Cargando…

Introductory patient communication training for medical physics graduate students: Pilot experience

Despite medical physics becoming a more patient‐facing part of the radiation oncology team, medical physics graduate students have no training in patient communication. An introductory patient communication training for medical physics graduate students is presented here. This training exposes parti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Padilla, Laura, Meleski, Whitney Burton, Dominick, Caitlin, Athing, Caroline, Jones, Cassidy L., Burns, Dana, Cathers, Lauretta A., Fields, Emma C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8803301/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34708923
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13449
_version_ 1784642840228265984
author Padilla, Laura
Meleski, Whitney Burton
Dominick, Caitlin
Athing, Caroline
Jones, Cassidy L.
Burns, Dana
Cathers, Lauretta A.
Fields, Emma C.
author_facet Padilla, Laura
Meleski, Whitney Burton
Dominick, Caitlin
Athing, Caroline
Jones, Cassidy L.
Burns, Dana
Cathers, Lauretta A.
Fields, Emma C.
author_sort Padilla, Laura
collection PubMed
description Despite medical physics becoming a more patient‐facing part of the radiation oncology team, medical physics graduate students have no training in patient communication. An introductory patient communication training for medical physics graduate students is presented here. This training exposes participants to foundational concepts and effective communication skills through a lecture and it allows them to apply these concepts through realistic simulated patient interactions. The training was conducted virtually, and eight students participated. The impact of the training was evaluated based on changes in both confidence and competence of the participants’ patient communication skills. Participants were asked to fill out a survey to assess their confidence on communicating with patients before and after the training. They also underwent a simulated patient interaction pre‐ and postlecture. Their performance during these was evaluated by both the simulated patient actors and the participants themselves using a rubric. Each data set was paired and analyzed for significance using a Wilcoxon rank‐sum test with an alpha of 0.05. Participants reported significantly higher confidence in their feeling of preparedness to interact with patients (mean = 2.38 vs. 3.88, p = 0.008), comfort interacting independently (mean = 2.00 vs. 4.00, p = 0.002), comfort showing patients they are actively listening (mean = 3.50 vs. 4.50, p = 0.005), and confidence handling challenging patient interactions (mean = 1.88 vs. 3.38, p = 0.01), after the training. Their encounter scores, as evaluated by the simulated patient actors, significantly increased (mean = 77% vs. 91%, p = 0.022). Self‐evaluation scores increased, but not significantly (mean = 62% vs. 68%, p = 0.184). The difference between the simulated patient and self‐evaluation scores for the postinstruction encounter was statistically significant (p = 0.0014). This patient communication training for medical physics graduate students is effective at increasing both the confidence and the competence of the participants in the subject. We propose that similar trainings be incorporated into medical physics graduate training programs prior to students entering into residency.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8803301
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88033012022-02-04 Introductory patient communication training for medical physics graduate students: Pilot experience Padilla, Laura Meleski, Whitney Burton Dominick, Caitlin Athing, Caroline Jones, Cassidy L. Burns, Dana Cathers, Lauretta A. Fields, Emma C. J Appl Clin Med Phys Technical Notes Despite medical physics becoming a more patient‐facing part of the radiation oncology team, medical physics graduate students have no training in patient communication. An introductory patient communication training for medical physics graduate students is presented here. This training exposes participants to foundational concepts and effective communication skills through a lecture and it allows them to apply these concepts through realistic simulated patient interactions. The training was conducted virtually, and eight students participated. The impact of the training was evaluated based on changes in both confidence and competence of the participants’ patient communication skills. Participants were asked to fill out a survey to assess their confidence on communicating with patients before and after the training. They also underwent a simulated patient interaction pre‐ and postlecture. Their performance during these was evaluated by both the simulated patient actors and the participants themselves using a rubric. Each data set was paired and analyzed for significance using a Wilcoxon rank‐sum test with an alpha of 0.05. Participants reported significantly higher confidence in their feeling of preparedness to interact with patients (mean = 2.38 vs. 3.88, p = 0.008), comfort interacting independently (mean = 2.00 vs. 4.00, p = 0.002), comfort showing patients they are actively listening (mean = 3.50 vs. 4.50, p = 0.005), and confidence handling challenging patient interactions (mean = 1.88 vs. 3.38, p = 0.01), after the training. Their encounter scores, as evaluated by the simulated patient actors, significantly increased (mean = 77% vs. 91%, p = 0.022). Self‐evaluation scores increased, but not significantly (mean = 62% vs. 68%, p = 0.184). The difference between the simulated patient and self‐evaluation scores for the postinstruction encounter was statistically significant (p = 0.0014). This patient communication training for medical physics graduate students is effective at increasing both the confidence and the competence of the participants in the subject. We propose that similar trainings be incorporated into medical physics graduate training programs prior to students entering into residency. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-10-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8803301/ /pubmed/34708923 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13449 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, LLC on behalf of The American Association of Physicists in Medicine https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Technical Notes
Padilla, Laura
Meleski, Whitney Burton
Dominick, Caitlin
Athing, Caroline
Jones, Cassidy L.
Burns, Dana
Cathers, Lauretta A.
Fields, Emma C.
Introductory patient communication training for medical physics graduate students: Pilot experience
title Introductory patient communication training for medical physics graduate students: Pilot experience
title_full Introductory patient communication training for medical physics graduate students: Pilot experience
title_fullStr Introductory patient communication training for medical physics graduate students: Pilot experience
title_full_unstemmed Introductory patient communication training for medical physics graduate students: Pilot experience
title_short Introductory patient communication training for medical physics graduate students: Pilot experience
title_sort introductory patient communication training for medical physics graduate students: pilot experience
topic Technical Notes
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8803301/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34708923
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13449
work_keys_str_mv AT padillalaura introductorypatientcommunicationtrainingformedicalphysicsgraduatestudentspilotexperience
AT meleskiwhitneyburton introductorypatientcommunicationtrainingformedicalphysicsgraduatestudentspilotexperience
AT dominickcaitlin introductorypatientcommunicationtrainingformedicalphysicsgraduatestudentspilotexperience
AT athingcaroline introductorypatientcommunicationtrainingformedicalphysicsgraduatestudentspilotexperience
AT jonescassidyl introductorypatientcommunicationtrainingformedicalphysicsgraduatestudentspilotexperience
AT burnsdana introductorypatientcommunicationtrainingformedicalphysicsgraduatestudentspilotexperience
AT catherslaurettaa introductorypatientcommunicationtrainingformedicalphysicsgraduatestudentspilotexperience
AT fieldsemmac introductorypatientcommunicationtrainingformedicalphysicsgraduatestudentspilotexperience