Cargando…

Comprehensive analysis of dose intensity of acute lymphoblastic leukemia chemotherapy

Chemotherapy dosages are often compromised, but most reports lack data on dosages that are actually delivered. In two consecutive acute lymphoblastic leukemia trials that differed in their asparaginase formulation, native E. coli L-asparaginase in St. Jude Total 15 (T15, n=365) and pegaspargase in T...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Karol, Seth E., Pei, Deqing, Smith, Colton A., Liu, Yiwei, Yang, Wenjian, Kornegay, Nancy M., Panetta, John C., Crews, Kristine R., Cheng, Cheng, Finch, Emily R., Inaba, Hiroto, Metzger, Monika L., Rubnitz, Jeffrey E., Ribeiro, Raul C., Gruber, Tanja A., Yang, Jun J., Evans, William E., Jeha, Sima, Pui, Ching-Hon, Relling, Mary V.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Fondazione Ferrata Storti 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8804576/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34196166
http://dx.doi.org/10.3324/haematol.2021.278411
_version_ 1784643104979025920
author Karol, Seth E.
Pei, Deqing
Smith, Colton A.
Liu, Yiwei
Yang, Wenjian
Kornegay, Nancy M.
Panetta, John C.
Crews, Kristine R.
Cheng, Cheng
Finch, Emily R.
Inaba, Hiroto
Metzger, Monika L.
Rubnitz, Jeffrey E.
Ribeiro, Raul C.
Gruber, Tanja A.
Yang, Jun J.
Evans, William E.
Jeha, Sima
Pui, Ching-Hon
Relling, Mary V.
author_facet Karol, Seth E.
Pei, Deqing
Smith, Colton A.
Liu, Yiwei
Yang, Wenjian
Kornegay, Nancy M.
Panetta, John C.
Crews, Kristine R.
Cheng, Cheng
Finch, Emily R.
Inaba, Hiroto
Metzger, Monika L.
Rubnitz, Jeffrey E.
Ribeiro, Raul C.
Gruber, Tanja A.
Yang, Jun J.
Evans, William E.
Jeha, Sima
Pui, Ching-Hon
Relling, Mary V.
author_sort Karol, Seth E.
collection PubMed
description Chemotherapy dosages are often compromised, but most reports lack data on dosages that are actually delivered. In two consecutive acute lymphoblastic leukemia trials that differed in their asparaginase formulation, native E. coli L-asparaginase in St. Jude Total 15 (T15, n=365) and pegaspargase in Total 16 (T16, n=524), we tallied the dose intensities for all drugs on the low-risk or standard-risk arms, analyzing 504,039 dosing records. The median dose intensity for each drug ranged from 61-100%. Dose intensities for several drugs were more than 10% higher on T15 than on T16: cyclophosphamide (P<0.0001 for the standard- risk arm), cytarabine (P<0.0001 for the standard-risk arm), and mercaptopurine (P<0.0001 for the low-risk arm and P<0.0001 for the standardrisk arm). We attributed the lower dosages on T16 to the higher asparaginase dosages on T16 than on T15 (P<0.0001 for both the low-risk and standard-risk arms), with higher dose-intensity for mercaptopurine in those with anti-asparaginase antibodies than in those without (P=5.62x10(- 3) for T15 standard risk and P=1.43x10(-4) for T16 standard risk). Neutrophil count did not differ between protocols for low-risk patients (P=0.18) and was actually lower for standard-risk patients on T16 than on T15 (P<0.0001) despite lower dosages of most drugs on T16. Patients with low asparaginase dose intensity had higher methotrexate dose intensity with no impact on prognosis. The only dose intensity measure predicting a higher risk of relapse on both studies was higher mercaptopurine dose intensity, but this did not reach statistical significance (P=0.03 T15; P=0.07 T16). In these intensive multiagent trials, higher dosages of asparaginase compromised the dosing of other drugs for acute lymphoblastic leukemia, particularly mercaptopurine, but lower chemotherapy dose intensity was not associated with relapse.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8804576
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Fondazione Ferrata Storti
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88045762022-02-23 Comprehensive analysis of dose intensity of acute lymphoblastic leukemia chemotherapy Karol, Seth E. Pei, Deqing Smith, Colton A. Liu, Yiwei Yang, Wenjian Kornegay, Nancy M. Panetta, John C. Crews, Kristine R. Cheng, Cheng Finch, Emily R. Inaba, Hiroto Metzger, Monika L. Rubnitz, Jeffrey E. Ribeiro, Raul C. Gruber, Tanja A. Yang, Jun J. Evans, William E. Jeha, Sima Pui, Ching-Hon Relling, Mary V. Haematologica Article Chemotherapy dosages are often compromised, but most reports lack data on dosages that are actually delivered. In two consecutive acute lymphoblastic leukemia trials that differed in their asparaginase formulation, native E. coli L-asparaginase in St. Jude Total 15 (T15, n=365) and pegaspargase in Total 16 (T16, n=524), we tallied the dose intensities for all drugs on the low-risk or standard-risk arms, analyzing 504,039 dosing records. The median dose intensity for each drug ranged from 61-100%. Dose intensities for several drugs were more than 10% higher on T15 than on T16: cyclophosphamide (P<0.0001 for the standard- risk arm), cytarabine (P<0.0001 for the standard-risk arm), and mercaptopurine (P<0.0001 for the low-risk arm and P<0.0001 for the standardrisk arm). We attributed the lower dosages on T16 to the higher asparaginase dosages on T16 than on T15 (P<0.0001 for both the low-risk and standard-risk arms), with higher dose-intensity for mercaptopurine in those with anti-asparaginase antibodies than in those without (P=5.62x10(- 3) for T15 standard risk and P=1.43x10(-4) for T16 standard risk). Neutrophil count did not differ between protocols for low-risk patients (P=0.18) and was actually lower for standard-risk patients on T16 than on T15 (P<0.0001) despite lower dosages of most drugs on T16. Patients with low asparaginase dose intensity had higher methotrexate dose intensity with no impact on prognosis. The only dose intensity measure predicting a higher risk of relapse on both studies was higher mercaptopurine dose intensity, but this did not reach statistical significance (P=0.03 T15; P=0.07 T16). In these intensive multiagent trials, higher dosages of asparaginase compromised the dosing of other drugs for acute lymphoblastic leukemia, particularly mercaptopurine, but lower chemotherapy dose intensity was not associated with relapse. Fondazione Ferrata Storti 2021-07-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8804576/ /pubmed/34196166 http://dx.doi.org/10.3324/haematol.2021.278411 Text en Copyright© 2022 Ferrata Storti Foundation https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License (by-nc 4.0) which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
spellingShingle Article
Karol, Seth E.
Pei, Deqing
Smith, Colton A.
Liu, Yiwei
Yang, Wenjian
Kornegay, Nancy M.
Panetta, John C.
Crews, Kristine R.
Cheng, Cheng
Finch, Emily R.
Inaba, Hiroto
Metzger, Monika L.
Rubnitz, Jeffrey E.
Ribeiro, Raul C.
Gruber, Tanja A.
Yang, Jun J.
Evans, William E.
Jeha, Sima
Pui, Ching-Hon
Relling, Mary V.
Comprehensive analysis of dose intensity of acute lymphoblastic leukemia chemotherapy
title Comprehensive analysis of dose intensity of acute lymphoblastic leukemia chemotherapy
title_full Comprehensive analysis of dose intensity of acute lymphoblastic leukemia chemotherapy
title_fullStr Comprehensive analysis of dose intensity of acute lymphoblastic leukemia chemotherapy
title_full_unstemmed Comprehensive analysis of dose intensity of acute lymphoblastic leukemia chemotherapy
title_short Comprehensive analysis of dose intensity of acute lymphoblastic leukemia chemotherapy
title_sort comprehensive analysis of dose intensity of acute lymphoblastic leukemia chemotherapy
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8804576/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34196166
http://dx.doi.org/10.3324/haematol.2021.278411
work_keys_str_mv AT karolsethe comprehensiveanalysisofdoseintensityofacutelymphoblasticleukemiachemotherapy
AT peideqing comprehensiveanalysisofdoseintensityofacutelymphoblasticleukemiachemotherapy
AT smithcoltona comprehensiveanalysisofdoseintensityofacutelymphoblasticleukemiachemotherapy
AT liuyiwei comprehensiveanalysisofdoseintensityofacutelymphoblasticleukemiachemotherapy
AT yangwenjian comprehensiveanalysisofdoseintensityofacutelymphoblasticleukemiachemotherapy
AT kornegaynancym comprehensiveanalysisofdoseintensityofacutelymphoblasticleukemiachemotherapy
AT panettajohnc comprehensiveanalysisofdoseintensityofacutelymphoblasticleukemiachemotherapy
AT crewskristiner comprehensiveanalysisofdoseintensityofacutelymphoblasticleukemiachemotherapy
AT chengcheng comprehensiveanalysisofdoseintensityofacutelymphoblasticleukemiachemotherapy
AT finchemilyr comprehensiveanalysisofdoseintensityofacutelymphoblasticleukemiachemotherapy
AT inabahiroto comprehensiveanalysisofdoseintensityofacutelymphoblasticleukemiachemotherapy
AT metzgermonikal comprehensiveanalysisofdoseintensityofacutelymphoblasticleukemiachemotherapy
AT rubnitzjeffreye comprehensiveanalysisofdoseintensityofacutelymphoblasticleukemiachemotherapy
AT ribeiroraulc comprehensiveanalysisofdoseintensityofacutelymphoblasticleukemiachemotherapy
AT grubertanjaa comprehensiveanalysisofdoseintensityofacutelymphoblasticleukemiachemotherapy
AT yangjunj comprehensiveanalysisofdoseintensityofacutelymphoblasticleukemiachemotherapy
AT evanswilliame comprehensiveanalysisofdoseintensityofacutelymphoblasticleukemiachemotherapy
AT jehasima comprehensiveanalysisofdoseintensityofacutelymphoblasticleukemiachemotherapy
AT puichinghon comprehensiveanalysisofdoseintensityofacutelymphoblasticleukemiachemotherapy
AT rellingmaryv comprehensiveanalysisofdoseintensityofacutelymphoblasticleukemiachemotherapy