Cargando…
Interocular biometric parameters comparison measured with swept-source technology
PURPOSE: In the event that any ocular parameter involved in the calculation of intraocular lens power could not be properly measured in one eye, it is important to know whether clinically relevant differences between both eyes can be expected. The aim of this work is to evaluate the symmetry of inte...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Netherlands
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8803707/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34417946 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10792-021-02020-8 |
_version_ | 1784642926488322048 |
---|---|
author | Albarrán-Diego, César Poyales, Francisco López-Artero, Esther Garzón, Nuria García-Montero, María |
author_facet | Albarrán-Diego, César Poyales, Francisco López-Artero, Esther Garzón, Nuria García-Montero, María |
author_sort | Albarrán-Diego, César |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: In the event that any ocular parameter involved in the calculation of intraocular lens power could not be properly measured in one eye, it is important to know whether clinically relevant differences between both eyes can be expected. The aim of this work is to evaluate the symmetry of interocular biometric parameters. METHODS: This was a prospective, cross-sectional study involving 4090 subjects. Patients underwent consecutive swept-source optical biometry performed with an IOLMaster 700 (Carl Zeiss Meditec AG, Jena, Germany). The biometric parameters that were evaluated were: axial length (AL), mean anterior curvature (Rm), anterior chamber depth (ACD), crystalline lens thickness (LT), central corneal thickness (CCT) and white-to-white (WTW). The Chang–Waring chord distance (CWC-D) and the Chang–Waring chord angle (CWC-A) were also evaluated. RESULTS: There is an excellent correlation between both eyes for almost all the biometric parameters under study, with the exception of the CWC. Agreement for AL was better for eyes shorter than 24 mm. The linearity of the OD-vs-OS relationship can be correctly assumed for all parameters (Cusum test: p > 0.05 in all cases). CONCLUSION: There are no clinically significant interocular differences for the biometric parameters under study, although for all of them, except the LT, statistically significant differences did arise. In the case of AL, moderate differences can be expected in eyes larger than 24 mm. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8803707 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer Netherlands |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88037072022-02-02 Interocular biometric parameters comparison measured with swept-source technology Albarrán-Diego, César Poyales, Francisco López-Artero, Esther Garzón, Nuria García-Montero, María Int Ophthalmol Original Paper PURPOSE: In the event that any ocular parameter involved in the calculation of intraocular lens power could not be properly measured in one eye, it is important to know whether clinically relevant differences between both eyes can be expected. The aim of this work is to evaluate the symmetry of interocular biometric parameters. METHODS: This was a prospective, cross-sectional study involving 4090 subjects. Patients underwent consecutive swept-source optical biometry performed with an IOLMaster 700 (Carl Zeiss Meditec AG, Jena, Germany). The biometric parameters that were evaluated were: axial length (AL), mean anterior curvature (Rm), anterior chamber depth (ACD), crystalline lens thickness (LT), central corneal thickness (CCT) and white-to-white (WTW). The Chang–Waring chord distance (CWC-D) and the Chang–Waring chord angle (CWC-A) were also evaluated. RESULTS: There is an excellent correlation between both eyes for almost all the biometric parameters under study, with the exception of the CWC. Agreement for AL was better for eyes shorter than 24 mm. The linearity of the OD-vs-OS relationship can be correctly assumed for all parameters (Cusum test: p > 0.05 in all cases). CONCLUSION: There are no clinically significant interocular differences for the biometric parameters under study, although for all of them, except the LT, statistically significant differences did arise. In the case of AL, moderate differences can be expected in eyes larger than 24 mm. Springer Netherlands 2021-08-21 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8803707/ /pubmed/34417946 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10792-021-02020-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Albarrán-Diego, César Poyales, Francisco López-Artero, Esther Garzón, Nuria García-Montero, María Interocular biometric parameters comparison measured with swept-source technology |
title | Interocular biometric parameters comparison measured with swept-source technology |
title_full | Interocular biometric parameters comparison measured with swept-source technology |
title_fullStr | Interocular biometric parameters comparison measured with swept-source technology |
title_full_unstemmed | Interocular biometric parameters comparison measured with swept-source technology |
title_short | Interocular biometric parameters comparison measured with swept-source technology |
title_sort | interocular biometric parameters comparison measured with swept-source technology |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8803707/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34417946 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10792-021-02020-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT albarrandiegocesar interocularbiometricparameterscomparisonmeasuredwithsweptsourcetechnology AT poyalesfrancisco interocularbiometricparameterscomparisonmeasuredwithsweptsourcetechnology AT lopezarteroesther interocularbiometricparameterscomparisonmeasuredwithsweptsourcetechnology AT garzonnuria interocularbiometricparameterscomparisonmeasuredwithsweptsourcetechnology AT garciamonteromaria interocularbiometricparameterscomparisonmeasuredwithsweptsourcetechnology |