Overestimation of corneal endothelial cell density by automated method in glaucomatous eyes with impaired corneal endothelial cells

PURPOSE: To determine between-method differences in corneal endothelial cell parameters using center and automated methods of non-contact specular microscopy (CellCheck software of Konan, Inc.) in glaucomatous eyes. METHODS: We analyzed the central corneal endothelial cell density (ECD) of 245 glaucomatous eyes using center (ECD-Ce) and automated methods (ECD-Au). Based on the ECD-Ce, we allocated subjects to Groups 1 to 10 (at 250 cells/mm(2) intervals) and evaluated the ECD, coefficient of variation in cell area (CV), and percentage of hexagonal cells (HEX). RESULTS: There was a close correlation (r = 0.91) between the ECD values measured using both methods. However, ECD-Au were significantly higher than those measured by the center method when ECD-Ce was less than 2500 (in Groups 1 to 8; P < 0.001 to P = 0.006). The regression equation of (ECD-Au—ECD-Ce) = 1028–0.397*ECD-Ce shows greater deviation in eyes with lower ECD, and this difference became 0 when ECD -Ce was 2593 cells/mm(2). None of the 44 subjects with an ECD-Ce of < 1000 cells/mm(2) recorded an ECD-Au < 1000 cells/mm(2). Compared with the center method, the automated method had higher and lower median CV and HEX values, respectively (P < 0.001). The between-method differences in both CV and HEX were negatively correlated with ECD-Ce (r = −0.49, P < 0.001 and r = −0.25, P < 0.001, respectively). CONCLUSION: The automated method of the CellCheck software overestimates ECD in eyes with lower ECD values and may overlook risk of corneal decompensation.