Cargando…

A comparison of the clinical effects of thinning and drilling on laser-assisted hatching

To systematically investigate the effects of two methods used for laser-assisted hatching (LAH) on clinical outcomes after day 4 (D4) on frozen-embryo-transfer (FET) cycles. Data from 11471 infertile patients who underwent FET cycles between January 2014 and October 2018 was retrospectively analyzed...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Yujiang, Chen, Chuangqi, Liang, Jiaying, Fan, Lin, Liu, Dun, Zhang, Xiqian, Liu, Fenghua
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer London 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8803699/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33442852
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10103-020-03230-9
_version_ 1784642924817940480
author Wang, Yujiang
Chen, Chuangqi
Liang, Jiaying
Fan, Lin
Liu, Dun
Zhang, Xiqian
Liu, Fenghua
author_facet Wang, Yujiang
Chen, Chuangqi
Liang, Jiaying
Fan, Lin
Liu, Dun
Zhang, Xiqian
Liu, Fenghua
author_sort Wang, Yujiang
collection PubMed
description To systematically investigate the effects of two methods used for laser-assisted hatching (LAH) on clinical outcomes after day 4 (D4) on frozen-embryo-transfer (FET) cycles. Data from 11471 infertile patients who underwent FET cycles between January 2014 and October 2018 was retrospectively analyzed. The 1410 patients who met the inclusion criteria were further categorized into two groups based on the hatching procedure used: the thinning laser-assisted hatching group (T-LAH, 716 patients), and the drilling laser-assisted hatching group (D-LAH, 694 patients). The baseline characteristics of the patients were consistent between the two groups. However, the rates of implantation and clinical pregnancy were significantly higher in the T-LAH group compared to the D-LAH group (32.73% vs. 29.09%, P < 0.01, and 50.98% vs. 43.95%, P < 0.01). The proportion of live birth was also higher in the T-LAH group, but the difference was insignificant (39.11% vs. 36.89%, P > 0.05). Moreover, there were no significant differences in rates of miscarriages, multiple pregnancies, ectopic pregnancies, preterm births, and congenital disabilities between the two groups. Nonetheless, significantly higher rates of implantation and pregnancy were reported in the T-LAH group compared to the D-LAH group among patients aged <35 years, patients with at least one previously failed cycle, and patients with an endometrial thickness of 8–10 mm. T-LAH is superior to D-LAH in improving clinical implantation and pregnancy outcomes in D4 FET, particularly in patients aged <35 years with at least one previously failed cycle or an endometrial thickness of 8–10 mm. The findings of this study provide theoretical support for clinical individualized diagnosis and treatment of patients with infertility.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8803699
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer London
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88036992022-02-02 A comparison of the clinical effects of thinning and drilling on laser-assisted hatching Wang, Yujiang Chen, Chuangqi Liang, Jiaying Fan, Lin Liu, Dun Zhang, Xiqian Liu, Fenghua Lasers Med Sci Review Article To systematically investigate the effects of two methods used for laser-assisted hatching (LAH) on clinical outcomes after day 4 (D4) on frozen-embryo-transfer (FET) cycles. Data from 11471 infertile patients who underwent FET cycles between January 2014 and October 2018 was retrospectively analyzed. The 1410 patients who met the inclusion criteria were further categorized into two groups based on the hatching procedure used: the thinning laser-assisted hatching group (T-LAH, 716 patients), and the drilling laser-assisted hatching group (D-LAH, 694 patients). The baseline characteristics of the patients were consistent between the two groups. However, the rates of implantation and clinical pregnancy were significantly higher in the T-LAH group compared to the D-LAH group (32.73% vs. 29.09%, P < 0.01, and 50.98% vs. 43.95%, P < 0.01). The proportion of live birth was also higher in the T-LAH group, but the difference was insignificant (39.11% vs. 36.89%, P > 0.05). Moreover, there were no significant differences in rates of miscarriages, multiple pregnancies, ectopic pregnancies, preterm births, and congenital disabilities between the two groups. Nonetheless, significantly higher rates of implantation and pregnancy were reported in the T-LAH group compared to the D-LAH group among patients aged <35 years, patients with at least one previously failed cycle, and patients with an endometrial thickness of 8–10 mm. T-LAH is superior to D-LAH in improving clinical implantation and pregnancy outcomes in D4 FET, particularly in patients aged <35 years with at least one previously failed cycle or an endometrial thickness of 8–10 mm. The findings of this study provide theoretical support for clinical individualized diagnosis and treatment of patients with infertility. Springer London 2021-01-13 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8803699/ /pubmed/33442852 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10103-020-03230-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Review Article
Wang, Yujiang
Chen, Chuangqi
Liang, Jiaying
Fan, Lin
Liu, Dun
Zhang, Xiqian
Liu, Fenghua
A comparison of the clinical effects of thinning and drilling on laser-assisted hatching
title A comparison of the clinical effects of thinning and drilling on laser-assisted hatching
title_full A comparison of the clinical effects of thinning and drilling on laser-assisted hatching
title_fullStr A comparison of the clinical effects of thinning and drilling on laser-assisted hatching
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of the clinical effects of thinning and drilling on laser-assisted hatching
title_short A comparison of the clinical effects of thinning and drilling on laser-assisted hatching
title_sort comparison of the clinical effects of thinning and drilling on laser-assisted hatching
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8803699/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33442852
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10103-020-03230-9
work_keys_str_mv AT wangyujiang acomparisonoftheclinicaleffectsofthinninganddrillingonlaserassistedhatching
AT chenchuangqi acomparisonoftheclinicaleffectsofthinninganddrillingonlaserassistedhatching
AT liangjiaying acomparisonoftheclinicaleffectsofthinninganddrillingonlaserassistedhatching
AT fanlin acomparisonoftheclinicaleffectsofthinninganddrillingonlaserassistedhatching
AT liudun acomparisonoftheclinicaleffectsofthinninganddrillingonlaserassistedhatching
AT zhangxiqian acomparisonoftheclinicaleffectsofthinninganddrillingonlaserassistedhatching
AT liufenghua acomparisonoftheclinicaleffectsofthinninganddrillingonlaserassistedhatching
AT wangyujiang comparisonoftheclinicaleffectsofthinninganddrillingonlaserassistedhatching
AT chenchuangqi comparisonoftheclinicaleffectsofthinninganddrillingonlaserassistedhatching
AT liangjiaying comparisonoftheclinicaleffectsofthinninganddrillingonlaserassistedhatching
AT fanlin comparisonoftheclinicaleffectsofthinninganddrillingonlaserassistedhatching
AT liudun comparisonoftheclinicaleffectsofthinninganddrillingonlaserassistedhatching
AT zhangxiqian comparisonoftheclinicaleffectsofthinninganddrillingonlaserassistedhatching
AT liufenghua comparisonoftheclinicaleffectsofthinninganddrillingonlaserassistedhatching