Cargando…

Estimating red fox density using non-invasive genetic sampling and spatial capture–recapture modelling

Spatial capture–recapture modelling (SCR) is a powerful tool for estimating density, population size, and space use of elusive animals. Here, we applied SCR modelling to non-invasive genetic sampling (NGS) data to estimate red fox (Vulpes vulpes) densities in two areas of boreal forest in central (2...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lindsø, Lars K., Dupont, Pierre, Rød-Eriksen, Lars, Andersskog, Ida Pernille Øystese, Ulvund, Kristine Roaldsnes, Flagstad, Øystein, Bischof, Richard, Eide, Nina E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8803778/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34859281
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00442-021-05087-3
_version_ 1784642942818844672
author Lindsø, Lars K.
Dupont, Pierre
Rød-Eriksen, Lars
Andersskog, Ida Pernille Øystese
Ulvund, Kristine Roaldsnes
Flagstad, Øystein
Bischof, Richard
Eide, Nina E.
author_facet Lindsø, Lars K.
Dupont, Pierre
Rød-Eriksen, Lars
Andersskog, Ida Pernille Øystese
Ulvund, Kristine Roaldsnes
Flagstad, Øystein
Bischof, Richard
Eide, Nina E.
author_sort Lindsø, Lars K.
collection PubMed
description Spatial capture–recapture modelling (SCR) is a powerful tool for estimating density, population size, and space use of elusive animals. Here, we applied SCR modelling to non-invasive genetic sampling (NGS) data to estimate red fox (Vulpes vulpes) densities in two areas of boreal forest in central (2016–2018) and southern Norway (2017–2018). Estimated densities were overall lower in the central study area (mean = 0.04 foxes per km(2) in 2016, 0.10 in 2017, and 0.06 in 2018) compared to the southern study area (0.16 in 2017 and 0.09 in 2018). We found a positive effect of forest cover on density in the central, but not the southern study area. The absence of an effect in the southern area may reflect a paucity of evidence caused by low variation in forest cover. Estimated mean home-range size in the central study area was 45 km(2) [95%CI 34–60] for females and 88 km(2) [69–113] for males. Mean home-range sizes were smaller in the southern study area (26 km(2) [16–42] for females and 56 km(2) [35–91] for males). In both study areas, detection probability was session-dependent and affected by sampling effort. This study highlights how SCR modelling in combination with NGS can be used to efficiently monitor red fox populations, and simultaneously incorporate ecological factors and estimate their effects on population density and space use. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00442-021-05087-3.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8803778
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88037782022-02-02 Estimating red fox density using non-invasive genetic sampling and spatial capture–recapture modelling Lindsø, Lars K. Dupont, Pierre Rød-Eriksen, Lars Andersskog, Ida Pernille Øystese Ulvund, Kristine Roaldsnes Flagstad, Øystein Bischof, Richard Eide, Nina E. Oecologia Population Ecology–Original Research Spatial capture–recapture modelling (SCR) is a powerful tool for estimating density, population size, and space use of elusive animals. Here, we applied SCR modelling to non-invasive genetic sampling (NGS) data to estimate red fox (Vulpes vulpes) densities in two areas of boreal forest in central (2016–2018) and southern Norway (2017–2018). Estimated densities were overall lower in the central study area (mean = 0.04 foxes per km(2) in 2016, 0.10 in 2017, and 0.06 in 2018) compared to the southern study area (0.16 in 2017 and 0.09 in 2018). We found a positive effect of forest cover on density in the central, but not the southern study area. The absence of an effect in the southern area may reflect a paucity of evidence caused by low variation in forest cover. Estimated mean home-range size in the central study area was 45 km(2) [95%CI 34–60] for females and 88 km(2) [69–113] for males. Mean home-range sizes were smaller in the southern study area (26 km(2) [16–42] for females and 56 km(2) [35–91] for males). In both study areas, detection probability was session-dependent and affected by sampling effort. This study highlights how SCR modelling in combination with NGS can be used to efficiently monitor red fox populations, and simultaneously incorporate ecological factors and estimate their effects on population density and space use. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00442-021-05087-3. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-12-02 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8803778/ /pubmed/34859281 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00442-021-05087-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Population Ecology–Original Research
Lindsø, Lars K.
Dupont, Pierre
Rød-Eriksen, Lars
Andersskog, Ida Pernille Øystese
Ulvund, Kristine Roaldsnes
Flagstad, Øystein
Bischof, Richard
Eide, Nina E.
Estimating red fox density using non-invasive genetic sampling and spatial capture–recapture modelling
title Estimating red fox density using non-invasive genetic sampling and spatial capture–recapture modelling
title_full Estimating red fox density using non-invasive genetic sampling and spatial capture–recapture modelling
title_fullStr Estimating red fox density using non-invasive genetic sampling and spatial capture–recapture modelling
title_full_unstemmed Estimating red fox density using non-invasive genetic sampling and spatial capture–recapture modelling
title_short Estimating red fox density using non-invasive genetic sampling and spatial capture–recapture modelling
title_sort estimating red fox density using non-invasive genetic sampling and spatial capture–recapture modelling
topic Population Ecology–Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8803778/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34859281
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00442-021-05087-3
work_keys_str_mv AT lindsølarsk estimatingredfoxdensityusingnoninvasivegeneticsamplingandspatialcapturerecapturemodelling
AT dupontpierre estimatingredfoxdensityusingnoninvasivegeneticsamplingandspatialcapturerecapturemodelling
AT røderiksenlars estimatingredfoxdensityusingnoninvasivegeneticsamplingandspatialcapturerecapturemodelling
AT andersskogidapernilleøystese estimatingredfoxdensityusingnoninvasivegeneticsamplingandspatialcapturerecapturemodelling
AT ulvundkristineroaldsnes estimatingredfoxdensityusingnoninvasivegeneticsamplingandspatialcapturerecapturemodelling
AT flagstadøystein estimatingredfoxdensityusingnoninvasivegeneticsamplingandspatialcapturerecapturemodelling
AT bischofrichard estimatingredfoxdensityusingnoninvasivegeneticsamplingandspatialcapturerecapturemodelling
AT eideninae estimatingredfoxdensityusingnoninvasivegeneticsamplingandspatialcapturerecapturemodelling