Cargando…
Introductory patient communication training for medical physics graduate students: Pilot experience
Despite medical physics becoming a more patient‐facing part of the radiation oncology team, medical physics graduate students have no training in patient communication. An introductory patient communication training for medical physics graduate students is presented here. This training exposes parti...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8803301/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34708923 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13449 |
_version_ | 1784642840228265984 |
---|---|
author | Padilla, Laura Meleski, Whitney Burton Dominick, Caitlin Athing, Caroline Jones, Cassidy L. Burns, Dana Cathers, Lauretta A. Fields, Emma C. |
author_facet | Padilla, Laura Meleski, Whitney Burton Dominick, Caitlin Athing, Caroline Jones, Cassidy L. Burns, Dana Cathers, Lauretta A. Fields, Emma C. |
author_sort | Padilla, Laura |
collection | PubMed |
description | Despite medical physics becoming a more patient‐facing part of the radiation oncology team, medical physics graduate students have no training in patient communication. An introductory patient communication training for medical physics graduate students is presented here. This training exposes participants to foundational concepts and effective communication skills through a lecture and it allows them to apply these concepts through realistic simulated patient interactions. The training was conducted virtually, and eight students participated. The impact of the training was evaluated based on changes in both confidence and competence of the participants’ patient communication skills. Participants were asked to fill out a survey to assess their confidence on communicating with patients before and after the training. They also underwent a simulated patient interaction pre‐ and postlecture. Their performance during these was evaluated by both the simulated patient actors and the participants themselves using a rubric. Each data set was paired and analyzed for significance using a Wilcoxon rank‐sum test with an alpha of 0.05. Participants reported significantly higher confidence in their feeling of preparedness to interact with patients (mean = 2.38 vs. 3.88, p = 0.008), comfort interacting independently (mean = 2.00 vs. 4.00, p = 0.002), comfort showing patients they are actively listening (mean = 3.50 vs. 4.50, p = 0.005), and confidence handling challenging patient interactions (mean = 1.88 vs. 3.38, p = 0.01), after the training. Their encounter scores, as evaluated by the simulated patient actors, significantly increased (mean = 77% vs. 91%, p = 0.022). Self‐evaluation scores increased, but not significantly (mean = 62% vs. 68%, p = 0.184). The difference between the simulated patient and self‐evaluation scores for the postinstruction encounter was statistically significant (p = 0.0014). This patient communication training for medical physics graduate students is effective at increasing both the confidence and the competence of the participants in the subject. We propose that similar trainings be incorporated into medical physics graduate training programs prior to students entering into residency. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8803301 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88033012022-02-04 Introductory patient communication training for medical physics graduate students: Pilot experience Padilla, Laura Meleski, Whitney Burton Dominick, Caitlin Athing, Caroline Jones, Cassidy L. Burns, Dana Cathers, Lauretta A. Fields, Emma C. J Appl Clin Med Phys Technical Notes Despite medical physics becoming a more patient‐facing part of the radiation oncology team, medical physics graduate students have no training in patient communication. An introductory patient communication training for medical physics graduate students is presented here. This training exposes participants to foundational concepts and effective communication skills through a lecture and it allows them to apply these concepts through realistic simulated patient interactions. The training was conducted virtually, and eight students participated. The impact of the training was evaluated based on changes in both confidence and competence of the participants’ patient communication skills. Participants were asked to fill out a survey to assess their confidence on communicating with patients before and after the training. They also underwent a simulated patient interaction pre‐ and postlecture. Their performance during these was evaluated by both the simulated patient actors and the participants themselves using a rubric. Each data set was paired and analyzed for significance using a Wilcoxon rank‐sum test with an alpha of 0.05. Participants reported significantly higher confidence in their feeling of preparedness to interact with patients (mean = 2.38 vs. 3.88, p = 0.008), comfort interacting independently (mean = 2.00 vs. 4.00, p = 0.002), comfort showing patients they are actively listening (mean = 3.50 vs. 4.50, p = 0.005), and confidence handling challenging patient interactions (mean = 1.88 vs. 3.38, p = 0.01), after the training. Their encounter scores, as evaluated by the simulated patient actors, significantly increased (mean = 77% vs. 91%, p = 0.022). Self‐evaluation scores increased, but not significantly (mean = 62% vs. 68%, p = 0.184). The difference between the simulated patient and self‐evaluation scores for the postinstruction encounter was statistically significant (p = 0.0014). This patient communication training for medical physics graduate students is effective at increasing both the confidence and the competence of the participants in the subject. We propose that similar trainings be incorporated into medical physics graduate training programs prior to students entering into residency. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-10-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8803301/ /pubmed/34708923 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13449 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, LLC on behalf of The American Association of Physicists in Medicine https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Technical Notes Padilla, Laura Meleski, Whitney Burton Dominick, Caitlin Athing, Caroline Jones, Cassidy L. Burns, Dana Cathers, Lauretta A. Fields, Emma C. Introductory patient communication training for medical physics graduate students: Pilot experience |
title | Introductory patient communication training for medical physics graduate students: Pilot experience |
title_full | Introductory patient communication training for medical physics graduate students: Pilot experience |
title_fullStr | Introductory patient communication training for medical physics graduate students: Pilot experience |
title_full_unstemmed | Introductory patient communication training for medical physics graduate students: Pilot experience |
title_short | Introductory patient communication training for medical physics graduate students: Pilot experience |
title_sort | introductory patient communication training for medical physics graduate students: pilot experience |
topic | Technical Notes |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8803301/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34708923 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13449 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT padillalaura introductorypatientcommunicationtrainingformedicalphysicsgraduatestudentspilotexperience AT meleskiwhitneyburton introductorypatientcommunicationtrainingformedicalphysicsgraduatestudentspilotexperience AT dominickcaitlin introductorypatientcommunicationtrainingformedicalphysicsgraduatestudentspilotexperience AT athingcaroline introductorypatientcommunicationtrainingformedicalphysicsgraduatestudentspilotexperience AT jonescassidyl introductorypatientcommunicationtrainingformedicalphysicsgraduatestudentspilotexperience AT burnsdana introductorypatientcommunicationtrainingformedicalphysicsgraduatestudentspilotexperience AT catherslaurettaa introductorypatientcommunicationtrainingformedicalphysicsgraduatestudentspilotexperience AT fieldsemmac introductorypatientcommunicationtrainingformedicalphysicsgraduatestudentspilotexperience |