Cargando…

Deprescribing montelukast in children with asthma: a systematic review

BACKGROUND: National and international asthma guidelines recommend adjusting asthma treatment based on levels of control, yet no guidance is given regarding the stepping-down of montelukast in children and young people (CYP). OBJECTIVE: To systematically review evidence regarding deprescribing monte...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dixon, Eleanor Grace, King, Charlotte, Lilley, Andrew, Sinha, Ian P, Hawcutt, Daniel B
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8804657/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35105629
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053112
_version_ 1784643126384656384
author Dixon, Eleanor Grace
King, Charlotte
Lilley, Andrew
Sinha, Ian P
Hawcutt, Daniel B
author_facet Dixon, Eleanor Grace
King, Charlotte
Lilley, Andrew
Sinha, Ian P
Hawcutt, Daniel B
author_sort Dixon, Eleanor Grace
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: National and international asthma guidelines recommend adjusting asthma treatment based on levels of control, yet no guidance is given regarding the stepping-down of montelukast in children and young people (CYP). OBJECTIVE: To systematically review evidence regarding deprescribing montelukast in CYP with established asthma. DESIGN: Systematic review. DATA SOURCES: Embase, Medline, PubMed and CINAHL were searched up to October 2020. STUDY SELECTION: Eligible studies contained patients aged 0–18 years with a diagnosis of asthma, who had been administering montelukast before it was withdrawn. All reasons for withdrawal were included. RESULTS: The search identified 197 papers. After deduplication, five papers were included (three randomised control studies and two cohort studies). Four studies observed the impact of montelukast withdrawal for 2 weeks, and one study for 8 weeks. The impact of withdrawal was measured in the studies using a combination of lung tests (eg, forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1), fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO)), asthma scoring methods and exercise challenges. Of the 17 domains in the Core Outcome Set for Clinical Trials in Childhood Asthma, eight outcomes were measured in at least one of the five studies, with all five studies measuring the outcome of ‘Lung Function’. No significant differences were found between the montelukast and placebo groups following montelukast withdrawal. Significant differences between the comparator points within the test group were found in nine outcomes across four studies; FEV1/forced vital capacity, FEV1, forced expiratory flows (25%–75%), asthma score (study specific), maximum % fall in FEV1 and time to recovery (post exercise) significantly decreased whereas FEV1/bronchodilator response, FeNO and eNO significantly increased. CONCLUSION: Only limited, contradictory and short-term effects of deprescribing montelukast in CYP with established asthma are presented in literature. Definitive studies determining clinical stability, and impact of deprescribing montelukast in CYP are imperative to improve the safety of asthma treatment in CYP. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42020213971.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8804657
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88046572022-02-07 Deprescribing montelukast in children with asthma: a systematic review Dixon, Eleanor Grace King, Charlotte Lilley, Andrew Sinha, Ian P Hawcutt, Daniel B BMJ Open Paediatrics BACKGROUND: National and international asthma guidelines recommend adjusting asthma treatment based on levels of control, yet no guidance is given regarding the stepping-down of montelukast in children and young people (CYP). OBJECTIVE: To systematically review evidence regarding deprescribing montelukast in CYP with established asthma. DESIGN: Systematic review. DATA SOURCES: Embase, Medline, PubMed and CINAHL were searched up to October 2020. STUDY SELECTION: Eligible studies contained patients aged 0–18 years with a diagnosis of asthma, who had been administering montelukast before it was withdrawn. All reasons for withdrawal were included. RESULTS: The search identified 197 papers. After deduplication, five papers were included (three randomised control studies and two cohort studies). Four studies observed the impact of montelukast withdrawal for 2 weeks, and one study for 8 weeks. The impact of withdrawal was measured in the studies using a combination of lung tests (eg, forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1), fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO)), asthma scoring methods and exercise challenges. Of the 17 domains in the Core Outcome Set for Clinical Trials in Childhood Asthma, eight outcomes were measured in at least one of the five studies, with all five studies measuring the outcome of ‘Lung Function’. No significant differences were found between the montelukast and placebo groups following montelukast withdrawal. Significant differences between the comparator points within the test group were found in nine outcomes across four studies; FEV1/forced vital capacity, FEV1, forced expiratory flows (25%–75%), asthma score (study specific), maximum % fall in FEV1 and time to recovery (post exercise) significantly decreased whereas FEV1/bronchodilator response, FeNO and eNO significantly increased. CONCLUSION: Only limited, contradictory and short-term effects of deprescribing montelukast in CYP with established asthma are presented in literature. Definitive studies determining clinical stability, and impact of deprescribing montelukast in CYP are imperative to improve the safety of asthma treatment in CYP. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42020213971. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-01-31 /pmc/articles/PMC8804657/ /pubmed/35105629 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053112 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Paediatrics
Dixon, Eleanor Grace
King, Charlotte
Lilley, Andrew
Sinha, Ian P
Hawcutt, Daniel B
Deprescribing montelukast in children with asthma: a systematic review
title Deprescribing montelukast in children with asthma: a systematic review
title_full Deprescribing montelukast in children with asthma: a systematic review
title_fullStr Deprescribing montelukast in children with asthma: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Deprescribing montelukast in children with asthma: a systematic review
title_short Deprescribing montelukast in children with asthma: a systematic review
title_sort deprescribing montelukast in children with asthma: a systematic review
topic Paediatrics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8804657/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35105629
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053112
work_keys_str_mv AT dixoneleanorgrace deprescribingmontelukastinchildrenwithasthmaasystematicreview
AT kingcharlotte deprescribingmontelukastinchildrenwithasthmaasystematicreview
AT lilleyandrew deprescribingmontelukastinchildrenwithasthmaasystematicreview
AT sinhaianp deprescribingmontelukastinchildrenwithasthmaasystematicreview
AT hawcuttdanielb deprescribingmontelukastinchildrenwithasthmaasystematicreview