Cargando…
Comprehensive analysis of dose intensity of acute lymphoblastic leukemia chemotherapy
Chemotherapy dosages are often compromised, but most reports lack data on dosages that are actually delivered. In two consecutive acute lymphoblastic leukemia trials that differed in their asparaginase formulation, native E. coli L-asparaginase in St. Jude Total 15 (T15, n=365) and pegaspargase in T...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Fondazione Ferrata Storti
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8804576/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34196166 http://dx.doi.org/10.3324/haematol.2021.278411 |
_version_ | 1784643104979025920 |
---|---|
author | Karol, Seth E. Pei, Deqing Smith, Colton A. Liu, Yiwei Yang, Wenjian Kornegay, Nancy M. Panetta, John C. Crews, Kristine R. Cheng, Cheng Finch, Emily R. Inaba, Hiroto Metzger, Monika L. Rubnitz, Jeffrey E. Ribeiro, Raul C. Gruber, Tanja A. Yang, Jun J. Evans, William E. Jeha, Sima Pui, Ching-Hon Relling, Mary V. |
author_facet | Karol, Seth E. Pei, Deqing Smith, Colton A. Liu, Yiwei Yang, Wenjian Kornegay, Nancy M. Panetta, John C. Crews, Kristine R. Cheng, Cheng Finch, Emily R. Inaba, Hiroto Metzger, Monika L. Rubnitz, Jeffrey E. Ribeiro, Raul C. Gruber, Tanja A. Yang, Jun J. Evans, William E. Jeha, Sima Pui, Ching-Hon Relling, Mary V. |
author_sort | Karol, Seth E. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Chemotherapy dosages are often compromised, but most reports lack data on dosages that are actually delivered. In two consecutive acute lymphoblastic leukemia trials that differed in their asparaginase formulation, native E. coli L-asparaginase in St. Jude Total 15 (T15, n=365) and pegaspargase in Total 16 (T16, n=524), we tallied the dose intensities for all drugs on the low-risk or standard-risk arms, analyzing 504,039 dosing records. The median dose intensity for each drug ranged from 61-100%. Dose intensities for several drugs were more than 10% higher on T15 than on T16: cyclophosphamide (P<0.0001 for the standard- risk arm), cytarabine (P<0.0001 for the standard-risk arm), and mercaptopurine (P<0.0001 for the low-risk arm and P<0.0001 for the standardrisk arm). We attributed the lower dosages on T16 to the higher asparaginase dosages on T16 than on T15 (P<0.0001 for both the low-risk and standard-risk arms), with higher dose-intensity for mercaptopurine in those with anti-asparaginase antibodies than in those without (P=5.62x10(- 3) for T15 standard risk and P=1.43x10(-4) for T16 standard risk). Neutrophil count did not differ between protocols for low-risk patients (P=0.18) and was actually lower for standard-risk patients on T16 than on T15 (P<0.0001) despite lower dosages of most drugs on T16. Patients with low asparaginase dose intensity had higher methotrexate dose intensity with no impact on prognosis. The only dose intensity measure predicting a higher risk of relapse on both studies was higher mercaptopurine dose intensity, but this did not reach statistical significance (P=0.03 T15; P=0.07 T16). In these intensive multiagent trials, higher dosages of asparaginase compromised the dosing of other drugs for acute lymphoblastic leukemia, particularly mercaptopurine, but lower chemotherapy dose intensity was not associated with relapse. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8804576 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Fondazione Ferrata Storti |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88045762022-02-23 Comprehensive analysis of dose intensity of acute lymphoblastic leukemia chemotherapy Karol, Seth E. Pei, Deqing Smith, Colton A. Liu, Yiwei Yang, Wenjian Kornegay, Nancy M. Panetta, John C. Crews, Kristine R. Cheng, Cheng Finch, Emily R. Inaba, Hiroto Metzger, Monika L. Rubnitz, Jeffrey E. Ribeiro, Raul C. Gruber, Tanja A. Yang, Jun J. Evans, William E. Jeha, Sima Pui, Ching-Hon Relling, Mary V. Haematologica Article Chemotherapy dosages are often compromised, but most reports lack data on dosages that are actually delivered. In two consecutive acute lymphoblastic leukemia trials that differed in their asparaginase formulation, native E. coli L-asparaginase in St. Jude Total 15 (T15, n=365) and pegaspargase in Total 16 (T16, n=524), we tallied the dose intensities for all drugs on the low-risk or standard-risk arms, analyzing 504,039 dosing records. The median dose intensity for each drug ranged from 61-100%. Dose intensities for several drugs were more than 10% higher on T15 than on T16: cyclophosphamide (P<0.0001 for the standard- risk arm), cytarabine (P<0.0001 for the standard-risk arm), and mercaptopurine (P<0.0001 for the low-risk arm and P<0.0001 for the standardrisk arm). We attributed the lower dosages on T16 to the higher asparaginase dosages on T16 than on T15 (P<0.0001 for both the low-risk and standard-risk arms), with higher dose-intensity for mercaptopurine in those with anti-asparaginase antibodies than in those without (P=5.62x10(- 3) for T15 standard risk and P=1.43x10(-4) for T16 standard risk). Neutrophil count did not differ between protocols for low-risk patients (P=0.18) and was actually lower for standard-risk patients on T16 than on T15 (P<0.0001) despite lower dosages of most drugs on T16. Patients with low asparaginase dose intensity had higher methotrexate dose intensity with no impact on prognosis. The only dose intensity measure predicting a higher risk of relapse on both studies was higher mercaptopurine dose intensity, but this did not reach statistical significance (P=0.03 T15; P=0.07 T16). In these intensive multiagent trials, higher dosages of asparaginase compromised the dosing of other drugs for acute lymphoblastic leukemia, particularly mercaptopurine, but lower chemotherapy dose intensity was not associated with relapse. Fondazione Ferrata Storti 2021-07-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8804576/ /pubmed/34196166 http://dx.doi.org/10.3324/haematol.2021.278411 Text en Copyright© 2022 Ferrata Storti Foundation https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License (by-nc 4.0) which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Article Karol, Seth E. Pei, Deqing Smith, Colton A. Liu, Yiwei Yang, Wenjian Kornegay, Nancy M. Panetta, John C. Crews, Kristine R. Cheng, Cheng Finch, Emily R. Inaba, Hiroto Metzger, Monika L. Rubnitz, Jeffrey E. Ribeiro, Raul C. Gruber, Tanja A. Yang, Jun J. Evans, William E. Jeha, Sima Pui, Ching-Hon Relling, Mary V. Comprehensive analysis of dose intensity of acute lymphoblastic leukemia chemotherapy |
title | Comprehensive analysis of dose intensity of acute lymphoblastic leukemia chemotherapy |
title_full | Comprehensive analysis of dose intensity of acute lymphoblastic leukemia chemotherapy |
title_fullStr | Comprehensive analysis of dose intensity of acute lymphoblastic leukemia chemotherapy |
title_full_unstemmed | Comprehensive analysis of dose intensity of acute lymphoblastic leukemia chemotherapy |
title_short | Comprehensive analysis of dose intensity of acute lymphoblastic leukemia chemotherapy |
title_sort | comprehensive analysis of dose intensity of acute lymphoblastic leukemia chemotherapy |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8804576/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34196166 http://dx.doi.org/10.3324/haematol.2021.278411 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT karolsethe comprehensiveanalysisofdoseintensityofacutelymphoblasticleukemiachemotherapy AT peideqing comprehensiveanalysisofdoseintensityofacutelymphoblasticleukemiachemotherapy AT smithcoltona comprehensiveanalysisofdoseintensityofacutelymphoblasticleukemiachemotherapy AT liuyiwei comprehensiveanalysisofdoseintensityofacutelymphoblasticleukemiachemotherapy AT yangwenjian comprehensiveanalysisofdoseintensityofacutelymphoblasticleukemiachemotherapy AT kornegaynancym comprehensiveanalysisofdoseintensityofacutelymphoblasticleukemiachemotherapy AT panettajohnc comprehensiveanalysisofdoseintensityofacutelymphoblasticleukemiachemotherapy AT crewskristiner comprehensiveanalysisofdoseintensityofacutelymphoblasticleukemiachemotherapy AT chengcheng comprehensiveanalysisofdoseintensityofacutelymphoblasticleukemiachemotherapy AT finchemilyr comprehensiveanalysisofdoseintensityofacutelymphoblasticleukemiachemotherapy AT inabahiroto comprehensiveanalysisofdoseintensityofacutelymphoblasticleukemiachemotherapy AT metzgermonikal comprehensiveanalysisofdoseintensityofacutelymphoblasticleukemiachemotherapy AT rubnitzjeffreye comprehensiveanalysisofdoseintensityofacutelymphoblasticleukemiachemotherapy AT ribeiroraulc comprehensiveanalysisofdoseintensityofacutelymphoblasticleukemiachemotherapy AT grubertanjaa comprehensiveanalysisofdoseintensityofacutelymphoblasticleukemiachemotherapy AT yangjunj comprehensiveanalysisofdoseintensityofacutelymphoblasticleukemiachemotherapy AT evanswilliame comprehensiveanalysisofdoseintensityofacutelymphoblasticleukemiachemotherapy AT jehasima comprehensiveanalysisofdoseintensityofacutelymphoblasticleukemiachemotherapy AT puichinghon comprehensiveanalysisofdoseintensityofacutelymphoblasticleukemiachemotherapy AT rellingmaryv comprehensiveanalysisofdoseintensityofacutelymphoblasticleukemiachemotherapy |