Cargando…

Macular pucker formation after inverted internal limiting membrane flap technique: Two case reports

PURPOSE: The inverted internal limiting membrane (ILM) flap technique is generally used to treat refractory macular holes (MHs). Recently, a case of macular pucker formation outside the ILM flap after using silicone oil was reported. Although the pucker formation was attributed to the silicone oil u...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kanda, Keisuke, Nakashima, Hiroshi, Emi, Kazuyuki
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8803473/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35128152
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajoc.2022.101282
_version_ 1784642878215028736
author Kanda, Keisuke
Nakashima, Hiroshi
Emi, Kazuyuki
author_facet Kanda, Keisuke
Nakashima, Hiroshi
Emi, Kazuyuki
author_sort Kanda, Keisuke
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The inverted internal limiting membrane (ILM) flap technique is generally used to treat refractory macular holes (MHs). Recently, a case of macular pucker formation outside the ILM flap after using silicone oil was reported. Although the pucker formation was attributed to the silicone oil use in that case, here we report two cases of macular pucker that occurred after the inverted ILM flap technique was performed without silicone oil. In one case, the ILM flap and proliferated tissue was removed, followed by their histopathological examination. OBSERVATIONS: Two patients with MH underwent vitrectomies using the inverted ILM flap technique. In both patients, the visual acuity worsened postoperatively, and macular pucker formation, associated with the ILM flap, was observed. In one patient, visual acuity improved after ILM flap removal, and histopathological examination of the specimen indicated strong cellular proliferation between the ILMs. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPORTANCE: Following the inverted ILM flap technique, macular pucker may occur even without the use of silicone oil. Removal of the flap and associated proliferative tissue was effective and resulted in no recurrence of MH or pucker. Ophthalmologists should consider the possibility that tissues on the ILM may lead to macular pucker formation especially inside the flap, in the area between the ILMs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8803473
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88034732022-02-04 Macular pucker formation after inverted internal limiting membrane flap technique: Two case reports Kanda, Keisuke Nakashima, Hiroshi Emi, Kazuyuki Am J Ophthalmol Case Rep Case Report PURPOSE: The inverted internal limiting membrane (ILM) flap technique is generally used to treat refractory macular holes (MHs). Recently, a case of macular pucker formation outside the ILM flap after using silicone oil was reported. Although the pucker formation was attributed to the silicone oil use in that case, here we report two cases of macular pucker that occurred after the inverted ILM flap technique was performed without silicone oil. In one case, the ILM flap and proliferated tissue was removed, followed by their histopathological examination. OBSERVATIONS: Two patients with MH underwent vitrectomies using the inverted ILM flap technique. In both patients, the visual acuity worsened postoperatively, and macular pucker formation, associated with the ILM flap, was observed. In one patient, visual acuity improved after ILM flap removal, and histopathological examination of the specimen indicated strong cellular proliferation between the ILMs. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPORTANCE: Following the inverted ILM flap technique, macular pucker may occur even without the use of silicone oil. Removal of the flap and associated proliferative tissue was effective and resulted in no recurrence of MH or pucker. Ophthalmologists should consider the possibility that tissues on the ILM may lead to macular pucker formation especially inside the flap, in the area between the ILMs. Elsevier 2022-01-20 /pmc/articles/PMC8803473/ /pubmed/35128152 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajoc.2022.101282 Text en © 2022 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Case Report
Kanda, Keisuke
Nakashima, Hiroshi
Emi, Kazuyuki
Macular pucker formation after inverted internal limiting membrane flap technique: Two case reports
title Macular pucker formation after inverted internal limiting membrane flap technique: Two case reports
title_full Macular pucker formation after inverted internal limiting membrane flap technique: Two case reports
title_fullStr Macular pucker formation after inverted internal limiting membrane flap technique: Two case reports
title_full_unstemmed Macular pucker formation after inverted internal limiting membrane flap technique: Two case reports
title_short Macular pucker formation after inverted internal limiting membrane flap technique: Two case reports
title_sort macular pucker formation after inverted internal limiting membrane flap technique: two case reports
topic Case Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8803473/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35128152
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajoc.2022.101282
work_keys_str_mv AT kandakeisuke macularpuckerformationafterinvertedinternallimitingmembraneflaptechniquetwocasereports
AT nakashimahiroshi macularpuckerformationafterinvertedinternallimitingmembraneflaptechniquetwocasereports
AT emikazuyuki macularpuckerformationafterinvertedinternallimitingmembraneflaptechniquetwocasereports