of models, such as finite element analysis, for predicting how historical developments in tennis equipment have affected performance and injury risk.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8803194
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88031942022-02-01 Morphometrics for sports mechanics: Showcasing tennis racket shape diversity Grant, Robyn A. Taraborrelli, Luca Allen, Tom PLoS One Research Article Tennis racket design has changed from its conception in 1874. While we know that modern tennis rackets are lighter and have larger heads than their wooden predecessors, it is unknown how their gross shape has changed specifically. It is also unknown how racket shape is related to factors that influence performance, like the Transverse and Polar moments of inertia. The aim of this study was to quantify how tennis racket shape has changed over time, with a view to furthering our understanding of how such developments have influenced the game. Two-dimensional morphometric analysis was applied to silhouettes extracted from photographs of 514 rackets dating from 1874 to 2017. A principal component analysis was conducted on silhouette outlines, to allow racket shape to be summarised. The rackets were grouped by age and material for further analysis. Principal Component 1 accounted for 87% of the variation in racket shape. A pairwise Pearson’s correlation test indicated that head width and length were both strongly correlated to Principal Component 1 (r = 0.916 & r = 0.801, p-values<0.001). Principal Component 1 was also correlated to the Polar (r = 0.862, p<0.001) and Transverse (r = -0.506, p<0.001) moments of inertia. Racket age and material had a medium (p<0.001, η2p = 0.074) and small (p = 0.015, η2p = 0.017) effect on Principal Component 1, respectively. Mean racket shapes were also generated from the morphometric analyses for the material and age groupings, and we consider how these shape changes may have influenced performance and injury risk. These mean shape groupings could support the development of models, such as finite element analysis, for predicting how historical developments in tennis equipment have affected performance and injury risk. Public Library of Science 2022-01-31 /pmc/articles/PMC8803194/ /pubmed/35100318 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0263120 Text en © 2022 Grant et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Grant, Robyn A.
Taraborrelli, Luca
Allen, Tom
Morphometrics for sports mechanics: Showcasing tennis racket shape diversity
title Morphometrics for sports mechanics: Showcasing tennis racket shape diversity
title_full Morphometrics for sports mechanics: Showcasing tennis racket shape diversity
title_fullStr Morphometrics for sports mechanics: Showcasing tennis racket shape diversity
title_full_unstemmed Morphometrics for sports mechanics: Showcasing tennis racket shape diversity
title_short Morphometrics for sports mechanics: Showcasing tennis racket shape diversity
title_sort morphometrics for sports mechanics: showcasing tennis racket shape diversity
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8803194/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35100318
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0263120
work_keys_str_mv AT grantrobyna morphometricsforsportsmechanicsshowcasingtennisracketshapediversity
AT taraborrelliluca morphometricsforsportsmechanicsshowcasingtennisracketshapediversity
AT allentom morphometricsforsportsmechanicsshowcasingtennisracketshapediversity