Cargando…

Households’ willingness to pay for the rehabilitation of wetlands: evidence from Gudera Wetland, Northwest Ethiopia

Gudera wetland is accredited as a home for innumerable goods and services that have economic value for individuals living around and outside them. However, due to the absence of rehabilitation intervention, the wetland is at the edge of collapse at this time. This paper aims to: (1) estimate househo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Asmare, Erkie, Bekele, Ketema, Fentaw, Saleamlak
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8803591/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35128102
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e08813
_version_ 1784642899786334208
author Asmare, Erkie
Bekele, Ketema
Fentaw, Saleamlak
author_facet Asmare, Erkie
Bekele, Ketema
Fentaw, Saleamlak
author_sort Asmare, Erkie
collection PubMed
description Gudera wetland is accredited as a home for innumerable goods and services that have economic value for individuals living around and outside them. However, due to the absence of rehabilitation intervention, the wetland is at the edge of collapse at this time. This paper aims to: (1) estimate households' mean willingness to pay (WTP) for the rehabilitation of the wetland, (2) investigate determinants that affect the probability and intensity of WTP, and (3) estimate aggregated welfare gains from the intervention. To address these objectives, data from 237 household heads were collected using a two-stage random sampling procedure. For the analysis, econometric models, such as bivariate probit and double hurdle, were employed to estimate the mean WTP and determinants of WTP, respectively. The result demonstrates that the mean WTP value from the double bounded dichotomous choice ranges from 70.44 to 80.64 Ethiopian Birr per year per household. Likewise, the aggregated welfare gain expected from the rehabilitation intervention ranges from 2,464,977 ($85,589) to 2,821,916 ($97,983) Ethiopian Birr per year. The double hurdle model result revealed that participation in natural resource conservation, frequency of extension contact and trust in budget allocation have a positive and significant effect on households' WTP. Whereas, factors, such as land size around the wetland, distance to the wetland and credit utilization have a negative influence on households’ WTP. These findings suggest that most of the sampled households are willing to contribute for the rehabilitation intervention and this could have implications for the success of future implementation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8803591
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88035912022-02-04 Households’ willingness to pay for the rehabilitation of wetlands: evidence from Gudera Wetland, Northwest Ethiopia Asmare, Erkie Bekele, Ketema Fentaw, Saleamlak Heliyon Research Article Gudera wetland is accredited as a home for innumerable goods and services that have economic value for individuals living around and outside them. However, due to the absence of rehabilitation intervention, the wetland is at the edge of collapse at this time. This paper aims to: (1) estimate households' mean willingness to pay (WTP) for the rehabilitation of the wetland, (2) investigate determinants that affect the probability and intensity of WTP, and (3) estimate aggregated welfare gains from the intervention. To address these objectives, data from 237 household heads were collected using a two-stage random sampling procedure. For the analysis, econometric models, such as bivariate probit and double hurdle, were employed to estimate the mean WTP and determinants of WTP, respectively. The result demonstrates that the mean WTP value from the double bounded dichotomous choice ranges from 70.44 to 80.64 Ethiopian Birr per year per household. Likewise, the aggregated welfare gain expected from the rehabilitation intervention ranges from 2,464,977 ($85,589) to 2,821,916 ($97,983) Ethiopian Birr per year. The double hurdle model result revealed that participation in natural resource conservation, frequency of extension contact and trust in budget allocation have a positive and significant effect on households' WTP. Whereas, factors, such as land size around the wetland, distance to the wetland and credit utilization have a negative influence on households’ WTP. These findings suggest that most of the sampled households are willing to contribute for the rehabilitation intervention and this could have implications for the success of future implementation. Elsevier 2022-01-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8803591/ /pubmed/35128102 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e08813 Text en © 2022 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Research Article
Asmare, Erkie
Bekele, Ketema
Fentaw, Saleamlak
Households’ willingness to pay for the rehabilitation of wetlands: evidence from Gudera Wetland, Northwest Ethiopia
title Households’ willingness to pay for the rehabilitation of wetlands: evidence from Gudera Wetland, Northwest Ethiopia
title_full Households’ willingness to pay for the rehabilitation of wetlands: evidence from Gudera Wetland, Northwest Ethiopia
title_fullStr Households’ willingness to pay for the rehabilitation of wetlands: evidence from Gudera Wetland, Northwest Ethiopia
title_full_unstemmed Households’ willingness to pay for the rehabilitation of wetlands: evidence from Gudera Wetland, Northwest Ethiopia
title_short Households’ willingness to pay for the rehabilitation of wetlands: evidence from Gudera Wetland, Northwest Ethiopia
title_sort households’ willingness to pay for the rehabilitation of wetlands: evidence from gudera wetland, northwest ethiopia
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8803591/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35128102
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e08813
work_keys_str_mv AT asmareerkie householdswillingnesstopayfortherehabilitationofwetlandsevidencefromguderawetlandnorthwestethiopia
AT bekeleketema householdswillingnesstopayfortherehabilitationofwetlandsevidencefromguderawetlandnorthwestethiopia
AT fentawsaleamlak householdswillingnesstopayfortherehabilitationofwetlandsevidencefromguderawetlandnorthwestethiopia