Cargando…

Interocular biometric parameters comparison measured with swept-source technology

PURPOSE: In the event that any ocular parameter involved in the calculation of intraocular lens power could not be properly measured in one eye, it is important to know whether clinically relevant differences between both eyes can be expected. The aim of this work is to evaluate the symmetry of inte...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Albarrán-Diego, César, Poyales, Francisco, López-Artero, Esther, Garzón, Nuria, García-Montero, María
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Netherlands 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8803707/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34417946
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10792-021-02020-8
_version_ 1784642926488322048
author Albarrán-Diego, César
Poyales, Francisco
López-Artero, Esther
Garzón, Nuria
García-Montero, María
author_facet Albarrán-Diego, César
Poyales, Francisco
López-Artero, Esther
Garzón, Nuria
García-Montero, María
author_sort Albarrán-Diego, César
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: In the event that any ocular parameter involved in the calculation of intraocular lens power could not be properly measured in one eye, it is important to know whether clinically relevant differences between both eyes can be expected. The aim of this work is to evaluate the symmetry of interocular biometric parameters. METHODS: This was a prospective, cross-sectional study involving 4090 subjects. Patients underwent consecutive swept-source optical biometry performed with an IOLMaster 700 (Carl Zeiss Meditec AG, Jena, Germany). The biometric parameters that were evaluated were: axial length (AL), mean anterior curvature (Rm), anterior chamber depth (ACD), crystalline lens thickness (LT), central corneal thickness (CCT) and white-to-white (WTW). The Chang–Waring chord distance (CWC-D) and the Chang–Waring chord angle (CWC-A) were also evaluated. RESULTS: There is an excellent correlation between both eyes for almost all the biometric parameters under study, with the exception of the CWC. Agreement for AL was better for eyes shorter than 24 mm. The linearity of the OD-vs-OS relationship can be correctly assumed for all parameters (Cusum test: p > 0.05 in all cases). CONCLUSION: There are no clinically significant interocular differences for the biometric parameters under study, although for all of them, except the LT, statistically significant differences did arise. In the case of AL, moderate differences can be expected in eyes larger than 24 mm.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8803707
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Netherlands
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88037072022-02-02 Interocular biometric parameters comparison measured with swept-source technology Albarrán-Diego, César Poyales, Francisco López-Artero, Esther Garzón, Nuria García-Montero, María Int Ophthalmol Original Paper PURPOSE: In the event that any ocular parameter involved in the calculation of intraocular lens power could not be properly measured in one eye, it is important to know whether clinically relevant differences between both eyes can be expected. The aim of this work is to evaluate the symmetry of interocular biometric parameters. METHODS: This was a prospective, cross-sectional study involving 4090 subjects. Patients underwent consecutive swept-source optical biometry performed with an IOLMaster 700 (Carl Zeiss Meditec AG, Jena, Germany). The biometric parameters that were evaluated were: axial length (AL), mean anterior curvature (Rm), anterior chamber depth (ACD), crystalline lens thickness (LT), central corneal thickness (CCT) and white-to-white (WTW). The Chang–Waring chord distance (CWC-D) and the Chang–Waring chord angle (CWC-A) were also evaluated. RESULTS: There is an excellent correlation between both eyes for almost all the biometric parameters under study, with the exception of the CWC. Agreement for AL was better for eyes shorter than 24 mm. The linearity of the OD-vs-OS relationship can be correctly assumed for all parameters (Cusum test: p > 0.05 in all cases). CONCLUSION: There are no clinically significant interocular differences for the biometric parameters under study, although for all of them, except the LT, statistically significant differences did arise. In the case of AL, moderate differences can be expected in eyes larger than 24 mm. Springer Netherlands 2021-08-21 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8803707/ /pubmed/34417946 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10792-021-02020-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Paper
Albarrán-Diego, César
Poyales, Francisco
López-Artero, Esther
Garzón, Nuria
García-Montero, María
Interocular biometric parameters comparison measured with swept-source technology
title Interocular biometric parameters comparison measured with swept-source technology
title_full Interocular biometric parameters comparison measured with swept-source technology
title_fullStr Interocular biometric parameters comparison measured with swept-source technology
title_full_unstemmed Interocular biometric parameters comparison measured with swept-source technology
title_short Interocular biometric parameters comparison measured with swept-source technology
title_sort interocular biometric parameters comparison measured with swept-source technology
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8803707/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34417946
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10792-021-02020-8
work_keys_str_mv AT albarrandiegocesar interocularbiometricparameterscomparisonmeasuredwithsweptsourcetechnology
AT poyalesfrancisco interocularbiometricparameterscomparisonmeasuredwithsweptsourcetechnology
AT lopezarteroesther interocularbiometricparameterscomparisonmeasuredwithsweptsourcetechnology
AT garzonnuria interocularbiometricparameterscomparisonmeasuredwithsweptsourcetechnology
AT garciamonteromaria interocularbiometricparameterscomparisonmeasuredwithsweptsourcetechnology